Japanese Article Quick Check
REMOTE · JP-ARTICLE-CHECK-FREE.9GBNK9SZTM.WORKERS.DEV
Free Japanese article checker for claims, duplicate text, PR disclosure, and basic quality.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Testing and QA
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security46
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 63 tokens (~63/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.93 → pass security
- 10 Oct 26 +2
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 14 Sept 26 0
- Tool “quick_article_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 77 → 63 ▲ functional
- “quick_article_check” reworded the description of “text” cosmetic
- 13 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 20 Sept 2026 | 19 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 59edbad2f5b10c921399b618e2be8107 |
| SANs: 9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev, *.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| workers.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
quick_article_check ~63
Free rule-based checker for Japanese articles. Checks strong claims, duplicate text, PR disclosure, commercial links, URLs, long sentences, and basic article quality. No external AI API is used.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | 監査対象の日本語記事本文 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server?
Japanese Article Quick Check is a hosted endpoint at https://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev
claude mcp add --transport http 45b6sm69tr-ops-jp-article-check-free 'https://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp'
What is the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server?
Japanese Article Quick Check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.45b6sm69tr-ops/jp-article-check-free. Free Japanese article checker for claims, duplicate text, PR disclosure, and basic quality. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://jp-article-check-free.9gbnk9sztm.workers.dev/mcp).
Is the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server safe to use?
Japanese Article Quick Check scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server expose?
Japanese Article Quick Check exposes 1 tool: quick_article_check. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 63 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Japanese Article Quick Check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Japanese Article Quick Check MCP server still maintained?
Japanese Article Quick Check is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.