ai.projectlaunch/mcp
REMOTE · PROJECTLAUNCH.AI · SCANNED SEP 24
Agent-facing site in pre-launch; agents can read the site and submit intent.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 180 tokens (~45/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
- Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server?
ai.projectlaunch/mcp is a hosted endpoint at https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · projectlaunch.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-projectlaunch-mcp 'https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-projectlaunch-mcp": {
"url": "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"ai-projectlaunch-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.ai-projectlaunch-mcp] url = "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"ai-projectlaunch-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add ai-projectlaunch-mcp --url 'https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
ai-projectlaunch-mcp:
url: "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"ai-projectlaunch-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add ai-projectlaunch-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-projectlaunch-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Sept 2026 · Probed https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=projectlaunch.ai | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 22 Sept 2026 | 21 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | deee19f79a39f6b20ed648727ef105b1 |
| SANs: projectlaunch.ai, staging.projectlaunch.ai, *.staging.projectlaunch.ai | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of projectlaunch.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 3799 | 8 | Verified |
| projectlaunch.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; sandbox |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://projectlaunch.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_pricing Pricing ~29
Machine-readable price table. Every price is currently zero; nothing is charged and no payment is accepted.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_site_overview Site overview ~37
What this site is, which endpoints exist, how to identify yourself, and exactly what is done with anything you submit. Start here.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_intent Describe why you are here ~84
Optional and disclosed. Tell the operator what you came here to do, in at most 4096 bytes. Stored verbatim, never interpreted as instructions, read by a human before any model sees it, and never returned to any client including you. Returns a receipt only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| intent | string | yes | Free text describing your task. Truncated if longer than the limit. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whoami Who am I ~30
Your identity as this site currently sees it. Identity is cryptographic: an unsigned Signature-Agent header is ignored.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server?
ai.projectlaunch/mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as ai.projectlaunch/mcp. Agent-facing site in pre-launch; agents can read the site and submit intent. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://projectlaunch.ai/mcp).
Is the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server safe to use?
ai.projectlaunch/mcp scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server expose?
ai.projectlaunch/mcp exposes 4 tools: get_site_overview, get_pricing, whoami, submit_intent. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 180 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server require authentication?
No. We connected to ai.projectlaunch/mcp without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ai.projectlaunch/mcp server still maintained?
ai.projectlaunch/mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.