Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner + verdict
REMOTE · WWW.AIDATATOOLS.DEV · SCANNED OCT 4
Post-scrape data cleaner, no LLM: repairs mojibake, HTML, invisible chars. Plus a verdict.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 3 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1324 tokens (~441/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server?
Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… is a hosted endpoint at https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.aidatatools.dev
claude mcp add --transport http aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate 'https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server'
{
"mcpServers": {
"aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate": {
"url": "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate] url = "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate --url 'https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate:
url: "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server" {
"McpServers": {
"aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server"
}
}
} assistant mcp add aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server'
{
"mcpServers": {
"aidatatools-dev-data-quality-gate": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 8 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 6 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 12 Aug 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “clean_scraped_data” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “clean_scraped_data_audited” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 268 → 441 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 268 → 395 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- New tool “clean_scraped_data” functional
- New tool “clean_scraped_data_audited” functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 10 Aug 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.aidatatools.dev | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 8 Aug 2026 | 6 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 67bda8104a9cc0154f67bec03fc04f8caa4 |
| SANs: *.aidatatools.dev, aidatatools.dev | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.aidatatools.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| aidatatools.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_dataset_quality ~195
Call this before using any dataset. Returns a deterministic quality verdict (RELIABLE / USABLE_WITH_CLEANING / UNRELIABLE) with exact facts: completeness, nulls, type consistency, impossible values, duplicates, outliers, and (on financial/trading data) cross-source price divergence. 100% deterministic, no LLM. Free -- this MCP endpoint runs the engine directly; POST /api (plain REST, same engine) is x402-gated at $0.01/call instead. Input: rawJson (a JSON array of row objects, or a single object); datasetId is accepted but not resolvable on this deployment -- pass rawJson instead.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| datasetId | string | – | An Apify dataset id. Not resolvable on this deployment; pass rawJson instead. |
| rawJson | – | – | The dataset: a JSON array of row objects, or a single object. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
clean_scraped_data ~518
PAID TIER, CALLED FROM A FREE ENDPOINT -- READ THIS FIRST: this tool does NOT return your cleaned data, and its response has NO `data` key. It returns {"status": "payment_required", "what_we_found_in_your_data": {...}, "get_the_repaired_data": {...}}. Do not treat its output as cleaned data and do not write it back into your dataset. WHAT YOU GET HERE, FREE: an exact inventory of the defects in YOUR data -- which repair rules would fire, how many values each would change, and which cases cannot be repaired safely and need your decision. HOW TO GET THE REPAIRED DATA: make the one call named in `get_the_repaired_data` -- POST https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/clean, $0.04 via x402, no account, no API key, no signup. That response body IS the cleaned dataset, in the shape you posted it. WHY THE SPLIT: detection is free on this endpoint and always has been (check_dataset_quality reports the same defects). The repaired artifact is the paid product, because it is re-bought on every extraction run rather than cached like a verdict. WHAT THE PAID CALL DOES: removes leftover HTML tags and entities, decodes mojibake ('Café' -> 'Café'), strips invisible characters (zero-width, BOM, soft hyphen), normalises non-breaking spaces and trims values -- across nested objects and arrays too. 100% deterministic, no LLM: the same input always yields byte-identical output, and cleaning twice equals cleaning once. It repairs how data was ENCODED, never what it SAYS: masked placeholders ('N/A', 'None'), near-duplicate rows and failed extractions ('access denied', 'captcha', which mean that record must be re-scraped) are reported with a proposal, never silently deleted or rewritten. The full boundary -- 7 rules applied automatically, 5 needing an explicit opt-in, 8 only ever reported -- is at GET https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/clean.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | object | – | All optional. Every default is the safe one: with no options, the row count, every value's type, and the schema are all guaranteed unchanged. |
| rawJson | – | yes | The scraper output: a JSON array of row objects, a single object, or a CSV/plain-text string. The format is detected and the output mirrors the shape you sent. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
clean_scraped_data_audited ~420
PAID TIER, CALLED FROM A FREE ENDPOINT -- READ THIS FIRST: this tool does NOT return your cleaned data, and its response has NO `data` key. It returns {"status": "payment_required", "what_we_found_in_your_data": {...}, "get_the_repaired_data": {...}}. Do not treat its output as cleaned data and do not write it back into your dataset. WHAT YOU GET HERE, FREE: an exact inventory of the defects in YOUR data -- which repair rules would fire, how many values each would change, and which cases cannot be repaired safely and need your decision. HOW TO GET THE REPAIRED DATA: make the one call named in `get_the_repaired_data` -- POST https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/clean/audit, $0.12 via x402, no account, no API key, no signup. That response body IS the cleaned dataset, in the shape you posted it. WHY THE SPLIT: detection is free on this endpoint and always has been (check_dataset_quality reports the same defects). The repaired artifact is the paid product, because it is re-bought on every extraction run rather than cached like a verdict. WHAT THE PAID CALL DOES: the same repair as clean_scraped_data, plus a complete audit trail: every transformation with its path, rule, before and after value, a replay_id, and input/output SHA-256. The ledger is a full inverse patch -- applying it in reverse reconstructs your original input byte for byte. Use it when you must be able to PROVE later what changed and why.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | object | – | All optional. Every default is the safe one: with no options, the row count, every value's type, and the schema are all guaranteed unchanged. |
| rawJson | – | yes | The scraper output: a JSON array of row objects, a single object, or a CSV/plain-text string. The format is detected and the output mirrors the shape you sent. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server?
Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.aidatatools-dev/data-quality-gate. Post-scrape data cleaner, no LLM: repairs mojibake, HTML, invisible chars. Plus a verdict. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.aidatatools.dev/api/mcp_server).
Is the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server safe to use?
Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server expose?
Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… exposes 3 tools: check_dataset_quality, clean_scraped_data, clean_scraped_data_audited. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,133 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… MCP server still maintained?
Data Quality Gate - deterministic post-scrape cleaner… is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.