glin
PYPI · GLIN-ML
Exactly explainable classifiers for agents: train, tune, predict, explain on CSV or Excel.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of PyPI servers
Category AI and Machine Learning
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 42 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to AkashChatterjee/glin). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1858 tokens (~265/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management17
- Stability observed for 5 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 −14
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 18 Oct 26 0
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 299 → 265 ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Destructive annotations: pass → 100 functional
- Package version: 0.1.4 → 0.1.5 functional
- 17 Oct 26 +44
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 0 functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- 14 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to compare. security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool text to scan. security
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to assess. functional
- Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
- 13 Oct 26 +26
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Dependency health: unverified → 0.99 ▲ functional
- 12 Oct 26 23
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/glin-ml@0.1.5
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | AkashChatterjee/glin |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/AkashChatterjee/glin/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.5 |
| Rekor log index | 3312887468 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:e8c774d86f80c3d3c4392f7ff9529e1c16332d62533fb2fbc61b804ac6cb163f |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 42 packages
| Packages resolved | 42 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
delete_model ~62
Permanently delete a trained model and its saved files. This cannot be undone; confirm with the user before you call it. To replace a model with a new one, call `train_model` with overwrite=True instead.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model_name | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
explain_model ~146
Global view of what a trained model learned, exact rather than sampled from example predictions: every feature ranked by its mean absolute contribution to the log-odds (`features`, with main-effect vs interaction split), the top terms including pairwise interactions (`terms`, each with its share of the total), and, for binary targets, a `shape` per main effect showing which categories or value ranges push the prediction up or down. Use this to answer "what drives this model" instead of running `predict` on a handful of rows.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_shapes | boolean | – | – |
| model_name | string | yes | – |
| top_n | integer | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
inspect_model ~30
Return feature names, types, and target classes for a trained model.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model_name | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_hyperparameters ~67
Every EBM training hyperparameter `train_model` accepts in its `hyperparameters` argument: name, type, default, allowed range, and what raising/lowering it does. Fetch the `tune_model_hyperparameters` prompt for a search strategy built on these.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_models ~19
List all trained glin models available on this machine.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
predict ~249
Predicted class and probabilities, plus the full glassbox audit: `base_logit` (the intercept), every contributing feature's exact score (sorted by magnitude), and an additivity check verifying the scores sum to the model's own predicted probabilities (`reconstructed_probability` vs `model_probability`, both keyed by class name). For binary targets scores and `base_logit` are log-odds of `score_class` (`target_classes[1]`; positive pushes toward it, negative toward the other class); multiclass reports per-class scores and a per-class `base_logit`. `warnings` names inputs the model never saw (unseen categories, numerics or dates outside the training range, unparseable numbers or dates); treat the prediction as less reliable when present. `missing_features` lists absent inputs, which are valid but worth mentioning. Pass a date column as its raw value (e.g. "2024-03-06"); glin derives the `<col>__<part>` terms shown in `contributions` itself.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| features | object | yes | – |
| model_name | string | yes | – |
| top_n | integer | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
train_model ~1,285
Train an EBM classifier from a CSV or Excel file and save it as model_name. This is also how to retrain an existing model: pass overwrite=True to replace it with a freshly trained model (e.g. on updated data) -- otherwise a pre-existing model_name is rejected so it isn't silently clobbered. Pass exactly one of: - csv_path: a .csv, .xlsx or .xls file inside a directory this server allows (it does the reading itself). Always prefer this -- it works for large files (up to the server's size limit, 200 MB by default) without the calling agent ever having to read or reproduce the file's contents itself. Excel files need the optional `glin-ml[excel]` install. - csv_content: the complete raw CSV text (header row + data rows). Only use this when there's no file on disk to point at, e.g. data pasted into the chat or assembled in memory. Do not use this for large files -- having an agent inline tens of thousands of rows as a tool-call argument is slow, burns enormous context, and risks truncation. Prefer writing the data to a file the server can see (csv_path) whenever that's possible instead. Excel only (csv_path ending in .xlsx/.xls): `sheet` picks the sheet by name or 1-based position (required when the workbook has several sheets). The header row is auto-detected, skipping title/banner rows and trailing footnote rows (mostly empty rows whose text starts with Source, Note, *, or is a long sentence; `warnings` names the dropped rows); if that is ambiguous the error says so. For multi-row or merged headers set `header_rows` to the 1-based sheet row numbers as shown in Excel: 4, "3-4" or [3, 4]; they are flattened into unique column names and data starts below them. The result reports the `sheet` and `header_rows` actually used. Either way, this tool does no cleanup of its own beyond what EBMTabularPreprocessor already does automatically (coercing dirty numeric formatting such as currency symbols, thousands separators and trailing % -- percentages sta…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| csv_content | – | – | – |
| csv_path | – | – | – |
| header_rows | – | – | – |
| holdout_fraction | number | – | – |
| holdout_group_column | – | – | – |
| hyperparameters | – | – | – |
| model_name | string | yes | – |
| overwrite | boolean | – | – |
| sheet | – | – | – |
| suppression_codes | – | – | – |
| target_column | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the glin MCP server?
glin runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx glin-ml. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · glin-ml
claude mcp add akashchatterjee-glin -- uvx glin-ml
What is the glin MCP server?
glin is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AkashChatterjee/glin. Exactly explainable classifiers for agents: train, tune, predict, explain on CSV or Excel. This page covers its PyPI package (glin-ml).
Is the glin MCP server safe to use?
glin scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 22 October 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the glin MCP server expose?
glin exposes 7 tools: list_models, inspect_model, predict, explain_model, list_hyperparameters, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,858 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the glin MCP server still maintained?
glin is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the glin MCP server under?
glin declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.