Agentic House Search
REMOTE · AGENTIC-HOUSE-SEARCH.VERCEL.APP · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20
UK neighbourhood research from government open data: postcode reports, comparisons, 45 datasets.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2148 tokens (~429/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage96
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 88% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Agentic House Search MCP server?
Agentic House Search is a hosted endpoint at https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · agentic-house-search.vercel.app
claude mcp add --transport http asturksever-agentic-house-search 'https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"asturksever-agentic-house-search": {
"url": "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"asturksever-agentic-house-search": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.asturksever-agentic-house-search] url = "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"asturksever-agentic-house-search": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add asturksever-agentic-house-search --url 'https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
asturksever-agentic-house-search:
url: "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"asturksever-agentic-house-search": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add asturksever-agentic-house-search -t streamable-http -u 'https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"asturksever-agentic-house-search": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 3 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Aug 26 +2
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.vercel.app | CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 29 Aug 2026 | 27 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | f7911168ffa7d0f4135e24792e7a52a8 |
| SANs: *.vercel.app | ||||||
| CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7 |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of agentic-house-search.vercel.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| vercel.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
postcode_compare Compare UK postcodes side by side ~457
Compare two to five UK postcodes on chosen categories, aligned measure by measure. Fetches each postcode's report concurrently and lines the facts up in a table, so you can answer "which of these is better connected / quieter / cheaper" in one call instead of several. Args: - postcodes (string[]): 2-5 UK postcodes - categories (string[]): 1-6 of demographics, crime, deprivation, prices, broadband, mobile, noise, transport, amenities, schools, environment - response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): default 'markdown' Returns: One row per measure with a column per postcode, each cell carrying the value, its band, and the category status for that postcode. Caveats collect anything that makes a row not strictly comparable. Comparability warnings you must respect, and which this tool surfaces: - Deprivation ranks from different UK nations are NOT comparable — different indices over different numbers of areas. - A measure missing for one postcode because the dataset does not cover that nation is not a low score; the cell says "out_of_coverage". - Ofcom mobile figures describe a whole local authority, so two postcodes in the same authority will always be identical. - Crime counts describe a 1 km square and depend on each police force submitting data; a very low count can be a gap rather than a quiet street. Examples: - "Which has better broadband, SW11 1AA or M1 1AE?" -> postcodes=[...], categories=["broadband"] - "Compare these three on crime and schools" -> categories=["crime","schools"] Don't use when: you have one postcode (use postcode_report) or want the underlying datasets (use postcode_search_datasets).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | yes | Which categories to compare on. Keep it tight — comparing all eleven across five postcodes produces a very large answer. |
| postcodes | array | yes | Two to five UK postcodes to compare, e.g. ["SW11 1AA", "M1 1AE"] |
| response_format | string | – | 'markdown' for a side-by-side table, 'json' for the structured comparison |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | yes | – |
| caveats | array | yes | – |
| postcodes | array | yes | – |
| rows | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
postcode_get_dataset Get one registry dataset entry ~203
Full registry entry for one dataset, by id. Returns everything needed to call the source yourself: its home page, machine-readable endpoint, API documentation, format, licence, geographic coverage, update cadence, and the concrete questions it can answer. Args: - id (string): registry id, e.g. "police-street-crime", "land-registry-ppd", "ea-flood" - response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): default 'markdown' Examples: - "How do I call the police API?" -> id="police-street-crime" - "What licence is Price Paid under?" -> id="land-registry-ppd" Errors: - Returns the closest matching ids when the id is not found.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Registry id, e.g. "police-street-crime" — find one with postcode_search_datasets |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api | string | yes | – |
| api_docs | string | yes | – |
| category | string | yes | – |
| coverage | string | yes | – |
| dataset | string | yes | – |
| format | string | yes | – |
| id | string | yes | – |
| licence | string | yes | – |
| link | string | yes | – |
| publisher | string | yes | – |
| questions | array | yes | – |
| update_frequency | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
postcode_lookup Look up UK postcode geography ~332
Resolve a UK postcode to its geography — coordinates, local authority, ward, constituency, LSOA/MSOA/output area, police force, rural-urban class and deprivation rank. One fast call with no downstream data fetching. Use it to check a postcode exists, to get the codes needed for other datasets, or when you only need where somewhere is rather than what it is like. Args: - postcode (string): UK postcode, spaces optional - response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): default 'markdown' Returns: Coordinates, administrative geography, statistical geography codes (LSOA/MSOA/OA — these are the keys most UK open datasets are published against), and the deprivation rank with the index it came from. Examples: - "Where is SW11 1AA?" -> postcode="SW11 1AA" - "What LSOA covers M1 1AE?" -> postcode="M1 1AE" - "Is XY1 2AB a real postcode?" -> postcode="XY1 2AB" (returns an error with suggestions) Don't use when: you want data about the area — use postcode_report instead. Note: deprivation ranks are NOT comparable between UK nations. Each nation ranks its own areas against its own index, over a different number of areas; the index and its size are returned so you do not compare them by mistake.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| postcode | string | yes | A UK postcode, e.g. "SW11 1AA" |
