Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Hashgrid DNA

REMOTE · DNA.HASHGRID.AI

A search engine that learns from feedback, over embeddings: one tool per API route.

Available components

+3 this week 62 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 44% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1114 tokens (~85/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 2 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "delete_node" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “get_grid” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 75 → 85 ▼ functional
    • Server version: 1.1.0 → 1.2.0 functional
    • New tool “create_grid” functional
    • “create_edge” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “create_node” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “delete_edge” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “delete_node” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “get_edge” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “get_grid” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “get_node” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “list_edges” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “list_nodes” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “put_edge” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “update_edge” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
    • “update_node” added an optional parameter “api_key” cosmetic
  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=dna.hashgrid.ai CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 30 Oct 2026 28 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 64e245aea52d0ba4532b1558242dfdc2055
SANs: dna.hashgrid.ai
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of dna.hashgrid.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
hashgrid.ai. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~1,018 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_edge ~110

POST /nodes/{nid}/edges, the search: from query node `nid`, the best node it has not been shown yet, among those whose key starts with `prefix` ("" for any), stored as a new edge: `id` is the found node's id, `score` is null until you score it (update_edge). Null when nothing is left. Call again for the next.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
nidstringyes–
prefixstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

create_grid ~94

POST /: create a grid, your own space of nodes and scores; no API key needed. Returns its `api_key`, shown only now: pass it as `api_key` to every other tool, or send it as the header `Authorization: Bearer hg-…`. It holds up to `max_nodes` nodes. Each address may create only a few grids a day.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

create_node ~113

POST /nodes: add a node. An item gets a `key`, a path unique in the grid (e.g. "/items/42"), so searches can find it; a query gets none. `emb` is its embedding, 1 to 2048 floats from any model; use one model per grid. Returns its id and key (not its emb, to keep replies short; get_node has it).

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
embarrayyes–
key–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

delete_edge ~57

DELETE /nodes/{nid}/edges/{eid}: forget a result, so it can be suggested again; its score no longer trains.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
eidstringyes–
nidstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

delete_node ~44

DELETE /nodes/{nid}: delete a node and every edge from or to it; its scores no longer train.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
nidstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

get_edge ~54

GET /nodes/{nid}/edges/{eid}: one result of query `nid`, and its score (null if not scored).

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
eidstringyes–
nidstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_grid ~44

GET /: the grid the API key opens: its name, and the most nodes it holds, `max_nodes` (null: no limit).

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_node ~46

GET /nodes/{nid}: a node, with its key (null if it has none) and its embedding `emb`.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
nidstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

list_edges ~100

GET /nodes/{nid}/edges: a query's results so far, each an edge with the found node's `id` and its `score` (null if not scored), in id order. `limit` is 1 to 1024; for the next page, pass the last id as `cursor`.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
cursor–––
limitinteger––
nidstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes–

No examples provided.

list_nodes ~73

GET /nodes: the grid's nodes, each with its id, key and emb, in id order. `limit` is 1 to 1024; for the next page, pass the last id as `cursor`.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
cursor–––
limitinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes–

No examples provided.

put_edge ~100

PUT /nodes/{nid}/edges/{eid}: score how well node `eid` fits query `nid`, from -1 (wrong) to 1 (perfect), creating the edge if DNA never suggested it, e.g. scores you already have. Only scores train DNA; a new score replaces the last.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
eidstringyes–
nidstringyes–
scorenumberyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

update_edge ~82

PATCH /nodes/{nid}/edges/{eid}: score a result of query `nid` that create_edge returned, from -1 (wrong) to 1 (perfect). Only scores train DNA; a new score replaces the last.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
eidstringyes–
nidstringyes–
scorenumberyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

update_node ~101

PATCH /nodes/{nid}: change a node. `key`: a new path, or null to remove it, so the node can no longer be found; leave it out to keep it. `emb`: a new embedding; leave it out to keep it. Its scores keep training, on the new embedding. Returns its id and key.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_key–––
emb–––
key–––
nidstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Hashgrid DNA MCP server?

Hashgrid DNA is a hosted endpoint at https://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · dna.hashgrid.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-hashgrid-dna 'https://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Hashgrid DNA MCP server?

Hashgrid DNA is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.hashgrid/dna. A search engine that learns from feedback, over embeddings: one tool per API route. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://dna.hashgrid.ai/mcp).

Is the Hashgrid DNA MCP server safe to use?

Hashgrid DNA scores 62 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Hashgrid DNA MCP server expose?

Hashgrid DNA exposes 13 tools: create_grid, get_grid, list_nodes, get_node, create_node, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,018 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Hashgrid DNA MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Hashgrid DNA without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Hashgrid DNA MCP server still maintained?

Hashgrid DNA is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.