Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

xyz.tenzro/tenzro

REMOTE · MCP.TENZRO.XYZ

Tenzro Network MCP server: wallet, identity, payments, inference, staking, bridges, verification.

Available components

−66 this week 0 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 months ago)

Scores higher than 0% of remote servers

Unreachable for 7 days in a row. Last reached 8 Aug 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Dead

Every channel of this server has been unreachable for long enough to be marked dead. Its trust score is pinned to 0 and does not recover automatically: even once the server responds again it stays dead until it is manually reinstated.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security0
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety–

Not scored yet: our latest scan of this component recorded no findings here. It fills in the next time we score it.

Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 4 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (2)

  • DNSSEC
  • Transport

Checks we could not complete (9)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • TLS certificate in Endpoint SecurityTLS not yet verified: we couldn't open a connection to check the certificate.
  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it.
  • HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 404, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
  • HSTS header in Endpoint SecurityHSTS not yet verified: we couldn't read the response headers to check for it.
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
  • Tool Safety in Tool SafetyNot scored yet: our latest scan of this component recorded no findings here. It fills in the next time we score it.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Aug 26 −16

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 19 Aug 26 −17

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 18 Aug 26 −16

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 17 Aug 26 −17

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 16 Aug 26 −16

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 9 Aug 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Stability: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • HTTPS: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 8 Aug 26 +1
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Aug 2026 · Probed https://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp

TLS unreached
DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.tenzro.xyz. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
xyz. DS published 3599, 18130 8, 8 Verified
tenzro.xyz. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp Unreachable
http (plaintext) http://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp Inconclusive 404
MCP tools · 535 exposed · ~57,551 tokens partial

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
initiate_passkey_recovery ~99

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
account_addressstringyes–
new_credential_id_hexstringyes–
new_ml_dsa_public_key_hexstringyes–
new_passkey_public_key_hexstringyes–
ttl_secsinteger|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

introspect_token ~146

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
tokenstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

iroh_fetch_blob ~93

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
tenzro_uristringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

iroh_get_info ~49

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

iroh_publish_blob ~81

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
bytes_b64stringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

issue_database_connection ~201

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
bearer_didstring|null––
caller_didstringyes–
capabilitystring|null––
database_idstringyes–
envelopestring|null––
ttl_secsinteger|null––
writeboolean|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

ivms101_hash ~61

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
envelope–yes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

join_as_participant ~205

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
display_namestring|null––
originstring|null––
participant_typestring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_active_validators ~42

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_agent_jwks ~73

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_agent_templates ~133

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
creatorstring|null––
free_onlyboolean|null––
limitinteger|null––
offsetinteger|null––
tagstring|null––
template_typestring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_api_keys ~66

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_apps ~24

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_audio_catalog ~127

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_audio_models ~73

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_bridge_adapters ~29

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_bridge_sponsorship_pools ~56

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_canton_domains ~36

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_capabilities ~61

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_daml_contracts ~97

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
domain_idstringyes–
limitinteger|null––
template_filterstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_database_engines ~67

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_database_partitions ~28

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
database_idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_databases ~16

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_detection_catalog ~68

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_detection_models ~37

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_disputes_by_channel ~105

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
channel_idstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_escrows_by_payee ~105

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
payeestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_escrows_by_payer ~102

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
payerstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_fee_routes ~40

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_files ~100

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger|null––
purposestring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_forecast_catalog ~48

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_forecast_models ~37

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_functions ~37

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
owner_didstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_inference_challenges ~97

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
providerstring|null––
statusstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_leases ~26

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_machines ~38

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
owner_didstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_memory_records ~125

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_didstringyes–
kindstring|null––
limitinteger|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_model_endpoints ~28

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_model_hashes ~51

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_models ~126

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring|null––
namestring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_my_api_keys ~124

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_nft_collections ~100

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
creatorstring|null––
limitinteger|null––
standardstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_passkeys ~42

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
account_addressstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_payment_protocols ~44

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_pending_approvals ~151

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
approver_didstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_pending_recoveries ~39

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
account_addressstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_privacy_domains_for_did ~47

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
didstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_proposals ~100

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger|null––
offsetinteger|null––
statusstring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_provider_capacity ~104

No description provided.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

list_providers ~105

No description provided.

NameTypeReqDescription
provider_typestring|null––
NameTypeReqDescription
result–yes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server?

xyz.tenzro/tenzro is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.tenzro.xyz

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http xyz-tenzro-tenzro 'https://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp'
Common questions

What is the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server?

xyz.tenzro/tenzro is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as xyz.tenzro/tenzro. Tenzro Network MCP server: wallet, identity, payments, inference, staking, bridges, verification. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.tenzro.xyz/mcp).

Is the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server safe to use?

xyz.tenzro/tenzro scores 0 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Does the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for xyz.tenzro/tenzro. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server still maintained?

xyz.tenzro/tenzro has been unreachable for long enough that we treat it as dead, and its score is pinned to zero. We last reached this channel on 8 August 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the xyz.tenzro/tenzro MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 2 checks on xyz.tenzro/tenzro, covering DNSSEC and Transport. 9 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about xyz.tenzro/tenzro: TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 5 more. 4 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.