Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp

REMOTE · REVETTR.COM · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20

Counterparty risk scoring for agentic commerce via x402 micropayments.

0 this week 77 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 428 tokens (~142/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server?

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp is a hosted endpoint at https://revettr.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · revettr.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp 'https://revettr.com/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp": {
      "url": "https://revettr.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://revettr.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp]
url = "https://revettr.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://revettr.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp --url 'https://revettr.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp:
    url: "https://revettr.com/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://revettr.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://revettr.com/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alexanderlawson17-revettr-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://revettr.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 26 Aug 26 +1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 24 Aug 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 7 Aug 26 0
    • The server no longer declares the “experimental” capability functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 30 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://revettr.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=revettr.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 26 Jul 2026 24 Oct 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5273a7b778b648be070e366948aab102d42
SANs: revettr.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of revettr.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
revettr.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' https://fastapi.tiangolo.com data:; connect-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://revettr.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://revettr.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://revettr.com/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~372 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
export_audit_bundle ~186

Export a JWS-signed audit-trail bundle of scoring decisions for a wallet. MCP equivalent of GET /v1/audit/export. Compliance artifact for EU AI Act Article 12 logging / NYDFS certification / debanking-defense. Because audit data covers arbitrary wallets, this tool is operator-gated: pass the operator's ``admin_token`` (checked against ``REVETTR_ADMIN_TOKEN``). Disabled when that env var is unset. Note: ``admin_token`` travels in the MCP request payload, so operators should treat MCP transcripts/logs as sensitive. Verify the returned ``bundle_jws`` against /.well-known/jwks.json; the schema is in docs/audit-trail-export.md.

NameTypeReqDescription
admin_tokenstringyes
end
start
wallet_addressstringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

score_counterparty ~83

Score a counterparty before sending money. Returns risk score 0-100. Accepts EVM wallets (0x...), Stellar wallets (G...), domains, IPs, and company names.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainstring
company_name
domain
ip
stellar_wallet
wallet_address

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

verify_issuer ~103

Get an advisory risk verdict for a validated MCP issuer (iss). Attach this at your MCP `iss` validation step: identity is your job, this adds risk. Returns the same signed RiskCheckResult as POST /v1/iss-verdict. Advisory and non-blocking — you decide based on the tier.

NameTypeReqDescription
chainstring
issstringyes
iss_kindstring
wallet_address

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server?

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp. Counterparty risk scoring for agentic commerce via x402 micropayments. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://revettr.com/mcp).

Is the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server expose?

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp exposes 3 tools: score_counterparty, verify_issuer, export_audit_bundle. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 372 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server require authentication?

No. We connected to io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.AlexanderLawson17/revettr-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.