Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Gateco

PYPI · GATECO

Permission-aware retrieval for AI systems: policy-enforced access to organizational knowledge.

Available components

0 this week 24 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 7% of PyPI servers

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security50
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 0 of 12 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Build provenance is cryptographically sound, but it attests a different repository to the one declared in the registry. Most often the declared URL is simply stale. View diagnostics → Unverified
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 19 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 18 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 15 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 14 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 13 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 12 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to compare. security
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool text to scan. security
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to assess. functional
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
  • 4 Oct 26 0
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. security
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Package version: 1.12.1 → 1.13.0 functional
  • 2 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/gateco@1.13.0

Provenance Repository mismatch

The attestation is cryptographically sound but binds a different repository to the one the registry declares. Most often the declared URL is simply stale.

Result Repository mismatch
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Repository mismatch
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo fortisil/gateco
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/fortisil/gateco/.github/workflows/publish-sdk-python.yml@refs/tags/sdk-python-v1.13.0
Rekor log index 3076421511
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:5fb5e7d581563642528c1a22a8ab939788e80592d655a78709d69ed448b9f26e

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 12 packages
Packages resolved 12
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.

Install

How do I install the Gateco MCP server?

Gateco runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx gateco. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · gateco

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add ai-gateco-gateco -- uvx gateco
Common questions

What is the Gateco MCP server?

Gateco is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.gateco/gateco. Permission-aware retrieval for AI systems: policy-enforced access to organizational knowledge. This page covers its PyPI package (gateco).

Is the Gateco MCP server safe to use?

Gateco scores 24 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 24 October 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the Gateco MCP server still maintained?

Gateco is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Gateco MCP server under?

Gateco declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.