Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Simmer

NPM · SIMMER-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20

Trade prediction markets with AI agents — skill discovery, autoresearch, and execution.

Available components

0 this week 82 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 31 of 95 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 156 tokens (~52/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
  • Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the Simmer MCP server?

Simmer runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y simmer-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · simmer-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add adlai88-simmer-mcp -- npx -y simmer-mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adlai88-simmer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "simmer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "adlai88-simmer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "simmer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add adlai88-simmer-mcp -- npx -y simmer-mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "adlai88-simmer-mcp": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "simmer-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add adlai88-simmer-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg simmer-mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  adlai88-simmer-mcp:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "simmer-mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "adlai88-simmer-mcp": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "simmer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add adlai88-simmer-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y simmer-mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adlai88-simmer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "simmer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Sept 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified functional
  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 −3
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/simmer-mcp@3.3.2

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 95 packages
Packages resolved 95
Stale 31
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~156 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_skill_docs ~54

Get the full SKILL.md documentation for a specific Simmer skill. Includes description, parameters, usage examples, and troubleshooting tips.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesSkill slug (e.g. 'polymarket-fast-loop')

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_skills ~38

List all Simmer trading skills available in this package. Returns slug, name, version, tier, and whether the skill requires a Pro plan.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

troubleshoot_error ~64

Look up a Simmer API error and get a fix. Pass the error message or JSON response from a failed API call. Returns a matched fix or falls back to docs.

NameTypeReqDescription
error_textstringyesThe error message or response body from a failed Simmer API call

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Simmer MCP server?

Simmer is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.adlai88/simmer-mcp. Trade prediction markets with AI agents, skill discovery, autoresearch, and execution. This page covers its npm package (simmer-mcp).

Is the Simmer MCP server safe to use?

Simmer scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Simmer MCP server expose?

Simmer exposes 3 tools: list_skills, get_skill_docs, troubleshoot_error. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 156 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Simmer MCP server still maintained?

Simmer is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Simmer MCP server under?

Simmer declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.