Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Rumors pick-up lines

REMOTE · RUMORS.APP · SCANNED SEP 25

Curated multilingual pick-up lines (Tagalog, pt-BR, Indonesian+) with English glosses.

Available components

+3 this week 77 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security66
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 237 tokens (~59/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
  • Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage79
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 38% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server?

Rumors pick-up lines is a hosted endpoint at https://rumors.app/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · rumors.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-rumors-lines 'https://rumors.app/api/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "app-rumors-lines": {
      "url": "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "app-rumors-lines": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.app-rumors-lines]
url = "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "app-rumors-lines": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://rumors.app/api/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add app-rumors-lines --url 'https://rumors.app/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  app-rumors-lines:
    url: "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "app-rumors-lines": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add app-rumors-lines -t streamable-http -u 'https://rumors.app/api/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "app-rumors-lines": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rumors.app/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Probed https://rumors.app/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=rumors.app CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 18 Sept 2026 17 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 449c3df0ec48070413a3d92bc903bb3b
SANs: rumors.app, *.rumors.app
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of rumors.app. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
rumors.app. present 2371 13 Verified
rumors.app. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://rumors.app/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://rumors.app/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://rumors.app/api/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~186 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_lines ~68

Get lines from one collection by its URL. Each line comes with a literal English gloss.

NameTypeReqDescription
collectionstringyesCollection URL, e.g. /tl/lines/tagalog/
limitinteger––
registerstring–Optional filter: flirty, romantic, funny…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_collections ~31

List published pick-up line collections: URL, title, language (BCP-47) and line count.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

random_line ~43

One random line, optionally narrowed by language and register.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Base language subtag: tl, pt, id…
registerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_lines ~44

Case-insensitive substring search across native text, transliteration and English gloss.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring––
limitinteger––
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server?

Rumors pick-up lines is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.rumors/lines. Curated multilingual pick-up lines (Tagalog, pt-BR, Indonesian+) with English glosses. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rumors.app/api/mcp).

Is the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server safe to use?

Rumors pick-up lines scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server expose?

Rumors pick-up lines exposes 4 tools: list_collections, get_lines, random_line, search_lines. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 186 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Rumors pick-up lines without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Rumors pick-up lines MCP server still maintained?

Rumors pick-up lines is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.