Indonesia Economic & Financial Data
OCI · GHCR.IO/ANYONEO/IDN-ECON-MCP
Indonesian and ASEAN economic data for AI agents: inflation, CPI, GDP, and FX rates vs IDR.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 62% of OCI servers
Category Data and Analytics
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 22 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 532 tokens (~88/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
- Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (12)
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (4)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
- Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
- Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
- Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/anyoneo/idn-econ-mcp@1.0.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ambil_series ~127
Ambil titik data dari satu seri (urut terbaru dulu). Args: series_id: ID seri persis, mis. 'wb:idn:FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG' (pakai 'cari_series' dulu) mulai: periode awal (opsional), mis. '2015' sampai: periode akhir (opsional), mis. '2024' batas: jumlah maksimum titik data (default 200)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| batas | integer | – | – |
| mulai | – | – | – |
| sampai | – | – | – |
| series_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
banding_asean ~96
Bandingkan satu indikator antar negara ASEAN (IDN, MYS, THA, VNM, PHL, SGP). Args: indikator: 'inflasi' atau 'cpi' (indeks harga konsumen) atau 'pertanian' (nilai tambah pertanian % PDB) mulai: periode awal (opsional)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| indikator | string | – | – |
| mulai | – | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
cari_series ~89
Cari seri data ekonomi berdasarkan kata kunci (Indonesia, ASEAN, inflasi, PDB, kurs, dll). Args: q: kata kunci pencarian, mis. 'inflasi', 'PDB', 'kurs', 'pertanian', 'Indonesia' batas: jumlah maksimum hasil (default 15)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| batas | integer | – | – |
| q | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
cek_server ~27
Cek kesehatan server dan ringkasan isi basis data (jumlah seri, rentang periode).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
daftar_indikator ~26
Daftar semua indikator yang tersedia beserta jumlah seri dan cakupan negaranya.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
kurs_terkini ~104
Kurs terkini terhadap Rupiah dari data ECB (mis. USD/IDR, EUR/IDR, SGD/IDR, CNY/IDR). Args: base: mata uang asal, mis. 'USD', 'EUR', 'SGD', 'CNY', 'JPY', 'MYR' quote: mata uang tujuan (default 'IDR')
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| base | string | – | – |
| quote | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server?
Indonesia Economic & Financial Data runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/anyoneo/idn-econ-mcp:1.0.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/anyoneo/idn-econ-mcp
claude mcp add anyoneo-idn-econ -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/anyoneo/idn-econ-mcp:1.0.0
What is the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server?
Indonesia Economic & Financial Data is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.anYoneo/idn-econ. Indonesian and ASEAN economic data for AI agents: inflation, CPI, GDP, and FX rates vs IDR. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/anyoneo/idn-econ-mcp).
Is the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server safe to use?
Indonesia Economic & Financial Data scores 44 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server expose?
Indonesia Economic & Financial Data exposes 6 tools: cek_server, cari_series, ambil_series, kurs_terkini, banding_asean, daftar_indikator. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 469 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server still maintained?
Indonesia Economic & Financial Data is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Indonesia Economic & Financial Data MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on Indonesia Economic & Financial Data, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 8 more. 4 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Indonesia Economic & Financial Data: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts and Dependency health. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a container image, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.