gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce
REMOTE · X402.GTINFETCH.AI · 2 COMPONENTS
gtinfetch — the GTIN resolver for AI agents. Any barcode, one call. 84M GTINs. x402 at the door.
Available components
Last scanned (1 hour ago)
Scores higher than 81% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security77
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 298 tokens (~298/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
- Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=gtinfetch.ai | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 12 Oct 2026 | 10 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 58062c05096a973575d55f602171ab9be14 |
| SANs: *.gtinfetch.ai, gtinfetch.ai | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of x402.gtinfetch.ai. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 1814, 3799 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| gtinfetch.ai. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| x402.gtinfetch.ai. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
fetch_gtin Fetch GTIN ~188
What is this GTIN? Returns the signed record for a GTIN-8/12/13/14: product, brand, maker, category and pack where a source page states them, each with the pages it was read from and the date it was read; seen_in markets and banners; confidence confirmed (two or more independent domains agree) or seen (one). A GTIN with no observation answers status unknown with no fields — never a guess. Pass market (hub market code; UK accepted for GB) to tag the ask with the market: a miss is queued as a lead for that market. Can it be sold there is the hub's gate, not this door's.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gtin | string | yes | 8, 12, 13 or 14 digits |
| market | string | – | optional hub market code, e.g. UK, US, FR |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | – | – |
| confidence | string | – | – |
| fields | object | – | – |
| gtin14 | string | yes | – |
| signature | object | – | – |
| sources | array | – | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server?
gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce is a hosted endpoint at https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · x402.gtinfetch.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-gtinfetch-gtinfetch 'https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp'
What is the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server?
gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.gtinfetch/gtinfetch. gtinfetch, the GTIN resolver for AI agents. Any barcode, one call. 84M GTINs. x402 at the door. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://x402.gtinfetch.ai/mcp).
Is the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server safe to use?
gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server expose?
gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce exposes 1 tool: fetch_gtin. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 188 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce MCP server still maintained?
gtinfetch – Agentic Commerce is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.