Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis

REMOTE · COSTABLE.AI

Parametric should-cost: P50/P80/P90 estimates, 801 materials, 25 countries, quote review.

Available components

0 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1461 tokens (~146/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 21 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 23 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 22 Aug 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://costable.ai/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=costable.ai CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 31 Oct 2026 29 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5116da566794340fec43e34672682624464
SANs: *.costable.ai, costable.ai
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of costable.ai. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 1814, 3799 8, 8 Verified
costable.ai. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://costable.ai/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://costable.ai/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://costable.ai:443/api/mcp
MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~1,391 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
add_material_to_model ~153

Add a material (BOM line) to an existing cost model. Searches the materials database by name query — no need for exact IDs.

NameTypeReqDescription
massKgnumberyesMass of material per unit in kilograms.
materialQuerystringyesMaterial name to search for, e.g. 'ABS', 'Aluminium 6061', 'Stainless 304'.
modelIdnumberyesCost model ID returned by create_cost_model.
qtynumber–Number of this material per unit assembly. Defaults to 1.
scrapFactornumber–Scrap/yield factor (e.g. 1.05 = 5% material waste). Defaults to 1.05.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

add_process_to_model ~220

Add a manufacturing process step to an existing cost model. Searches the process database by name query — no need for exact IDs.

NameTypeReqDescription
countryCodestringyesCountry where this process step is performed (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2).
cycleTimeHrsnumberyesCycle time per unit in decimal hours (e.g. 0.5 = 30 minutes).
modelIdnumberyesCost model ID returned by create_cost_model.
processQuerystringyesProcess name to search for, e.g. 'CNC 3-Axis', 'Injection Moulding', 'TIG Welding'.
skillLevelstringyesWorker skill level. Options: cnc_machinist, machine_operator, welder, composite_tech, assembly_tech, quality_inspector, toolmaker, engineer, general_labour, painter, electrician, plumber, driver, war…
stepOrdernumber–Step sequence number (1 = first). Defaults to 1.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

calculate_cost_model ~70

Run the Monte Carlo should-cost calculation on a cost model. Returns P50 (median), P80 and P90 cost-at-risk per unit, plus a full cost breakdown (material, labour, machine, overhead, margin).

NameTypeReqDescription
modelIdnumberyesCost model ID returned by create_cost_model.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_manufacturing_countries ~99

Run the cost model across multiple manufacturing countries simultaneously to identify the optimal sourcing location. Returns P50/P80/P90 per country and % delta vs baseline.

NameTypeReqDescription
countriesarrayyesArray of ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes to compare, e.g. ['US','CN','VN','MX','DE']. Maximum 6.
modelIdnumberyesCost model ID returned by create_cost_model.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

create_cost_model ~181

Create a new parametric cost model in Costable. Returns the model ID which is used by add_material_to_model, add_process_to_model, calculate_cost_model, and compare_manufacturing_countries.

NameTypeReqDescription
batchQtynumberyesBatch / order quantity. Affects Wright's Law learning curve.
countryCodestringyesPrimary manufacturing country code (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2).
marginRatenumber–Profit margin as a decimal fraction (e.g. 0.15 = 15%). Defaults to 0.15.
namestringyesDescriptive name for the cost model, e.g. 'Aluminium Enclosure Rev2'.
overheadRatenumber–Factory overhead as a decimal fraction (e.g. 0.25 = 25%). Defaults to 0.25.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

estimate_part ~217

Instantly estimate the should-cost of a manufactured part using natural language. Returns P50 (median), P80 and P90 cost-at-risk per unit based on Monte Carlo simulation of material price variance, labour rate variance and cycle time uncertainty. Use this for quick feasibility checks before building a full cost model.

NameTypeReqDescription
batchQtynumber–Batch / order quantity. Affects Wright's Law learning curve factor. Defaults to 100.
countryCodestring–ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 manufacturing country code. Defaults to 'US'. Supported: US, CN, DE, JP, UK, MX, IN, VN, TH, PL, BR, FR, IT, KR, TW, CA, SE, SG, MY, ID, CZ, TR, ZA, ES, AU.
descriptionstringyesNatural language description, e.g. '500 ABS injection moulded phone cases 0.08 kg' or 'CNC milled aluminium bracket 0.45 kg, 100 units'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_labour_rates ~79

Get manufacturing labour rates ($/hr) for all skill levels in a given country. Data covers 16 skill levels across 25 countries (ILO/BLS/ABS sourced).

NameTypeReqDescription
countryCodestringyesISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code, e.g. 'US', 'CN', 'DE', 'VN'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

review_supplier_quote ~109

Analyse a supplier quote against Costable's should-cost benchmarks. Returns a line-by-line delta (% over/under should-cost), verdict (LOW / COMPETITIVE / HIGH / VERY HIGH), and a list of the top items to challenge in negotiation.

NameTypeReqDescription
countryCodestringyesSupplier's manufacturing country (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2).
itemsarrayyesQuote line items.
supplierNamestringyesName of the supplier (for labelling the report).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_materials ~139

Search the Costable materials database (37 materials with LME-sourced pricing). Returns material name, category, price per kg, density, and strength properties.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Filter by category: Metals - Aluminium, Metals - Steel, Metals - Titanium, Metals - Copper Alloys, Polymers - Thermoplastic, Polymers - Thermoset, Composites, Timber, Rubber & Elastomers.
limitnumber–Maximum results to return. Defaults to 20.
querystring–Search query, e.g. 'aluminium', 'stainless', 'ABS', 'titanium'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_processes ~124

Search the Costable manufacturing process database (41 processes). Returns process name, category, machine rate ($/hr), and cycle time model.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Filter by category: CNC Machining, Sheet Metal, Casting, Polymer Processing, Additive Manufacturing, Composites, Welding & Joining, Surface Finishing, Assembly.
limitnumber–Maximum results to return. Defaults to 20.
querystring–Search query, e.g. 'CNC', 'injection moulding', 'laser cutting', 'anodising'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server?

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis is a hosted endpoint at https://costable.ai/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · costable.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http 1337mofo-costable 'https://costable.ai/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server?

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.1337mofo/costable. Parametric should-cost: P50/P80/P90 estimates, 801 materials, 25 countries, quote review. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://costable.ai/api/mcp).

Is the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server safe to use?

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server expose?

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis exposes 10 tools: estimate_part, search_materials, search_processes, get_labour_rates, create_cost_model, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,391 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis MCP server still maintained?

Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.