Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ResiliReplay

NPM · RESILIREPLAY

Run bounded, deterministic MCP reliability tests and generate executable regressions.

Available components

0 this week 93 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 96% of npm servers

Category Testing and QA

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to aliengineering-byte/resilireplay). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 61 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 321 tokens (~29/item across 11 items; 10 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 18 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 −2
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/resilireplay@0.7.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo aliengineering-byte/resilireplay
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/aliengineering-byte/resilireplay/.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.7.1
Rekor log index 2705755332
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:670d72010c6816f628374b65563613d3988c01500ce16ffa0dc83d12ef46ca323d5b9e225fca45e271eaab66004fb88b9f191729fe026320cdb8e0335

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~307 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
resilireplay_capture_start ~23

Explicitly arm bounded, sanitized, project-local passive capture.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_capture_stop ~18

Stop passive capture without deleting evidence.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_generate_regression ~42

Write an executable regression only when the caller confirms the exact evidence hash.

NameTypeReqDescription
confirmedEvidenceIdstringyes–
outputstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_inspect_config ~41

Return a sanitized, value-free execution plan for one project-local MCP server.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyes–
serverstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_last_failure ~21

Return the last bounded, sanitized supported failure evidence.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_list_faults ~21

List deterministic fault types without executing a target.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_run_campaign ~53

Run only a campaign whose exact reviewed hash is supplied; target calls retain campaign allowlists.

NameTypeReqDescription
allowRemoteboolean––
confirmedCampaignHashstringyes–
pathstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_status ~19

Report the local version and passive capture state.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_validate_campaign ~32

Validate a project-local campaign and return its confirmation hash without running it.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

resilireplay_verify_evidence ~37

Fail closed unless project-local campaign or MCP demo evidence has a valid schema and integrity hash.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ResiliReplay MCP server?

ResiliReplay runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y resilireplay. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · resilireplay

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add aliengineering-byte-resilireplay -- npx -y resilireplay
Common questions

What is the ResiliReplay MCP server?

ResiliReplay is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.aliengineering-byte/resilireplay. Run bounded, deterministic MCP reliability tests and generate executable regressions. This page covers its npm package (resilireplay).

Is the ResiliReplay MCP server safe to use?

ResiliReplay scores 93 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ResiliReplay MCP server expose?

ResiliReplay exposes 10 tools: resilireplay_status, resilireplay_list_faults, resilireplay_inspect_config, resilireplay_validate_campaign, resilireplay_verify_evidence, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 307 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the ResiliReplay MCP server still maintained?

ResiliReplay is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the ResiliReplay MCP server under?

ResiliReplay declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.