RugShield 402
REMOTE · RUGSHIELD-402.ONRENDER.COM
Real-time token contract safety scanner and honeypot auditor via x402 on Base.
Available components
Last scanned (10 hours ago)
Scores higher than 56% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1062 tokens (~88/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability check failed: schema churn in the 3 days we've observed: 2 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 11 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof" implies "execute" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Oct 26 −1
- Tool “rugshield_audit_cross_chain_bridge_risk” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rugshield_audit_holder_cluster_map” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rugshield_audit_liquidity_lock_verify” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rugshield_pre_swap_scan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rugshield_risk_institutional_token_report” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 494 → 1062 ▼ functional
- Server version: 1.2.0 → 1.3.0 functional
- New tool “rugshield_profiler_address_current_balance” functional
- New tool “rugshield_smart_money_dex_trades” functional
- New tool “rugshield_smart_money_netflow” functional
- New tool “rugshield_tgm_holders” functional
- New tool “rugshield_tgm_who_bought_sold” functional
- New tool “rugshield_token_screener” functional
- “rugshield_audit_cross_chain_bridge_risk” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- “rugshield_audit_holder_cluster_map” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- “rugshield_audit_liquidity_lock_verify” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- “rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- “rugshield_pre_swap_scan” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- “rugshield_risk_institutional_token_report” reworded the description of “token_address” cosmetic
- 17 Oct 26 +8
- Stability: 0.03 → fail ▼ security
- Tool “analyze_liquidity” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “check_honeypot” was removed ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Tool “rugshield_pre_swap_scan” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 109 → 82 ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: 43% → 100% ▲ functional
- Destructive annotations: pass → 0 functional
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.2.0 functional
- New tool “rugshield_audit_cross_chain_bridge_risk” functional
- New tool “rugshield_audit_holder_cluster_map” functional
- New tool “rugshield_audit_liquidity_lock_verify” functional
- New tool “rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof” functional
- New tool “rugshield_risk_institutional_token_report” functional
- “rugshield_pre_swap_scan” dropped the optional parameter “chain_id” cosmetic
- “rugshield_pre_swap_scan” dropped the optional parameter “simulate_sell” cosmetic
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 15 Oct 26 59
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of rugshield-402.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
rugshield_audit_cross_chain_bridge_risk ~85
Audits canonical Base bridge and CCIP/LayerZero endpoints for message replay vulnerabilities, unbacked wrapped collateral, and admin multisig latency. Cost: 0.020 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_audit_holder_cluster_map ~84
Analyzes on-chain funding origins for the top 50 token holders to detect sybil clusters, dev dump risks, and wash-trading rings. Cost: 0.020 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_audit_liquidity_lock_verify ~84
Verifies LP token ownership across Uncx, Team.Finance, and Aerodrome slipstream pools to prove liquidity cannot be pulled. Cost: 0.020 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof ~125
Executes state-override simulation of $1k, $10k, and $50k swap orders on Base Mainnet, calculating exact slippage, gas overhead, and MEV frontrun exposure. Cost: 0.020 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount_usd | number | – | Swap size in USD (e.g. 1000, 10000, 50000) |
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_pre_swap_scan ~81
Simulates buy/sell orders via state overrides to detect honeypots, compute exact transfer taxes in bps, and verify pool liquidity depth. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_profiler_address_current_balance ~83
Profiles any Solana or Base wallet address for current token balances, USD valuation, historical win-rate, and drainer/OFAC taint. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_risk_institutional_token_report ~89
Generates an end-to-end cryptographic audit report covering bytecode decompilation, honeypot tax simulation, LP lock proofs, holder clusters, and bridge risk. Cost: 0.020 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_smart_money_dex_trades ~84
Returns real-time DEX trades executed by labeled smart-money and whale wallets on Solana and Base with pre-trade honeypot verification. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_smart_money_netflow ~79
Tracks institutional and high-win-rate whale wallet net inflows and outflows across Solana SPL and Base ERC-20 tokens. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_tgm_holders ~81
Returns top-10/top-50 holder distribution, LP lock percentage, and coordinated sybil cluster detection for any Solana or Base token. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_tgm_who_bought_sold ~95
Analyzes who bought and sold a specific Solana or Base token over the last 24h, segmented by Smart Money, Whales, Fresh Wallets, and Dev Clusters. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rugshield_token_screener ~92
Screens trending Solana (Pump.fun/Raydium) and Base (Aerodrome/Uniswap V3) tokens with pre-verified honeypot, tax, and liquidity depth metrics. Cost: 0.010 USDC on Base & Solana Mainnet.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| token_address | string | yes | Target ERC-20 contract address on Base (0x...) or Solana SPL Mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the RugShield 402 MCP server?
RugShield 402 is a hosted endpoint at https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · rugshield-402.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http ak10082247-max-rugshield-402 'https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp'
What is the RugShield 402 MCP server?
RugShield 402 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ak10082247-max/rugshield-402. Real-time token contract safety scanner and honeypot auditor via x402 on Base. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rugshield-402.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the RugShield 402 MCP server safe to use?
RugShield 402 scores 66 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the RugShield 402 MCP server expose?
RugShield 402 exposes 12 tools: rugshield_pre_swap_scan, rugshield_audit_liquidity_lock_verify, rugshield_audit_holder_cluster_map, rugshield_audit_swap_simulation_proof, rugshield_audit_cross_chain_bridge_risk, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,062 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the RugShield 402 MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to RugShield 402 without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the RugShield 402 MCP server still maintained?
RugShield 402 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.