io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp
NPM · @AINATIVE/GTM-MCP · SCANNED SEP 21
Full Google Ads, Analytics & Tag Manager lifecycle MCP for AI agents — 57 tools.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security89
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects uuid 9.0.1, reached via googleapis > googleapis-common > uuid. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 71 of 222 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (3 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 41 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 6433 tokens (~112/item across 57 items; 57 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
- Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage92
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 75% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 4 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "gtm_delete_tag" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 57 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @ainative/gtm-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @ainative/gtm-mcp
claude mcp add ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp -- npx -y @ainative/gtm-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@ainative/gtm-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@ainative/gtm-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp -- npx -y @ainative/gtm-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@ainative/gtm-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg @ainative/gtm-mcp
mcp_servers:
ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@ainative/gtm-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@ainative/gtm-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y @ainative/gtm-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"ainative-studio-ainative-gtm-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@ainative/gtm-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 19 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 −4
- Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
- 11 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@ainative/gtm-mcp@0.4.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 2 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-528h-pc64-c93x | CVE-2026-71429 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq | CVE-2026-41907 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 222 packages
| Packages resolved | 222 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 3 |
| Stale | 68 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
gtm_list_containers ~32
List all containers in a GTM account
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | GTM account ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_list_tags ~43
List all tags in a GTM workspace
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
| workspaceId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_list_triggers ~44
List all triggers in a GTM workspace
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
| workspaceId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_list_workspaces ~36
List workspaces in a GTM container
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_publish ~44
Publish the current workspace — makes all changes live immediately
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
| workspaceId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_update_tag ~77
Update an existing GTM tag (e.g. fix its trigger, rename it, update parameters)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
| tagId | string | yes | – |
| updates | object | yes | Partial tag body — only fields to update |
| workspaceId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gtm_update_trigger ~64
Update an existing GTM trigger
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountId | string | yes | – |
| containerId | string | yes | – |
| triggerId | string | yes | – |
| updates | object | yes | Partial trigger body — only fields to update |
| workspaceId | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp. Full Google Ads, Analytics & Tag Manager lifecycle MCP for AI agents, 57 tools. This page covers its npm package (@ainative/gtm-mcp).
Is the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 2 known advisories against it as of 21 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server expose?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp exposes 57 tools: gtm_list_accounts, gtm_list_containers, gtm_get_container, gtm_list_tags, gtm_get_tag, and 52 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 6,433 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp server under?
io.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-gtm-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.