Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

AI Text Checker by carrierscan

REMOTE · CARRIERSCAN.APP

Check if AI wrote a text: English, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Estonian, Georgian, Lithuanian.

Available components

+3 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 79% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 183 tokens (~183/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
  • Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “check_ai_text” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +5
    • HTTPS: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://carrierscan.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=carrierscan.app CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 15 Oct 2026 13 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 198aaa05adc3f9fe0e41573f34906f8b
SANs: carrierscan.app, www.carrierscan.app, *.www.carrierscan.app
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of carrierscan.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
carrierscan.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://carrierscan.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://carrierscan.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://carrierscan.app/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~142 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_ai_text ~142

Checks whether a text (50-2,000 words) looks AI-written, for example by ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude. Languages: English, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Estonian, Georgian, Lithuanian. Each language other than English is checked by our own detector trained on that language. Returns an AI likelihood for the whole text and for each part. Detectors make mistakes, so the result is a likelihood, not proof. Text is not stored.

NameTypeReqDescription
textstringyesText to check, 50-2,000 words, in one of: English, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Estonian, Georgian, Lithuanian

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server?

AI Text Checker by carrierscan is a hosted endpoint at https://carrierscan.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · carrierscan.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http app-carrierscan-ai-text-checker 'https://carrierscan.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server?

AI Text Checker by carrierscan is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.carrierscan/ai-text-checker. Check if AI wrote a text: English, Ukrainian, Kazakh, Uzbek, Estonian, Georgian, Lithuanian. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://carrierscan.app/mcp).

Is the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server safe to use?

AI Text Checker by carrierscan scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server expose?

AI Text Checker by carrierscan exposes 1 tool: check_ai_text. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 142 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to AI Text Checker by carrierscan without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the AI Text Checker by carrierscan MCP server still maintained?

AI Text Checker by carrierscan is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.