io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp
NPM · JEV-DECISION-MCP · SCANNED SEP 24
Typed Jev decisions in one batched tool: choice, score, and yes/no probabilities.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security48
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 209 tokens (~209/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y jev-decision-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · jev-decision-mcp
claude mcp add amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp -- npx -y jev-decision-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"jev-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"jev-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp -- npx -y jev-decision-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"jev-decision-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg jev-decision-mcp
mcp_servers:
amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "jev-decision-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"jev-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y jev-decision-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"amidabuddha-jev-decision-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"jev-decision-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Package version: 0.1.2 → 0.1.3 functional
- 23 Sept 26 81
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/jev-decision-mcp@0.1.3
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp/.github/workflows/publish-npm.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.3 |
| Rekor log index | 2931586939 |
| Predicate type | https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:706893f25f4bfbd7a769cd2aa2d5c1a6ba1fc6008ca1cb68cc21173df7df128a734e40516eb4fe02949e26b699816a4b76b1282baa38982923836584f |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 96 packages
| Packages resolved | 96 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
jev_decide Ask Jev for typed decisions ~209
Evaluate supplied context using TypeSafe Jev. Batch independent, narrow questions in one call: choice selects a provided label; score returns a position on 2–10 ordered levels (0-based); noul returns probability of yes, not intensity. Supply relevant evidence and full instructions; question IDs are not sent to the model. Include an other/none choice when appropriate. Questions cannot use each other's answers. Returns raw judgments, probabilities, confidence for choice/score, and token usage. Use caller-defined policies for uncertainty. This sends the supplied state and questions to TypeSafe and may incur API charges. It does not execute selected actions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | string | – | Optional TypeSafe model override; defaults to the configured model or jev-latest. |
| questions | object | yes | Named independent questions over the same state. IDs are not model instructions; write each full judgment in instructions. |
| state | – | yes | Relevant source text or JSON context; include evidence, definitions and policies needed for the questions. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answers | object | yes | – |
| model | string | yes | – |
| usage | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp. Typed Jev decisions in one batched tool: choice, score, and yes/no probabilities. This page covers its npm package (jev-decision-mcp).
Is the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 24 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server expose?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp exposes 1 tool: jev_decide. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 209 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp server under?
io.github.amidabuddha/jev-decision-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.