EcoCheck
REMOTE · ECOCHECK.AI
Vietnam GHG inventory obligation checker, 2026 regulations, CBAM and ESG articles (read-only).
Available components
Last scanned (13 hours ago)
Scores higher than 94% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.
Category Health and Science
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1879 tokens (~134/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage92
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 77% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 15 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ecocheck.ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=ecocheck.ai | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 5 Oct 2026 | 3 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 61cfa08a9bc8ab6c663d543c5c7d1cbb556 |
| SANs: *.ecocheck.ai, ecocheck.ai | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of ecocheck.ai. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | DS published | 1814, 3799 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ecocheck.ai. | DS published | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| ecocheck.ai. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://challenges.cloudflare.com https://js.hcaptcha.com https://*.hcaptcha.com https://assets.calendly.com https://www.clarity.ms https://scripts.clarity.ms; frame-ancestors 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://ecocheck.ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://ecocheck.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://ecocheck.ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
about_ecocheck About EcoCheck ~34
What EcoCheck is (company, product, services) with links to its pricing page, case studies and contact page.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
calculate_ghg_inventory Calculate a GHG inventory (ISO 14064-1) ~270
GHG inventory from activity data, reported by ISO 14064-1 category (1-6), GHG Protocol scope and gas: fuels (IPCC 2006 tier-1 defaults; litres, kg, t, GJ, MWh…; stationary or mobile), purchased electricity (official Viet Nam grid factor of the year built in — 2024 = 0.6187 tCO2/MWh, CV 1232/BNNMT-BĐKH — or give your own), refrigerant / SF6 recharges (GWP AR5 or AR6), and custom lines with your own factor (Scope 3 via scope3_category). Biogenic CO2 reported separately; optional uncertainty.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| gwp | string | – | GWP set (AR5 for Vietnam Decree 06 and EU CBAM; default AR5). |
| lines | array | yes | Activity data lines. |
| number_format | string | – | Only for quantities sent as strings: vi = "1.050,5" style (dot thousands), en = "1,050.5" style. Ambiguous strings without it are refused. |
| organization | string | – | – |
| period | string | – | Reporting period, e.g. 2026 or 2026-Q1. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
cbam_default_value EU CBAM default value ~184
EU CBAM default value (tCO2e per tonne) of a CN8 code for a country of production, from Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2621 as corrected by 2026/1740, with the mark-up of the import year (10 % 2026, 20 % 2027, 30 % from 2028; fertilisers 1 %). When the exact code has no row, returns candidate codes with full descriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cn_code | string | yes | Exact 8-digit CN code, e.g. "72083900". |
| country | string | – | ISO-2 country of production (default VN; unknown -> Annex IV highest values). |
| variant | string | – | Clinker / hydraulic cement only. |
| year | integer | – | Year of import (mark-up), default 2026. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
cbam_scope_check Check EU CBAM scope of a CN code ~115
EU CBAM: is a product (CN code) in scope, which aggregated goods category, are indirect emissions counted, and its EU default value for the country of production. Use the 8-digit CN code of the customs declaration (4/6 digits give a partial answer).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cn_code | string | yes | CN code, e.g. "72083900" or "7208 39 00" (4-8 digits). |
| country | string | – | ISO-2 country of production, default VN. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_ghg_inventory_obligation Check GHG inventory obligation (Vietnam) ~271
Check whether a Vietnamese facility must do a mandatory greenhouse-gas (GHG) inventory under Decree 06/2022 (amended by 119/2025) and the 2026 list (Decision 42/2026/QĐ-TTg). Thresholds: 3,000 tCO2e, 1,000 TOE or 65,000 t of waste per year.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| annualElectricityKwh | number | – | Annual electricity use in kWh (used if TOE is unknown; converted at 0.0001543 TOE/kWh per Appendix I of Circular 02/2014/TT-BCT, so 1,000 TOE ≈ 6.48 million kWh). |
| annualEmissionsTco2e | number | – | Annual GHG emissions in tonnes CO2e. |
| annualEnergyToe | number | – | Annual energy use in TOE (tonnes of oil equivalent). |
| annualWasteTonnes | number | – | Solid-waste treatment capacity, tonnes/year (waste facilities). |
