Autotask
OCI · GHCR.IO/WYRE-TECHNOLOGY/AUTOTASK-MCP:V2.32.10
MCP server for Kaseya Autotask PSA — companies, tickets, projects, time entries, and more.
Available components
Last scanned (5 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 73% of OCI servers
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL redirects; it must resolve directly. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 57 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 13091 tokens (~120/item across 109 items; 101 tools + 8 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 91% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety90
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 6 of 10 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "autotask_get_ticket_charge" implies "charge" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Partial
- An AI judge read all 103 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 −2
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 97 to 80.
- 10 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 4 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 2 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 −3
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp:v2.32.10
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
autotask_update_ticket_checklist_item ~105
Update a checklist item on a ticket — edit text, mark complete/incomplete, or change position.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| isCompleted | boolean | – | Mark the item complete (true) or incomplete (false) |
| itemId | number | yes | The checklist item ID to update |
| itemName | string | – | New text for the checklist item |
| position | number | – | New ordering position for the item |
| ticketId | number | yes | The parent ticket ID |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Autotask MCP server?
Autotask runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i -e AUTOTASK_USERNAME -e AUTOTASK_SECRET -e AUTOTASK_INTEGRATION_CODE -e AUTOTASK_API_URL -e MCP_TRANSPORT -e AUTH_MODE -e LOG_LEVEL ghcr.io/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp:v2.32.10. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp:v2.32.10
claude mcp add wyre-technology-autotask-mcp -- docker run --rm -i -e AUTOTASK_USERNAME -e AUTOTASK_SECRET -e AUTOTASK_INTEGRATION_CODE -e AUTOTASK_API_URL -e MCP_TRANSPORT -e AUTH_MODE -e LOG_LEVEL ghcr.io/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp:v2.32.10
This image reads AUTOTASK_USERNAME, AUTOTASK_SECRET, AUTOTASK_INTEGRATION_CODE, AUTOTASK_API_URL, MCP_TRANSPORT, AUTH_MODE and LOG_LEVEL. Set them in your client's env block for this server; docker run -e passes each one through to the container.
What is the Autotask MCP server?
Autotask is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.wyre-technology/autotask-mcp. MCP server for Kaseya Autotask PSA, companies, tickets, projects, time entries, and more. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/wyre-technology/autotask-mcp:v2.32.10).
Is the Autotask MCP server safe to use?
Autotask scores 49 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Autotask MCP server expose?
Autotask exposes 101 tools: autotask_test_connection, autotask_search_companies, autotask_create_company, autotask_update_company, autotask_get_company_site_configuration, and 96 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 12,437 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Autotask MCP server still maintained?
Autotask is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Autotask MCP server under?
Autotask declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.