Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집

REMOTE · NCHA.APP

Korean long-running restaurants (Seoul, Gyeonggi) from public license records, not reviews.

Available components

+4 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Maps and Location

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 707 tokens (~176/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage85
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 54% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ncha.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.ncha.app CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5ca0e3db40c3c5ee7a3d8fffbddcc30ddeb
SANs: *.ncha.app, ncha.app
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of ncha.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
ncha.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://ncha.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://ncha.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://ncha.app/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~527 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_long_running_restaurants ~325

지역·동·메뉴로 같은 자리에서 오래 영업 중인 음식점을 찾습니다(공공 인허가 기록 기준, 별점 없음). "동탄 국밥 맛집", "오산 노포", "평택 서정동 중국집", "마포 노포"처럼 맛집·노포·오래된 식당을 찾거나 맛집 글을 쓸 때 쓰세요. 경기도 31개 시·군(화성 동탄은 "동탄"으로 따로)과 서울 25개 구를 다룹니다.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–업태 묶음. 선택.
dongstring–동·읍·면 이름(예: 석우동, 서정동, 안중읍). 선택.
include_uncertainboolean–다른 가게일 수 있는 기록(확인 필요)도 넣을지.
limitinteger––
menustring–메뉴나 가게 이름 낱말(예: 국밥, 짬뽕, 고기, 회, 칼국수). 선택.
min_yearsinteger–최소 영업 햇수. 기본 10.
regionstring–경기도 시·군 또는 서울 구 이름(예: 수원, 화성 동탄, 경기 광주, 마포구, 서울 중구). "경기"·"서울"이면 그 시·도 전체, 비우면 전체.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_restaurants_near ~111

위도·경도 주변(기본 800m, 걸어서 10분)에서 오래 영업 중인 음식점을 햇수 순으로 찾습니다. 경기도·서울 안에서만 찾습니다(지도 좌표를 채운 가게만, 서울은 채우는 중).

NameTypeReqDescription
latnumberyes–
limitinteger––
lngnumberyes–
min_yearsinteger––
radius_minteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_restaurant ~65

가게 id로 주소, 영업 햇수, 인허가 기록(최초·승계·재신고), 확인할 점을 봅니다.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes가게 id(예: s_6ed1b96dc2)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_regions ~26

엔차가 다루는 지역과 동 목록, 가게 수를 봅니다.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server?

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 is a hosted endpoint at https://ncha.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · ncha.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-ncha-encha 'https://ncha.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server?

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.ncha/encha. Korean long-running restaurants (Seoul, Gyeonggi) from public license records, not reviews. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ncha.app/mcp).

Is the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server safe to use?

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server expose?

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 exposes 4 tools: find_long_running_restaurants, find_restaurants_near, get_restaurant, list_regions. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 527 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the 엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 MCP server still maintained?

엔차 · 오래 버틴 맛집 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.