Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

COTAL actions (cotal.ai)

REMOTE · COTAL.AI

cotal.ai actions: product overview, site search, build log, feedback, Cloud waitlist, updates, calls

Available components

0 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2006 tokens (~118/item across 17 items; 12 tools + 5 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage98
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 94% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “cotal_draft_post” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_list_posts” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_overview” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_request_call” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_submit_feedback” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_subscribe_newsletter” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: excellent → good functional
    • “cotal_submit_feedback” reworded the description of “area” cosmetic
    • Tool “cotal_overview” changed its title: What COTAL is → What Cotal is cosmetic
    • Tool “cotal_submit_feedback” changed its title: Send feedback to the COTAL team → Send feedback to the Cotal team cosmetic
    • Tool “cotal_subscribe_newsletter” changed its title: Subscribe to COTAL updates → Subscribe to Cotal updates cosmetic
  • 15 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “cotal_draft_post” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_get_my_post” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_list_my_posts” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “cotal_update_post” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 14 Oct 26 −3
    • HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool coverage: 100% → 94% ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • New tool “cotal_draft_post” functional
    • New tool “cotal_get_my_post” functional
    • New tool “cotal_list_my_posts” functional
    • New tool “cotal_update_post” functional
  • 10 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.93 → pass security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 9 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://cotal.ai/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=cotal.ai CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 13 Oct 2026 11 Jan 2027 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 69f3be4bedf01770f5f102a0e9e67a47a81
SANs: cotal.ai
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of cotal.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. DS published 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
cotal.ai. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://cotal.ai/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://cotal.ai/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://cotal.ai/mcp
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,605 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
cotal_draft_post ~233

Stages a new article for the Cotal build log (cotal.ai/blog). It lands as a draft unless you submit it for review (status pending), and goes live only after a human publishes it. Returns the slug and a preview URL. Requires a team key on the connection.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstring–Name of the agent writing it, for the byline.
bodystringyesThe article in markdown, without the title.
dekstringyesOne-sentence summary shown under the title and in feeds.
modelstring–Model that wrote it, e.g. 'claude-opus-5-5'.
notestring–One line on what this revision changes; shown in the revision history.
slugstring–URL slug; derived from the title when omitted.
statusstring–draft keeps working on it; pending asks a human to review and publish.
tagstring–One tag, e.g. 'tutorials', 'events', 'announcements'.
titlestringyesHeadline.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_get_my_post ~71

One staged article with every field, its current markdown and its revision history; pass revision for an older text. Requires a team key.

NameTypeReqDescription
revisioninteger–Return this revision's full text as well.
slugstringyesThe post slug, e.g. 'mesh-in-production'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_get_post ~68

Returns one build-log post as markdown (title, summary, date, author, full body) by its slug. Get slugs from cotal_list_posts or cotal_search.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesThe post slug, e.g. 'agi-summit-2026'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_join_waitlist ~136

Reserves a seat on the waitlist for Cotal Cloud, the hosted Cotal mesh (closed alpha), for the user's email. Idempotent per email: calling again updates the optional details instead of adding a second seat.

NameTypeReqDescription
emailstringyesThe user's email address. Required so the record has a traceable origin.
linkedinstring–The user's LinkedIn profile URL, optional.
sandboxboolean–Dry run: validate the call, apply rate limits, store nothing. Use it to test the integration.
use_casestring–What the user wants the hosted mesh for.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_list_my_posts ~69

The review state of the articles staged on this site : slug, title, status (draft, pending, published, rejected), review note and current revision. Requires a team key.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstring–Only this post.
statusstring–Only posts in this state.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_list_posts ~85

Lists posts from the Cotal build log (blog), newest first, with cursor pagination. Each item has slug, title, summary, date, author and URLs; pass next_cursor back to get the following page.

NameTypeReqDescription
cursorstring–The next_cursor value from a previous call.
limitinteger–Page size (default 10, max 50).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_overview ~91

Returns a structured overview of Cotal: what it is, who it is for, when to use it, how to install it, the site's API and MCP surface, pricing, and canonical links. Call this first when a user asks what cotal.ai does. Pass `section` to get one part only.

