io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos
PYPI · CONTRIBOS
Help open-source contributors earn maintainer trust: repo rules, briefs, and pre-submit checks.
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of PyPI servers
Category Version Control
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 744 tokens (~82/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
- Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage90
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 69% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Oct 26 +36
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.37 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 13 Oct 26 0
- Package version: 0.2.2 → 0.2.3 functional
- 12 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 8 Oct 26 −43
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- License: fail → pass ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- Package version: 0.2.1 → 0.2.2 functional
- 3 Oct 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/contribos@0.2.3
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
contribos_brief ~86
Evidence-backed contribution brief for an issue: files to read with reasons, similar past PRs, related tests, look-alike files to avoid, house rules and likely review questions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| issue_url | string | – | GitHub issue URL (needs API access) |
| repo | string | – | owner/name, when giving title instead of issue_url |
| title | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_check ~198
Pre-submit review of the local branch against the repo's rules and history: scope versus similar past changes, tests, changelog, sign-off, debug leftovers, AI policy, and whether the contributor's own explanation covers the change, AI-disclosure trailers, competing PRs, and (with verify_test) whether the test fails without the fix. Do not write the explanation for the user.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ai_note | string | – | how AI was used, e.g. 'Claude Code: drafted the test' |
| base | string | – | branch the work started from (default: auto-detect) |
| explain_file | string | – | or a file holding it |
| explanation | string | – | the contributor's own explanation, as text |
| issue | integer | – | issue number, to look for competing PRs |
| path | string | – | local checkout |
| verify_test | string | – | test command to run with and without the fix |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_claim ~85
Draft the short proposal a contributor posts on an issue before coding (and a vouch introduction where the repo needs one). The human rewrites and posts it; never post it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| issue_url | string | – | GitHub issue URL (needs API access) |
| repo | string | – | owner/name, when giving title instead of issue_url |
| title | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_diagnose ~68
Explain a failed install or test run: missing dependency, wrong version, service not running, missing env var, flaky test, or a real test failure.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| log | string | – | the failing command's output |
| output_file | string | – | or a file holding that output |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_find ~45
Find open issues where a newcomer is actually welcome, with takeability evidence.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | – | – |
| repos | array | – | – |
| topic | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_policy ~81
What a GitHub repository expects from outside contributors: AI policy, vouch/trust gates, claim-first norms, tests, changelog, sign-off, activity. Every finding cites file:line. Call this before starting work on any repo.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| json | boolean | – | return machine-readable rules instead of markdown |
| repo | string | yes | owner/name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_review ~94
Review coach for an open PR: classifies each reviewer comment, shows the code it points at, drafts replies, and lists comments still waiting on the author.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | object | – | or saved review data: author, review_comments, issue_comments, reviews |
| path | string | – | local checkout, to show the code each comment points at |
| pr_url | string | – | PR URL (needs API access) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_setup ~34
Exact steps to set up and test a repository, taken from its CI and contributing docs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
contribos_tone ~53
Check text the human is about to post for machine-written tells, length, and a clear question. Points at problems; the human rewrites.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| kind | string | – | – |
| text | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx contribos. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · contribos
claude mcp add adityatiwari101104-contribos -- uvx contribos
What is the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos. Help open-source contributors earn maintainer trust: repo rules, briefs, and pre-submit checks. This page covers its PyPI package (contribos).
Is the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server safe to use?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 16 October 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server expose?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos exposes 9 tools: contribos_policy, contribos_brief, contribos_setup, contribos_diagnose, contribos_check, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 744 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server still maintained?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos MCP server under?
io.github.adityatiwari101104/contribos declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.