Awardia
REMOTE · AWARDIA.APP
EU public tenders for AI agents: open tenders, award history, competitors and bid intelligence.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 70% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1653 tokens (~236/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
- Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 23 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “bid_intelligence” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “bid_intelligence” reworded the description of “tender_id” cosmetic
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_coverage” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
- “expiring_contracts” reworded the description of “limit” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://awardia.app/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=awardia.app | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 3 Oct 2026 | 1 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 843e42ebed39ec570e648588dda165af |
| SANs: awardia.app, *.awardia.app | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of awardia.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| awardia.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://awardia.app/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://awardia.app/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
award_history ~247
Free during beta. Who won past public contracts, at what price, against how many bidders, and by which procedure (open call, prior consultation, direct award). Filter by buyer, winner, CPV sector and region. For Portugal covers every public contract (Portal BASE), incl. small direct awards. Returns summary stats, top winners and recent awards.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| buyer | string | – | Part of the contracting authority's name |
| countries | array | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes where the work is performed, e.g. ["PT","ES"] |
| cpv_prefixes | array | – | CPV code prefixes; '45' = construction, '72' = IT services, '3021' = computers |
| limit | integer | – | Max results, default 10, max 25 |
| region | string | – | Place name: district or municipality (e.g. 'Lisboa', 'Sintra'). Matches the work location or the buyer's name; most precise for Portugal. |
| since | string | – | ISO date, e.g. 2024-01-01 |
| winner | string | – | Part of the winning company's name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
bid_intelligence ~237
Free during beta. Should I bid, and at what price? For an open tender (tender_id from search_tenders/match_company, or a pasted tender link) or a buyer+sector, analyses comparable past contracts: typical number of bidders, share of single-bid contests, how far below the estimate winners bid, a price range for this tender, incumbents, the companies that most often bid (with win rates), how often the buyer awards without an open call, and recent awards. Compares with the same buyer and sector, else the same kind of work nearby (district). States its sample size. Does not read the tender documents.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| buyer | string | – | Buyer name or tax id (if no tender_id) |
| country | string | – | ISO alpha-2 country, e.g. PT |
| cpv | string | – | CPV code or prefix of the sector (if no tender_id) |
| tender_id | string | – | Id of an open tender, e.g. '673746-2026', or a link to it (awardia.app/t/…, TED or Portal BASE page) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
competitor_profile ~182
Free during beta. What a company wins in public procurement: contracts won, value, buyers, sectors, countries, typical discount below estimate, competition level, procedures and regions, recent wins with base price, % below it and award criteria; for Portugal also every contest it entered, its win rate, its most frequent rivals (who beat whom) and its recent losses. Search by name or tax id (NIF). These are public records: report facts, not conclusions about wrongdoing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | yes | Company name (part is fine) or tax id, e.g. 'B46012696' |
| countries | array | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes where the work is performed, e.g. ["PT","ES"] |
| since | string | – | ISO date, e.g. 2025-01-01 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
expiring_contracts ~217
Free during beta. Public contracts whose term ends soon, so the buyer will likely re-tender: a sales pipeline before tenders are published. Returns buyer, incumbent supplier(s), value, start and expected end date.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| buyer | string | – | Part of the buyer's name |
| countries | array | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes where the work is performed, e.g. ["PT","ES"] |
| cpv_prefixes | array | – | CPV code prefixes; '45' = construction, '72' = IT services, '3021' = computers |
| limit | integer | – | Max results, default 10, max 50 |
| min_value | number | – | Minimum awarded value |
| months_ahead | integer | – | Look-ahead window, default 12 months |
| region | string | – | Place name: district or municipality (e.g. 'Lisboa', 'Sintra'). Matches the work location or the buyer's name; most precise for Portugal. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_coverage ~43
FREE. What data Awardia holds: sources, countries, date range, number of open tenders and award notices. Useful to check before searching a country or period.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
match_company ~154
Free during beta. Describe a company in plain words (what it sells, where). Returns the open public tenders it could bid on, best match first, each with 'competition' signals from the buyer's past contracts (median bidders, single-bid share, % below estimate).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_description | string | yes | e.g. 'We install solar panels and EV chargers for municipalities'. English matches tenders in every EU language; adding key terms in the target country's language improves recall. |
| countries | array | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes where the work is performed, e.g. ["PT","ES"] |
| limit | integer | – | Max results, default 10, max 25 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_tenders ~381
Free during beta. Find OPEN public tenders (deadline still in the future) by keywords, country, region, CPV sector and value. EU-wide from TED; for Portugal also every national call for tender of any value (Diário da República). Returns title, buyer, country, region, CPV codes, estimated value, submission deadline, official link and tender documents link, plus 'competition': how contested this buyer's past contracts in the same kind of work were (median bidders, single-bid share, median % below the estimate, sample size). Use bid_intelligence for a price range and rivals. If nothing matches exactly, it widens (the place's whole district, then without keywords, then without the place) and says so in 'widened_to' and 'note'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| countries | array | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes where the work is performed, e.g. ["PT","ES"] |
| cpv_prefixes | array | – | CPV code prefixes; '45' = construction, '72' = IT services, '3021' = computers |
| deadline_after | string | – | ISO date; default now |
| keywords | string | – | What you are looking for. English works across all countries (matched via the EU CPV vocabulary); adding the same words in the target country's language (e.g. 'school renovation escola requalificação… |
| limit | integer | – | Max results, default 10, max 25 |
| max_value | number | – | Maximum estimated value |
| min_value | number | – | Minimum estimated value |
| region | string | – | Place name: district or municipality (e.g. 'Lisboa', 'Sintra'). Matches the work location or the buyer's name; most precise for Portugal. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Awardia MCP server?
Awardia is a hosted endpoint at https://awardia.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · awardia.app
claude mcp add --transport http app-awardia-awardia 'https://awardia.app/mcp'
What is the Awardia MCP server?
Awardia is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as app.awardia/awardia. EU public tenders for AI agents: open tenders, award history, competitors and bid intelligence. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://awardia.app/mcp).
Is the Awardia MCP server safe to use?
Awardia scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Awardia MCP server expose?
Awardia exposes 7 tools: get_coverage, search_tenders, match_company, award_history, bid_intelligence, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,461 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Awardia MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Awardia without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Awardia MCP server still maintained?
Awardia is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.