| sector | string | yes | cong-nghiep (industry), nhiet-dien (power), van-tai (freight transport), toa-nha (commercial building), chat-thai (solid waste), khac (other). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
estimate_cbam_cost Estimate EU CBAM certificate cost ~255
Indicative CBAM certificate cost for the EU importer: embedded emissions (default value with mark-up, or the producer's actual SEE) minus the free-allocation adjustment (Reg 2025/2620 benchmark × CBAM factor 97.5 % in 2026 × CSCF), times the official certificate price (latest quarterly price unless given). Shows the saving with actual data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actual_see | number | – | Producer's actual specific embedded emissions, tCO2e/t (verified), instead of the default value. |
| carbon_price_paid_eur_per_t | number | – | Carbon price effectively paid in the country of origin, EUR per tCO2e embedded (none for Viet Nam in 2026). |
| certificate_price_eur | number | – | CBAM certificate price EUR/tCO2e (default: latest official quarterly price). |
| cn_code | string | yes | Exact 8-digit CN code. |
| country | string | – | ISO-2 country of production, default VN. |
| tonnes | number | yes | Net mass imported into the EU, tonnes. |
| variant | string | – | Clinker / hydraulic cement only. |
| year | integer | – | Year of import, default 2026. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_article Read an EcoCheck article ~41
Get one EcoCheck article as Markdown by numeric id or slug (from list_articles / search_ecocheck).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Article id or slug. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_ghg_regulations Vietnam GHG, carbon market and CBAM rules (2026) ~100
Key verified facts for Vietnam GHG compliance in 2026: Decision 42/2026 facility list (2,441 facilities), reporting deadline 31/3/2027, pilot ETS allowances (Decision 263) and surrender rules (borrowing ≤15%, offsets ≤30%), domestic carbon exchange (Decree 29/2026), EU CBAM 2027 dates. Each item links to an EcoCheck explainer.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_pricing EcoCheck plans and prices ~52
EcoCheck software plans (Basic free, Pro 4,950,000 VND/month, Pro+ 10,950,000 VND/month, Advanced custom) and where to find inventory-service cost ranges.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ghg_emission_factors Default emission factors (IPCC 2006, GWP, Viet Nam grid) ~110
Built-in default factors used by calculate_ghg_inventory: fuels (NCV, CO2/CH4/N2O, density), refrigerant GWPs (AR5 / AR6), GWP sets, official Viet Nam grid emission factors by year (2024 = 0.6187 tCO2/MWh, CV 1232/BNNMT-BĐKH 30/09/2026). Cite them in the report.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
iso14064_guide ISO 14064-1 guide ~102
Practical guidance for an ISO 14064-1 organization inventory (paraphrased, not the standard text): categories and boundaries with the Scope 1/2/3 cross-walk, significance of indirect emissions, quantification, base year and recalculation, uncertainty, report content and review checklist, ISO 14064-3 verification evidence, Vietnam Decree 06 / Decision 42/2026 obligations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| topic | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_articles List EcoCheck articles ~38
List EcoCheck articles (Vietnamese), newest first, optionally filtered by keyword.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_services List EcoCheck services ~36
List EcoCheck services: GHG inventory service, inventory software platform, CBAM reporting, ESG reporting, free obligation lookup tool, Academy.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_ecocheck Search EcoCheck content ~60
Search EcoCheck services, regulations and Vietnamese articles on GHG inventory, Scope 1/2/3, CBAM, carbon credits and ESG. Returns ranked matches with URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the EcoCheck MCP server?
EcoCheck is a hosted endpoint at https://ecocheck.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · ecocheck.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-ecocheck-ecocheck 'https://ecocheck.ai/mcp'
What is the EcoCheck MCP server?
EcoCheck is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.ecocheck/ecocheck. Vietnam GHG inventory obligation checker, 2026 regulations, CBAM and ESG articles (read-only). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ecocheck.ai/mcp).
Is the EcoCheck MCP server safe to use?
EcoCheck scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the EcoCheck MCP server expose?
EcoCheck exposes 14 tools: check_ghg_inventory_obligation, get_ghg_regulations, cbam_scope_check, cbam_default_value, estimate_cbam_cost, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,668 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the EcoCheck MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to EcoCheck without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the EcoCheck MCP server still maintained?
EcoCheck is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the EcoCheck MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on EcoCheck, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.