Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ai.hanria/check

REMOTE · CHECK.HANRIA.AI

Check a proposed agent action against operator's rules: permit, deny or escalate, with the clause.

Available components

+3 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 88% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Deprecated

This server is marked deprecated in the MCP registry. The registry records this reason: Renamed to ai.hanria/agent-mandate-check.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability94
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 501 tokens (~71/item across 7 items; 2 tools + 5 resources), lean.Pass
  • Tools include usage examples.Pass
Stability & Change Management83
  • Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Oct 26 0
    • Server version: 0.7.1 → 0.7.4 functional
  • 10 Oct 26 +2
    • Server version: 0.6.1 → 0.7.1 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://check.hanria.ai/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=hanria.ai CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 28 Sept 2026 27 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 77d24efb55d0d9970eedaec4f64c32f5
SANs: hanria.ai, check.hanria.ai, *.check.hanria.ai
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of check.hanria.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 3799 8 Verified
hanria.ai. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://check.hanria.ai/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://check.hanria.ai/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~412 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_action ~236

Call this before your agent does something consequential (sends, pays, deletes, publishes, installs or changes access). Pass mandate (the operator's rules; the first matching clause decides) and action (kind, verb, target, optional counterparty and amount). Returns permit, deny or escalate with the governing clause, a reason, an action digest and a signed receipt; treat error as deny. Advisory: it cannot stop an action, and it keeps no request content. To check a new mandate first, call validate_mandate. Examples: inputSchema. Docs: https://hanria.ai/llms.txt

NameTypeReqDescription
actionobjectyesA typed description of a proposed operation, submitted by an agent to a local HANRIA runtime. MUST NOT contain credentials, secrets, private keys, or tokens.
mandateobjectyesAn operator-authored statement of what an agent may do. Written by a person, read by an agent, evaluated locally. A mandate is advisory: it describes intended authority and supports a local check, bu…
NameTypeReqDescription
action_digeststring–SHA-256 of hanria-action-v1 followed by the action's canonical JSON.
clausestring–The clause that decided, when one did.
clause_notestring––
mandate_refstring––
outcomestringyesTreat error as deny.
reasonstringyes–
receiptobject–Ed25519-signed receipt binding the outcome to this action and mandate for 15 minutes. Keys and the signed-bytes rule: https://check.hanria.ai/.well-known/hanria-receipt-keys.json
schema_versionstringyes–
{"action":{"justification":"Read the permitted file.","operation":{"kind":"file","target":"/tmp/example","verb":"read"},"requested_by":{"agent":"example-agent"},"schema_version":"0.1-draft"},"mandate":{"clauses":[{"effect":"permit","id":"permit-file","match":{"kind":["file"]}}],"default":"deny","mandate_id":"minimal-permit","purpose":"Permit one file action.","schema_version":"0.2-draft"}}
{"action":{"justification":"Pay the invoiced supplier.","operation":{"amount":{"currency":"USDC","value":"25"},"counterparty":"0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222","kind":"transaction","target":"eip155:11155111/0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111/transfer","verb":"transfer"},"requested_by":{"agent":"example-agent"},"schema_version":"0.1-draft"},"mandate":{"clauses":[{"effect":"permit","id":"small-transfers","match":{"counterparty":["0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222"],"kind":["transaction"],"max_amount":{"currency":"USDC","value":"100"},"target_prefix":["eip155:11155111/0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111/"],"verb":["transfer"]}}],"default":"escalate","mandate_id":"example-payments","purpose":"Permit small transfers to one named recipient on a test network.","schema_version":"0.2-draft"}}
validate_mandate ~176

Call this after writing or editing a mandate, before relying on it. Returns valid true or false with the reason: schema errors, clauses that can never run because an earlier clause already decides them, unbounded prefixes, credential material, and expiry. An invalid mandate makes every check_action call answer error. Once per mandate version is enough; there is no need to call it before every check_action. Free, and it keeps no request content. Docs: https://hanria.ai/llms.txt

NameTypeReqDescription
mandateobjectyesAn operator-authored statement of what an agent may do. Written by a person, read by an agent, evaluated locally. A mandate is advisory: it describes intended authority and supports a local check, bu…
NameTypeReqDescription
clausesinteger––
expiredboolean–True when not_valid_after has passed; check_action then denies everything.
mandate_digeststring–SHA-256 of the mandate's canonical JSON; receipts carry the same value.
mandate_refstring––
reasonstringyes–
schema_versionstringyes–
validbooleanyes–
{"mandate":{"clauses":[{"effect":"permit","id":"permit-file","match":{"kind":["file"]}}],"default":"deny","mandate_id":"minimal-permit","purpose":"Permit one file action.","schema_version":"0.2-draft"}}
Install

How do I install the ai.hanria/check MCP server?

ai.hanria/check is a hosted endpoint at https://check.hanria.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · check.hanria.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-hanria-check 'https://check.hanria.ai/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ai.hanria/check MCP server?

ai.hanria/check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.hanria/check. Check a proposed agent action against operator's rules: permit, deny or escalate, with the clause. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://check.hanria.ai/mcp).

Is the ai.hanria/check MCP server safe to use?

ai.hanria/check scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ai.hanria/check MCP server expose?

ai.hanria/check exposes 2 tools: check_action, validate_mandate. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 412 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ai.hanria/check MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ai.hanria/check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ai.hanria/check MCP server still maintained?

ai.hanria/check is marked deprecated in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.