githippo
MCPB · GITHIPPO-3.9.3.MCPB
Long-term memory for Claude: Markdown in a git repo you own. Survives context compaction.
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 84% of MCPB servers
Category Memory and Knowledge
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security23
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs were checked across the 92 of 92 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 30 of 92 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency42
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Maintenance history not yet determined.Unverified
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 668 tokens (~66/item across 10 items; 8 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 13% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 −1
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 25 Oct 26 +1
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/AnxovatomicaES/githippo/releases/download/v3.9.3/githippo-3.9.3.mcpb@3.9.3
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 92 packages
| Packages resolved | 92 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 30 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
checkpoint ~64
Save working state (task/state/next) so it survives compaction; call with no args to resume.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| files | array | – | – |
| next | string | – | – |
| session | string | – | – |
| state | string | – | – |
| task | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
files ~84
Raw file access. op: list|read|write|edit|delete. Writes need v (version from read) or v=new.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| content | string | – | – |
| new | string | – | – |
| old | string | – | – |
| op | string | yes | – |
| path | string | – | – |
| paths | array | – | – |
| v | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
forget ~34
Remove one fact (exact text). Only when the user asks.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
graph ~33
An entity's typed relations to people, projects, decisions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| depth | integer | – | – |
| entity | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
history ~43
Change log of an entity's memory, or its content as of a past date (at=ISO date).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| at | string | – | – |
| entity | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
maintain ~65
Health report, homes for inbox facts. tidy moves them; reindex; decay archives stale; rewrite=path merges dupes (LLM).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| decay | boolean | – | – |
| reindex | boolean | – | – |
| rewrite | string | – | – |
| tidy | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
recall ~76
Search memory by meaning+keywords, any language; follows entity links. mode=brief lists refs only (cheapest).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | integer | – | max tokens, default 1000 |
| mode | string | – | – |
| q | string | yes | – |
| scope | string | – | folder prefix, e.g. projects/ or sessions/ |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
remember ~88
Save one durable fact. Auto-files it, dedupes, links entities. pin=true adds it to always-loaded core memory.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| about | string | – | entity it concerns; created if new |
| fact | string | yes | – |
| kind | string | – | – |
| pin | boolean | – | – |
| replaces | string | – | exact old line it supersedes |
| source | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the githippo MCP server?
githippo ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, 312af329a3e0192b21b19540d9ab0302b046ec67d5bc0dda755a40f9ca94f683; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · githippo-3.9.3.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
312af329a3e0192b21b19540d9ab0302b046ec67d5bc0dda755a40f9ca94f683
macOS / Linux
echo "312af329a3e0192b21b19540d9ab0302b046ec67d5bc0dda755a40f9ca94f683 githippo-3.9.3.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\githippo-3.9.3.mcpb).Hash -eq "312af329a3e0192b21b19540d9ab0302b046ec67d5bc0dda755a40f9ca94f683"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the githippo MCP server?
githippo is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AnxovatomicaES/githippo. Long-term memory for Claude: Markdown in a git repo you own. Survives context compaction. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/AnxovatomicaES/githippo/releases/download/v3.9.3/githippo-3.9.3.mcpb).
Is the githippo MCP server safe to use?
githippo scores 52 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the githippo MCP server expose?
githippo exposes 8 tools: recall, remember, forget, graph, history, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 487 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the githippo MCP server under?
githippo declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.