| response_format | string | – | 'markdown' to read, 'json' for the structured record |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| constituency | string | yes | – |
| country | string | yes | – |
| deprivation_index | – | yes | – |
| deprivation_rank | – | yes | – |
| latitude | number | yes | – |
| local_authority | object | yes | – |
| longitude | number | yes | – |
| lsoa | object | yes | – |
| msoa | object | yes | – |
| national_park | – | yes | – |
| output_area | – | yes | – |
| police_force | string | yes | – |
| postcode | string | yes | – |
| region | – | yes | – |
| rural_urban | – | yes | – |
| ward | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
postcode_report UK postcode neighbourhood report ~641
Full neighbourhood report for one UK postcode, assembled live from UK government open data. Covers eleven categories: demographics (Census 2021), crime (data.police.uk), deprivation (IMD/WIMD/SIMD/NIMDM), property prices (HM Land Registry), broadband and 5G (Ofcom), noise (Defra), transport, amenities (OpenStreetMap), schools (DfE register: name, phase and distance only, no Ofsted grades) and planning constraints (Planning Data platform, Environment Agency). Every figure carries the geography it describes (a postcode, an LSOA of ~1,500 people, or a whole local authority), the period it covers, and a benchmark where one exists. Read those: a crime count describes a 1 km square, and Ofcom mobile coverage describes an entire local authority, not the street. Args: - postcode (string): UK postcode, spaces optional - categories (string[], optional): subset to fetch; omit for all eleven - include_sources (boolean): append publisher and licence per category (default false) - response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): default 'markdown' Returns: Per category: a status, a one-paragraph summary, the facts (label, value, band, benchmark, geography, period, source id) and any caveats. Statuses that are normal rather than failures: - "out_of_coverage": the dataset genuinely does not cover this nation. Census tables are England & Wales; police.uk excludes Scotland; Planning Data, Defra noise and the DfE school register are England-only. The reason and the devolved equivalent are given. - "unavailable": a pre-built extract has not been generated for this area yet (noise, currently). - "partial": some sources answered and some did not; check notes. Examples: - "What's SW11 1AA like?" -> postcode="SW11 1AA" - "Is the broadband any good at M1 1AE?" -> postcode="M1 1AE", categories=["broadband","mobile"] - "Crime and schools near LA23 1AA" -> postcode="LA23 1AA", categories=["crime","schools"] Errors: - "No such postcode" with suggestions when the postcode…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | – | Which sections to fetch. Omit for all eleven. Fetching only what you need is faster and much smaller — e.g. ["crime","schools"] for a family-safety question. |
| include_sources | boolean | – | Append the publisher and licence of each dataset used (default false) |
| postcode | string | yes | A UK postcode, with or without a space, e.g. "SW11 1AA" or "m11ae" |
| response_format | string | – | 'markdown' to read, 'json' for the full structured facts |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | yes | – |
| country | string | yes | – |
| local_authority | string | yes | – |
| postcode | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
postcode_search_datasets Search the UK open-data registry ~387
Search a curated registry of 45 UK open datasets and APIs for property and neighbourhood research. Each entry records the dataset's home page, its machine-readable endpoint, format, licence, geographic coverage, update cadence, and the concrete questions it can answer. Use it to find the right source for something this server does not report directly — EPC ratings, planning applications, flood risk, council tax bands, bus timetables, air quality, ground stability, land ownership. Args: - query (string, optional): free text over name, publisher, category, endpoint and questions - category (string, optional): category prefix, e.g. "Crime", "Transport", "Environment" - limit (number): 1-45, default 10 - offset (number): pagination offset, default 0 - response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): default 'markdown' Returns: { total, count, offset, has_more, next_offset, datasets: [{ id, dataset, publisher, category, api, licence, coverage, update_frequency }] } Examples: - "Where do I get EPC data?" -> query="EPC" - "What flood datasets are there?" -> query="flood" - "List every transport source" -> category="Transport", limit=20 Follow up with postcode_get_dataset for the full entry including API docs and the questions it answers.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Filter by category prefix, e.g. "Crime", "Transport", "Environment" |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum results (default 10) |
| offset | integer | – | Results to skip, for pagination |
| query | string | – | Free text matched against dataset name, publisher, category, API endpoint and the questions each dataset answers. Omit to list everything. |
| response_format | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | number | yes | – |
| datasets | array | yes | – |
| has_more | boolean | yes | – |
| next_offset | number | – | – |
| offset | number | yes | – |
| total | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the Agentic House Search MCP server?
Agentic House Search is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.asturksever/agentic-house-search. UK neighbourhood research from government open data: postcode reports, comparisons, 45 datasets. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agentic-house-search.vercel.app/mcp).
Is the Agentic House Search MCP server safe to use?
Agentic House Search scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Agentic House Search MCP server expose?
Agentic House Search exposes 5 tools: postcode_report, postcode_lookup, postcode_compare, postcode_search_datasets, postcode_get_dataset. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,020 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Agentic House Search MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Agentic House Search without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Agentic House Search MCP server still maintained?
Agentic House Search is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.