Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data

REMOTE · PAYMENTS-INTEL-PRODUCTION.UP.RAILWAY.APP

Cited stablecoin rails, corridors, providers, chain and token facts for agents. x402/MPP paid.

+3 this week 66 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 55% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1645 tokens (~205/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
  • Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 0
    • Schema quality: 1353 → 1616 ▼ functional
    • New tool “get_token” functional
  • 13 Oct 26 +1
    • Schema quality: 232 → 193 ▲ functional
    • New tool “check_address_format” functional
    • New tool “get_chain” functional
    • New tool “get_examples” functional
  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.up.railway.app CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 27 Sept 2026 26 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 618edc56941aa1165ddb080bf9f799eb7c1
SANs: *.up.railway.app, up.railway.app
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of payments-intel-production.up.railway.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
railway.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~1,557 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_address_format ~143

Is this address well formed for this chain, and what is its EIP-55 checksummed form? Free: deterministic address format check for EVM chains (EIP-55 checksum: valid, checksummed form, whether the input checksum was correct, all lowercase or all uppercase) and Solana (base58, 32 bytes). No external calls. 60 calls/min per client. Format only; says nothing about who controls an address.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyesAddress to check
chainstringyesChain id or name: an EVM chain (e.g. base, ethereum, eip155:8453) or solana

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_corridor ~198

Who can move money from this currency or stablecoin to that one, in this country, over which rails? Paid ($0.03 USDC): Money-movement routes from one currency or stablecoin to another: corridors providers publish (rails, speed, fee notes, cited), plus on/off-ramp routes inferred from ramp coverage, labelled as inferred. This server holds no wallet and never pays: it returns the HTTP 402 payment requirements (x402 on Base, MPP on Tempo) and the URL https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/v1/corridor. Pay with your own x402/MPP client and retry that URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystring–Destination ISO alpha-2 country, e.g. MX
fromstringyesCurrency or stablecoin sent, e.g. USDC or USD
tostringyesCurrency or stablecoin received, e.g. MXN

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_chain ~204

What are the basic facts of this chain (CAIP-2 id, gas token, explorer, x402/MPP settlement, stablecoins)? Paid ($0.001 USDC): Cited chain facts from a prepared dataset: CAIP-2 chain id, gas token, finality class, block explorer, whether x402 and MPP settle there, and stablecoins. Fields not established from a source are the string "unknown". Unknown chains and malformed input return 404/400 and are never charged. This server holds no wallet and never pays: it returns the HTTP 402 payment requirements (x402 on Base, MPP on Tempo) and the URL https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/v1/chain. Pay with your own x402/MPP client and retry that URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainstringyesChain slug, name or CAIP-2 id, e.g. base, solana, eip155:8453

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_examples ~75

What do the paid endpoints return, and what do they cost? Free: prices and paths of every paid endpoint, plus a full example response for GET /v1/provider taken verbatim from a real record, labelled as an example with its last-verified date. Use it to see the shape and depth of paid data before paying.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_provider ~150

What exactly does this provider support, where is it licensed and what does it charge? Paid ($0.01 USDC): Full cited record for one provider: stablecoin rails, corridors, licences, published fees, coverage, developer and agent-payment support. Every fact has source URL, retrieval date, quote and confidence. This server holds no wallet and never pays: it returns the HTTP 402 payment requirements (x402 on Base, MPP on Tempo) and the URL https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/v1/provider. Pay with your own x402/MPP client and retry that URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesProvider id from search_providers, e.g. circle

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_token ~263

What are the symbol, name, decimals, contract address and issuer of this stablecoin on this chain? Paid ($0.001 USDC): Cited stablecoin token facts from a prepared dataset (USDC, EURC, USDT, PYUSD, DAI on the chains /v1/chain covers, where a permissively licensed source lists them): symbol, name, decimals, contract address, chain, issuer, each with a source citation and license. Fields not established from a source are the string "unknown". Malformed input and tokens not in the dataset return 400/404 and are never charged. This server holds no wallet and never pays: it returns the HTTP 402 payment requirements (x402 on Base, MPP on Tempo) and the URL https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/v1/token. Pay with your own x402/MPP client and retry that URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstring–Token contract / mint address (give address or symbol)
chainstringyesChain slug, name or CAIP-2 id, e.g. base, solana, eip155:8453
symbolstring–Stablecoin ticker, e.g. USDC (give symbol or address)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_providers ~250

Which payment or stablecoin providers support this asset, chain, country or service? Free: search payment and stablecoin providers by category, asset, chain, ramp country or service. Returns compact cards (no citations); use get_provider for the full cited record. 50 calls/day per client.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstring–Stablecoin ticker, e.g. USDC, EURC, USDT, PYUSD
categorystring–card_acquiring, orchestration, merchant_of_record, payouts, fx, baas_issuing, open_banking, stablecoin_issuer, stablecoin_infra, onoff_ramp, custody_wallets, agentic_payments
chainstring–Chain, e.g. base, ethereum, solana, tron, polygon
countrystring–ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country for on/off-ramp coverage, e.g. MX
qstring–Name search, e.g. 'bridge'
servicestring–issuance, mint_redeem, on_ramp, off_ramp, payouts, acceptance, settlement, custody, wallets, orchestration, fx, cards

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

stablecoin_rails ~274

Who can on-ramp, off-ramp, issue or settle this stablecoin, on which chain, in which country? Paid ($0.01 USDC): Stablecoin rails by asset, chain, country and service, with the cited stablecoin block for each matching provider (assets, chains, ramp countries, fiat rails, custody model). Country matches say whether the country is listed or only covered by a 'global' claim. This server holds no wallet and never pays: it returns the HTTP 402 payment requirements (x402 on Base, MPP on Tempo) and the URL https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/v1/stablecoin-rails. Pay with your own x402/MPP client and retry that URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstring–Stablecoin ticker, e.g. USDC, EURC, USDT, PYUSD
chainstring–Chain, e.g. base, ethereum, solana, tron, polygon
countrystring–ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country for on/off-ramp coverage, e.g. MX
servicestring–issuance, mint_redeem, on_ramp, off_ramp, payouts, acceptance, settlement, custody, wallets, orchestration, fx, cards

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server?

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data is a hosted endpoint at https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · payments-intel-production.up.railway.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-railway-up-payments-intel-production-payment 'https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server?

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.railway.up.payments-intel-production/payments-intel. Cited stablecoin rails, corridors, providers, chain and token facts for agents. x402/MPP paid. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://payments-intel-production.up.railway.app/mcp).

Is the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server safe to use?

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server expose?

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data exposes 8 tools: search_providers, get_provider, stablecoin_rails, find_corridor, get_examples, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,557 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data MCP server still maintained?

Stablecoin rails, corridors and payment provider data is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.