ResultGate
PYPI · RESULTGATE-PILOT
Local service recommendations for six providers, disclosed referrals and evidence checks.
Available components
Last scanned (21 hours ago)
Scores higher than 57% of PyPI servers
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 33 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to AHEDMUNI/resultgate). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 9 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability56
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 278 tokens (~46/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability check failed: the tool surface changed between 0.2.0 and 0.3.1: 12 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 6 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 3 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.1 functional
- 30 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 27 Oct 26 +25
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Schema quality: 58 → 46 ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Destructive annotations: 0 → pass functional
- 26 Oct 26 −25
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 58 → 46 ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- Destructive annotations: 0 → pass functional
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.1 functional
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.0 functional
- 22 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 21 Oct 26 60
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/resultgate-pilot@0.3.1
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | AHEDMUNI/resultgate |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/AHEDMUNI/resultgate/.github/workflows/publish-pypi.yml@refs/heads/main |
| Rekor log index | 3473860747 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:cd49ae7e1704e4041194f31000d4a140ba7c68e0c0e054bd1a8461ef7c55d95a |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 33 packages
| Packages resolved | 33 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
assess_browseract_fit ~45
Choose free/existing API/reject/consider Basic based on need, never commission; prepare bounded task and official handoff. No authorization to spend.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | – | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_referral_providers ~39
List six researched provider cards and unresolved eligibility, prices and payout terms. Not contracted sellers; no execution. Affiliate status and disclosure are explicit.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
prepare_referral_task ~41
Return provider-specific task, example, output fields and official connection steps. No execution, account creation, secrets, purchase or attribution.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | – | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
recommend_referral_service ~41
Match an explicit need to capability; reject unsafe scope, prefer existing/local/free. Budget is not authorization. No commission-based ranking.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | – | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_browseract_csv ~43
Validate a max-20-row BrowserAct CSV against expected URLs. Preserve original strings; no currency inference, provider calls, payment or telemetry.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| payload | – | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_browseract_report ~38
Check completeness of up to 20 product results and supplied samples. No fetching or truth certification; errors stay explicit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| report | – | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ResultGate MCP server?
ResultGate runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx resultgate-pilot. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · resultgate-pilot
claude mcp add ahedmuni-resultgate -- uvx resultgate-pilot
What is the ResultGate MCP server?
ResultGate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.AHEDMUNI/resultgate. Local service recommendations for six providers, disclosed referrals and evidence checks. This page covers its PyPI package (resultgate-pilot).
Is the ResultGate MCP server safe to use?
ResultGate scores 60 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ResultGate MCP server expose?
ResultGate exposes 6 tools: assess_browseract_fit, validate_browseract_report, validate_browseract_csv, list_referral_providers, recommend_referral_service, prepare_referral_task. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 247 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the ResultGate MCP server still maintained?
ResultGate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the ResultGate MCP server under?
ResultGate declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.