Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

First Party Data CRO

PYPI · FIRST-PARTY-DATA-CRO-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS

First-party funnel, rage-click, checkout, A/B test, and page-speed CRO intelligence.

−4 this week 66 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 61% of PyPI servers

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security94
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Declares code that runs automatically (build-time code we could not rule out (a Hatch, PDM or setuptools build hook, a dynamic version we could not read statically, shipped VCS metadata or a stray root module)) and that we could not recognise. It may be perfectly ordinary, but we have not established what it does. View diagnostics → Partial
  • 1 of 22 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency6
  • Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Licence could not be checked: the licence is shipped as a file inside the package, not declared as a standard (SPDX) licence identifier, so we cannot tell whether it is OSI-approved.Unverified
  • Actively maintained (last published 175 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 326 tokens (~25/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 92% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Partial
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Nov 26 −5
    • Stability: pass → 0.67 functional
  • 29 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 22 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 18 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 17 Oct 26 +18
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: 0.80 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/first-party-data-cro-mcp@0.1.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_hook unreviewed legacy backend root module

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 22 packages
Packages resolved 22
Stale 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~326 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_ab_test_recommendations ~38

Recommend next A/B tests for a page based on speed, behavior, and conversion signals.

NameTypeReqDescription
page_urlstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_checkout_friction_report ~18

Return checkout abandonment diagnostics by step.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_conversion_funnel ~39

Return step-level drop-off and conversion gaps for a supported funnel.

NameTypeReqDescription
end_goalstringyes–
start_pagestringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_license_status ~27

Return payment/license readiness for AtulHritik-Mcp-Suite without exposing secrets.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_live_connector_status ~19

Return CRO data connector readiness without exposing secrets.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_mobile_vs_desktop_gap ~21

Compare device conversion rates and estimate revenue opportunity.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_page_speed_impact ~31

Estimate Core Web Vitals impact and CRO priority for selected pages.

NameTypeReqDescription
pagesarrayyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_product_page_performance ~37

Rank product detail pages by add-to-cart, revenue, conversion, speed, or friction.

NameTypeReqDescription
sort_bystring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_rage_click_pages ~32

Rank pages by frustration signals such as rage clicks and dead clicks.

NameTypeReqDescription
date_rangestringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

health ~4

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_ga4_connection ~19

Run a read-only GA4 smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_pagespeed_connection ~19

Run a read-only PageSpeed smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_shopify_analytics_connection ~22

Run a read-only Shopify products/orders smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the First Party Data CRO MCP server?

First Party Data CRO runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx first-party-data-cro-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · first-party-data-cro-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add atul0016-first-party-data-cro -- uvx first-party-data-cro-mcp
Common questions

What is the First Party Data CRO MCP server?

First Party Data CRO is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.atul0016/first-party-data-cro. First-party funnel, rage-click, checkout, A/B test, and page-speed CRO intelligence. This page covers its PyPI package (first-party-data-cro-mcp).

Is the First Party Data CRO MCP server safe to use?

First Party Data CRO scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the First Party Data CRO MCP server expose?

First Party Data CRO exposes 13 tools: health, get_license_status, get_live_connector_status, test_ga4_connection, test_shopify_analytics_connection, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 326 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the First Party Data CRO MCP server still maintained?

First Party Data CRO is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.