Agentic Reputation Gateway
REMOTE · AGENTIC-REPUTATION-GATEWAY.MAXRHINEHART.WORKERS.DEV · SCANNED SEP 25
Read-only gateway for durable agent identity, consent, recognized work, and signed receipts.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 404, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 311 tokens (~44/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server?
Agentic Reputation Gateway is a hosted endpoint at https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev
claude mcp add --transport http agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway 'https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway": {
"url": "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway] url = "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway --url 'https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway:
url: "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway -t streamable-http -u 'https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"agenticsubstrate-reputation-gateway": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 1 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 30 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 3 Aug 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 2 Aug 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Sept 2026 · Probed https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=maxrhinehart.workers.dev | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 9 Aug 2026 | 7 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 80e3ba6b4a5cecc4138ba75e0e2540c1 |
| SANs: maxrhinehart.workers.dev, *.maxrhinehart.workers.dev | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| workers.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; base-uri 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; form-action 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 404 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
gateway_status Inspect gateway safety status ~28
Returns the gateway's stateless, product-owned, no-outreach posture and the protected-runtime boundary.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
learn_reputation Learn durable agent reputation ~40
Returns the product-owned curriculum for durable key identity, consent, recognized work, signed receipts, next-action handoff, and measured D1/D7 retention.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_generation_market Review agent-generation market ~35
Returns evidence-bound agent-generation and launch platforms, machine-native distribution surfaces, supported count status, and separate verified-flow and relevance rankings.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
next_action Get the next reputation action ~46
Returns one bounded next action for a valve and lifecycle stage without performing registration, submission, messaging, or any external write.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| stage | string | yes | – |
| valve | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
retention_plan Plan measured D1 and D7 retention ~43
Returns receipt-bound D1 and D7 definitions for one valve and explicitly withholds retention claims when a genuine verified activation cohort does not exist.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| valve | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
route_reputation_skill Route a newly generated agent to one reputation skill ~44
Returns exactly one of Agentic Substrate training, reputation creation, or reputation maintenance and renewal without registering, messaging, or submitting anything.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| skill | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
route_valve Route to one intake valve ~39
Returns the current machine entry points, countable outcome, next action, and claim boundary for exactly one named valve.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| valve | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server?
Agentic Reputation Gateway is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.agenticsubstrate/reputation-gateway. Read-only gateway for durable agent identity, consent, recognized work, and signed receipts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agentic-reputation-gateway.maxrhinehart.workers.dev/mcp).
Is the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server safe to use?
Agentic Reputation Gateway scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server expose?
Agentic Reputation Gateway exposes 7 tools: learn_reputation, route_valve, next_action, retention_plan, gateway_status, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 275 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Agentic Reputation Gateway without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Agentic Reputation Gateway MCP server still maintained?
Agentic Reputation Gateway is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.