SEO Performance MCP
NPM · @AUTOMATELAB/SEO-PERFORMANCE-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
Per-URL SEO verdicts from GSC, GA4, Matomo, Clarity, AI citations: refresh/expand/merge/kill.
Available components
Recent critical change
CVE-2026-25896 affects this package (2 Aug 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security73
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 83 of 222 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (10 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 103 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar) that our sandbox does not supply, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar) that our sandbox does not supply, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar) that our sandbox does not supply, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar) that our sandbox does not supply, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar) that our sandbox does not supply, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox run of this package has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
How do I install the SEO Performance MCP server?
SEO Performance MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
claude mcp add automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp -- npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp -- npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
mcp_servers:
automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"automatelab-tech-seo-performance-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 19 Sept 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 7 Sept 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 6 Sept 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 31 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 30 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp@1.0.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 31 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-8gc5-j5rx-235r | CVE-2026-33036 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-fj3w-jwp8-x2g3 | CVE-2026-27942 | low | yes | |
| GHSA-gh4j-gqv2-49f6 | CVE-2026-41650 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-jmr7-xgp7-cmfj | CVE-2026-26278 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-jp2q-39xq-3w4g | CVE-2026-33349 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-m7jm-9gc2-mpf2 | CVE-2026-25896 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw | CVE-2026-59873 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-34x7-hfp2-rc4v | CVE-2026-24842 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-83g3-92jg-28cx | CVE-2026-26960 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97 | CVE-2026-23745 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-8x88-c5mf-7j5w | CVE-2026-59874 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-9ppj-qmqm-q256 | CVE-2026-31802 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-gvwx-54wh-qm9j | CVE-2026-59875 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-qffp-2rhf-9h96 | CVE-2026-29786 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m | CVE-2026-73566 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-r6q2-hw4h-h46w | CVE-2026-23950 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-vmf3-w455-68vh | CVE-2026-53655 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-w8wr-v893-vjvp | CVE-2026-59871 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52 | CVE-2026-6733 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272 | CVE-2026-13697 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524 | CVE-2026-16728 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m | CVE-2026-11525 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj | CVE-2026-6734 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54 | CVE-2026-14643 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5 | CVE-2026-15157 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv | CVE-2026-9679 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6 | CVE-2026-9678 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm | CVE-2026-16729 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-vmh5-mc38-953g | CVE-2026-9697 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q | CVE-2026-12151 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq | CVE-2026-41907 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 222 packages
| Packages resolved | 222 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 10 |
| Stale | 78 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
What is the SEO Performance MCP server?
SEO Performance MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AutomateLab-tech/seo-performance-mcp. Per-URL SEO verdicts from GSC, GA4, Matomo, Clarity, AI citations: refresh/expand/merge/kill. This page covers its npm package (@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp).
Is the SEO Performance MCP server still maintained?
SEO Performance MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the SEO Performance MCP server under?
SEO Performance MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.