io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp
NUGET · ZPHIL.RESHARPERCLI · SCANNED SEP 20
ReSharper CLI inspection/cleanup via MCP. Unofficial: not affiliated with or endorsed by JetBrains.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 11 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1325 tokens (~265/item across 5 items; 3 tools + 2 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp runs locally as a NuGet package, launched with dnx Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0 --yes. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
nuget · Zphil.ReSharperCli
claude mcp add andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp -- dnx Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0 --yes
{
"mcpServers": {
"andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp": {
"command": "dnx",
"args": [
"Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0",
"--yes"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp": {
"command": "dnx",
"args": [
"Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0",
"--yes"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp -- dnx Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0 --yes
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"dnx",
"Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0",
"--yes"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} mcp_servers:
andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp:
command: "dnx"
args: ["Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0", "--yes"] {
"McpServers": {
"andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "dnx",
"Arguments": [
"Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0",
"--yes"
]
}
}
} {
"mcpServers": {
"andypgray-resharper-cli-mcp": {
"command": "dnx",
"args": [
"Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0",
"--yes"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 13 Sept 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
- 12 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed nuget/Zphil.ReSharperCli@1.7.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | nuget |
| Reason | Signature present, unreadable |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
resharper_cleanup ReSharper Cleanup Code ~203
Run ReSharper code cleanup to reformat and normalize files in place. Each call analyses the whole solution whatever the file count, so make one call per task with every modified file in it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| files | array | yes | File paths to clean up. Each is relative to the solution root, or absolute. jb matches them against the files that belong to a project in the solution, so one that is on disk but in no project matche… |
| profile | string | – | ReSharper cleanup profile name. Defaults to the profile the solution declares, else full cleanup. |
| solutionPath | string | – | Path to the .sln/.slnx to run against. Overrides JB_SOLUTION_PATH and working-directory discovery. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resharper_inspect ReSharper Inspect Code ~387
Run ReSharper static analysis on the solution and return the code issues it finds.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| detail | string | – | Cap on the detail the response carries: Full, the default, lists every issue on its own line, and Minimal is one line of totals. Rendering starts at this level and never goes above it, but still step… |
| files | array | – | Ant-style globs narrowing the findings to matching files, for example src/**/*.cs. The analysis stays solution-wide, so a scoped run is no faster. Each is relative to the solution root, or absolute.… |
| report | string | – | Write the complete itemised findings to a file, and name it in the response. Markdown lists every issue with its own message, which is what the response listing collapses once a solution-wide run exc… |
| severity | string | – | Minimum severity to report. Error is ReSharper's compilation-error level, not a tier of high-priority warnings; raising to it usually reports nothing. |
| solutionPath | string | – | Path to the .sln/.slnx to run against. Overrides JB_SOLUTION_PATH and working-directory discovery. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resharper_reset_cache ReSharper Reset Cache ~156
Delete this solution's ReSharper analysis cache so the next inspect or cleanup rebuilds it from cold. The cure for inspect reporting compilation errors a successful build does not: a stale index serves those until the cache is dropped. Build first, because on a checkout that was never built or restored the errors are real and a reset only adds a cold analysis to the build it still needs. Costs the next call a full cold analysis, so it is not routine maintenance. A deleted checkout's cache outlives it: pass its old solution path as solutionPath to reclaim it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| solutionPath | string | – | Path to the .sln/.slnx to run against. Overrides JB_SOLUTION_PATH and working-directory discovery. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp. ReSharper CLI inspection/cleanup via MCP. Unofficial: not affiliated with or endorsed by JetBrains. This page covers its NuGet package (Zphil.ReSharperCli).
Is the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server expose?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp exposes 3 tools: resharper_reset_cache, resharper_cleanup, resharper_inspect. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 746 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp server under?
io.github.andypgray/resharper-cli-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.