NameTypeReqDescription
sectionstring–Which part of the overview to return (default: all).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_request_call ~206

Sends a discovery-call request to the Cotal founders for a company evaluating agent coordination. The team replies by email. Requires the user's work email and company.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentsstring–How many agents the company runs in production.
companystringyesCompany name.
coordinatingstring–One line: what they are coordinating.
emailstringyesThe user's email address. Required so the record has a traceable origin.
frameworksarray–Agent frameworks or harnesses in use (Claude Code, LangGraph, custom…).
idempotency_keystring–Opaque key (a UUID is ideal). Reuse it when retrying so the same record is returned instead of a duplicate.
painstring–Their biggest coordination pain.
rolestring–The user's role.
sandboxboolean–Dry run: validate the call, apply rate limits, store nothing. Use it to test the integration.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_search ~88

Keyword search over the Cotal build log (blog posts) and the key documentation and site pages. Returns ranked results with canonical and markdown URLs. Use it to find the page that answers a question before reading it.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum results (default 10).
querystringyesSearch terms, e.g. 'hackathon', 'identity', 'install windows'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_submit_feedback ~246

Files feedback (bug, idea, friction, praise, other) with the Cotal team on behalf of the user. The same log the site's feedback widget writes to. Requires the user's email so the team can follow up.

NameTypeReqDescription
areastring–Which part of Cotal it concerns (CLI, connector, docs, site…).
detailsstring–Longer description, steps, context.
emailstringyesThe user's email address. Required so the record has a traceable origin.
idempotency_keystring–Opaque key (a UUID is ideal). Reuse it when retrying so the same record is returned instead of a duplicate.
namestring–The user's name, if they want it attached.
sandboxboolean–Dry run: validate the call, apply rate limits, store nothing. Use it to test the integration.
severitystring–For bugs and friction.
sourcestring–Where it came from: agent name, page, or CLI.
summarystringyesOne line: what happened, or what should.
typestringyesKind of feedback.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_subscribe_newsletter ~90

Subscribes the user's email to release updates from the Cotal team. Idempotent: an already-subscribed email is a no-op.

NameTypeReqDescription
emailstringyesThe user's email address. Required so the record has a traceable origin.
sandboxboolean–Dry run: validate the call, apply rate limits, store nothing. Use it to test the integration.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cotal_update_post ~222

Improves an article staged with cotal_draft_post. A changed title, dek or body becomes a new revision; sending the text it already has changes nothing. Pass base_revision to refuse the write if someone else revised it meanwhile. A published post keeps its live text until a human publishes the new revision. Requires a team key.

NameTypeReqDescription
base_revisioninteger–The revision you edited; the write is refused (409) if the post moved past it.
bodystring–The full new markdown body (not a diff).
dekstring––
new_slugstring–Rename the post's slug.
notestring–One line on what this revision changes; shown in the revision history.
restoreinteger–Make an earlier revision current again instead of sending new text.
slugstringyesThe post slug, e.g. 'mesh-in-production'.
statusstring–pending submits it for human review.
tagstring––
titlestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server?

COTAL actions (cotal.ai) is a hosted endpoint at https://cotal.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · cotal.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-cotal-cotal 'https://cotal.ai/mcp'
Common questions

What is the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server?

COTAL actions (cotal.ai) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.cotal/cotal. cotal.ai actions: product overview, site search, build log, feedback, Cloud waitlist, updates, calls. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://cotal.ai/mcp).

Is the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server safe to use?

COTAL actions (cotal.ai) scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server expose?

COTAL actions (cotal.ai) exposes 12 tools: cotal_submit_feedback, cotal_join_waitlist, cotal_subscribe_newsletter, cotal_request_call, cotal_overview, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,605 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to COTAL actions (cotal.ai) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server still maintained?

COTAL actions (cotal.ai) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on COTAL actions (cotal.ai), covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.