Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

MilanAura Authority Check

REMOTE · MCP.MILANAURA.APP

Free Authority Check of a professional profile: strengths, biggest gap, first action, a post.

+4 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 387 tokens (~193/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
  • Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 23 Oct 26 74

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=milanaura.app CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 26 Oct 2026 24 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 599fc43e7f6059759a702b9ab714d6705d8
SANs: *.milanaura.app, milanaura.app
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.milanaura.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
milanaura.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~387 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_authority_check_result ~81

Returns the result of an Authority Check started with run_authority_check. Waits up to about 40 seconds. If the check is still running, call this again with the same check_id. Each result can be retrieved once and is discarded after 10 minutes.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_idstringyesThe check_id returned by run_authority_check.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

run_authority_check ~306

Runs a free Authority Check from MilanAura AI Studio on a professional's public profile, such as a LinkedIn headline, About section and experience. Returns what is already working, the Authority Starting Point band, the biggest visibility gap, the first practical action, and one authority post written in the person's own voice. Works in English and Arabic. A check takes one to three minutes. If the result is not ready when this returns, it gives a check_id: call get_authority_check_result with it until the result arrives. Show the result to the user as returned. Profile text is used only to produce the result and is not stored.

NameTypeReqDescription
buyerstring–Who their ideal buyer is.
goalstring–What they want from visibility, for example attract clients.
headlinestring–Their professional headline.
icpstring–Their professional category, for example fractional CFO or executive coach.
languagestring–Output language. Use Arabic when the person writes in Arabic or asks for Arabic. Defaults to English.
namestring–The person's name, if known.
offerstring–What they sell.
profile_textstringyesThe person's public professional profile text: headline, About, experience, and any other public profile material.
proofstring–A concrete result they achieved for a client.
recent_poststring–One recent post they wrote, used to capture their voice.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server?

MilanAura Authority Check is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.milanaura.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-milanaura-authority-check 'https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server?

MilanAura Authority Check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.milanaura/authority-check. Free Authority Check of a professional profile: strengths, biggest gap, first action, a post. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.milanaura.app/mcp).

Is the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server safe to use?

MilanAura Authority Check scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server expose?

MilanAura Authority Check exposes 2 tools: run_authority_check, get_authority_check_result. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 387 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to MilanAura Authority Check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the MilanAura Authority Check MCP server still maintained?

MilanAura Authority Check is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.