Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

VendorIndex

REMOTE · MCP.VENDORINDEX.DEV

Rank vendors/libraries per use case from verified pricing, agent-friction and health.

55 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 43% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 444 tokens (~74/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 3 Nov 26 54

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=vendorindex.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 3 Nov 2026 1 Feb 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 28831ebbac26eb9913b1e3081f5738f7
SANs: vendorindex.dev, mcp.vendorindex.dev, *.mcp.vendorindex.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.vendorindex.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
vendorindex.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~372 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_vendors ~63

Side-by-side comparison of several vendors for one category + use case: weighted totals, per-dimension scores and health trend. Use for head-to-head questions.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyes–
use_casestringyes–
vendorsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_category_ranking ~80

Get the ranked vendors for a category, scored per use case (deterministic, from verified pricing + agent-friction + health). Omit use_case to get the ranking for every use case in the category. Returns each vendor's weighted total and per-dimension scores.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyes–
use_casestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_vendor ~50

Full detail for one vendor: cited pricing (structured rates + source URL + verified date + confidence), agent-friction checks, SDKs, capabilities, portability and health signals.

NameTypeReqDescription
vendorstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_categories ~58

List every vendor category VendorIndex covers (e.g. transactional-email, llm-models, embeddings-apis, llm-gateways), each with its use cases and vendor count. Call this first to discover valid category and use_case ids.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

recommend ~69

Recommend the top vendors for a specific category + use case, with the reasoning (which dimensions drove the pick). Best when an agent needs a single answer to 'what should I use for X?'.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyes–
limitinteger––
use_casestringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_vendors ~52

Find vendors by free-text query across name, id, category and capability (e.g. 'embedding', 'soc2', 'fast_inference'). Returns matches with their categories.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the VendorIndex MCP server?

VendorIndex is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.vendorindex.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http andy-chak-vendorindex 'https://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the VendorIndex MCP server?

VendorIndex is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.andy-chak/vendorindex. Rank vendors/libraries per use case from verified pricing, agent-friction and health. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.vendorindex.dev/mcp).

Is the VendorIndex MCP server safe to use?

VendorIndex scores 55 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the VendorIndex MCP server expose?

VendorIndex exposes 6 tools: list_categories, get_category_ranking, recommend, get_vendor, compare_vendors, search_vendors. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 372 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the VendorIndex MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to VendorIndex without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the VendorIndex MCP server still maintained?

VendorIndex is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.