Askline
REMOTE · ASKLINE.AI
Askline shows what ChatGPT says about a brand, then the SEO that feeds it.
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 26% of remote servers
Unreachable for 1 day in a row. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security11
- TLS not yet verified: we couldn't open a connection to check the certificate. View diagnostics → Unverified
- Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS not yet verified: we couldn't read the response headers to check for it. View diagnostics → Unverified
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but we couldn't connect to verify it. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: behind authorisation → unreachable ▼ security
- Transport: unverified → fail ▼ security
- HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: pass → unverified ▼ security
- TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities. functional
- Schema quality: Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list. functional
- 4 Oct 26 +14
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → behind authorisation ▼ security
- Transport: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools. security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools. functional
- Schema quality: Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Sept 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: behind authorisation → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Transport: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Authorization: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities. functional
- Schema quality: Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list. functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Aug 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → behind authorisation ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.03 → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: fail → pass ▲ security
- First check of Authorization: pass security
- Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 29 Aug 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 28 Aug 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://askline.ai/mcp
TLS unreached
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of askline.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 1814, 3799 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| askline.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Inconclusive
We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.
| Result | Inconclusive |
|---|
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://askline.ai/mcp | Unreachable | ||
| http (plaintext) | http://askline.ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ai_mentions ~70
How often Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT mention a brand or domain (10 lookups). Costs 10 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| platform | string | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ai_search_volume ~67
How often people ask ChatGPT-class tools about these keywords. Uses the saved Project market when location is omitted (1 lookup). Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keywords | array | yes | Up to 20 keywords |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ai_share_of_voice ~65
Share of AI recommendations versus named competitors (10 lookups). Costs 10 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitors | array | – | – |
| keyword | string | – | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
backlink_overview ~39
Backlink count, referring domains, rank, and spam score (2 lookups). Costs 2 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
chatgpt_answer ~100
Live ChatGPT or Gemini answer for a prompt: the text, recommended brands, and cited URLs. Uses the saved Project market when location is omitted. Takes up to 2 minutes (1 lookup). Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | Prompt or question, e.g. best project management software |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| platform | string | – | Default chat_gpt |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
competitor_keywords ~67
Keywords competitors rank for that the target does not, plus overlap. Uses the saved Project when target or location is omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitor | string | – | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
domain_overview ~63
Organic traffic, ranking keywords, and domain rank for a host. Uses the saved Project domain and market when those args are omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_project ~35
Return the saved Project (primary domain and market) for this MCP user. Free — not a lookup. Costs 0 lookups.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gsc_pages ~34
Search Console pages for the connected property. 0 credits. Costs 0 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gsc_performance ~32
Google Search Console totals: clicks, impressions, average position. 0 credits. Costs 0 lookups.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
gsc_queries ~34
Search Console queries for the connected property. 0 credits. Costs 0 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
keyword_difficulty ~69
Score how hard it is to rank in the top 10 for one or more keywords (0–100). Uses the saved Project market when location is omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keywords | array | yes | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
keyword_research Keyword research ~69
Find related keywords with monthly search volume and keyword difficulty for a seed term. Uses the saved Project market when location is omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| limit | number | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language_code | string | yes | – |
| location_code | number | yes | – |
| location_label | string | yes | – |
| project_domain | string|null | – | – |
| remaining_lookups | number|null | yes | – |
| rows | array | yes | – |
| seed | string | yes | – |
| source | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
link_gap ~44
Referring domains that link to competitors but not the target (2 lookups). Costs 2 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitors | array | yes | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
llm_citations ~115
Pages and domains ChatGPT and AI Overviews quote for a topic or competitor. Pass a domain, a keyword, or both. ChatGPT mention data is US/English only (10 lookups). Costs 10 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | Topic AI is answering, e.g. seo tools |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| platform | string | – | Default both platforms |
| target | string | – | Your domain, e.g. ahrefs.com |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
pin_finding ~43
Pin a finding to the account and SEO Board. 0 credits. Costs 0 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | string | yes | – |
| title | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ranked_keywords ~66
Keywords a domain already ranks for, with position and volume. Uses the saved Project when target or location is omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language_code | string | – | – |
| limit | number | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
referring_domains ~41
Domains linking to the target, with rank (2 lookups). Costs 2 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | – |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
research_memory ~50
Read or write project notes so research compounds across chats. 0 credits. Costs 0 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| key | string | – | – |
| value | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
serp_overview ~63
Live Google organic SERP: ranking URLs, titles, and SERP features. Uses the saved Project market when location is omitted. Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
set_project ~91
Save this user's Project: primary domain and market (country + language, e.g. in-en or India English). Later keyword, SERP, and competitor tools use it when domain or locale are omitted. Free — not a lookup. Costs 0 lookups.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | – |
| language_code | string | – | – |
| location_code | number | – | – |
| market | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
site_audit ~63
On-page audit of one URL via instant pages. Stores the last run so a re-audit reports what changed (1 lookup). Costs 1 lookup.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_pages | number | – | Ignored. Instant pages audits one URL. |
| target | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Askline MCP server?
Askline is a hosted endpoint at https://askline.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · askline.ai
claude mcp add --transport http ai-askline-askline 'https://askline.ai/mcp'
What is the Askline MCP server?
Askline is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ai.askline/askline. Askline shows what ChatGPT says about a brand, then the SEO that feeds it. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://askline.ai/mcp).
Is the Askline MCP server safe to use?
Askline scores 37 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Askline MCP server expose?
Askline exposes 22 tools: keyword_research, keyword_difficulty, serp_overview, domain_overview, ranked_keywords, and 17 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,320 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Askline MCP server require authentication?
Its publisher declares no required credentials for Askline. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.
Is the Askline MCP server still maintained?
Askline is still listed in the MCP registry, though our most recent checks did not reach this channel. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.