Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Competitive Intelligence

PYPI · COMPETITIVE-INTELLIGENCE-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20

Competitive pricing, ads, SEO moves, launches, reviews, and daily market briefs.

0 this week 69 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 1 of 23 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency6
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 307 tokens (~23/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
  • Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 92% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Partial
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Install

How do I install the Competitive Intelligence MCP server?

Competitive Intelligence runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx competitive-intelligence-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · competitive-intelligence-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add atul0016-competitive-intelligence -- uvx competitive-intelligence-mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atul0016-competitive-intelligence": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "competitive-intelligence-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "atul0016-competitive-intelligence": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "competitive-intelligence-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add atul0016-competitive-intelligence -- uvx competitive-intelligence-mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "atul0016-competitive-intelligence": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "uvx",
        "competitive-intelligence-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add atul0016-competitive-intelligence --command uvx --arg competitive-intelligence-mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  atul0016-competitive-intelligence:
    command: "uvx"
    args: ["competitive-intelligence-mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "atul0016-competitive-intelligence": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "uvx",
      "Arguments": [
        "competitive-intelligence-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add atul0016-competitive-intelligence -t stdio -c uvx -a competitive-intelligence-mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "atul0016-competitive-intelligence": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "competitive-intelligence-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 18 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 17 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 11 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/competitive-intelligence-mcp@0.1.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 23 packages
Packages resolved 23
Stale 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~307 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_competitor_new_ads ~34

Return recently launched competitor ads.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitor_page_idsarrayyes
daysinteger

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_competitor_new_products ~27

Return sitemap and catalog launch diff.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitor_urlsarrayyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_competitor_price_changes ~35

Return competitor price changes in the last week.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitorsarrayyes
productsarrayyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_competitor_review_sentiment ~28

Return review themes and sentiment trend.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitor_brandstringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_competitor_seo_moves ~31

Return new keywords and rank changes for competitor domains.

NameTypeReqDescription
competitor_domainsarrayyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_daily_competitive_brief ~19

Return prioritized daily competitive moves.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_license_status ~27

Return payment/license readiness for AtulHritik-Mcp-Suite without exposing secrets.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_live_connector_status ~19

Return competitive intelligence connector readiness without exposing secrets.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

health ~4

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_competitor_site_connection ~22

Run a read-only competitor site fetch smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_meta_ad_library_connection ~21

Run a read-only Meta Ad Library smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_review_source_connection ~19

Run a read-only review source smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

test_seo_data_connection ~21

Run a read-only SEO data provider smoke check.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Competitive Intelligence MCP server?

Competitive Intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.atul0016/competitive-intelligence. Competitive pricing, ads, SEO moves, launches, reviews, and daily market briefs. This page covers its PyPI package (competitive-intelligence-mcp).

Is the Competitive Intelligence MCP server safe to use?

Competitive Intelligence scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Competitive Intelligence MCP server expose?

Competitive Intelligence exposes 13 tools: health, get_license_status, get_live_connector_status, test_competitor_site_connection, test_meta_ad_library_connection, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 307 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Competitive Intelligence MCP server still maintained?

Competitive Intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.