Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp

PYPI · MCP-SERVER-MIKROTIK

MCP server for MikroTik routers: firewall, NAT, routing, DHCP, DNS, WireGuard and more via SSH.

−12 this week 71 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 68% of PyPI servers

Category Cloud Infrastructure

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security50
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 38 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to wiresage/mikrotik-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 9 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 15428 tokens (~72/item across 212 items; 212 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 24 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 213 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (15)

  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityMalware scan not yet available for this package.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1
    • Package version: 0.26.1.0 → 0.26.2.0 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 23 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 0.25.1.0 → 0.26.1.0 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/mcp-server-mikrotik@0.26.2.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo wiresage/mikrotik-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/wiresage/mikrotik-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/master
Rekor log index 3494336129
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:52ab730bf6ff17539f0ea46e29a20737f739a7f494dac53296e1be4420564173

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 38 packages
Packages resolved 38
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 212 exposed · ~15,351 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
update_nat_rule ~209

Updates an existing NAT rule on the MikroTik device. Notes: rule_id: use the ID from list output e.g. "*1" or "0" to_addresses: single IP or range e.g. "10.0.0.1" or "10.0.0.1-10.0.0.10" to_ports: single port or range e.g. "8080" or "8080-8090" Pass "" to clear an optional field.

NameTypeReqDescription
action–––
chain–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
dst_address–––
dst_port–––
in_interface–––
log–––
log_prefix–––
out_interface–––
protocol–––
rule_idstringyes–
src_address–––
src_port–––
to_addresses–––
to_ports–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_queue_tree ~164

Updates an existing queue tree entry (bandwidth limits, parent, priority, etc.). Notes: max_limit / limit_at / burst_limit / burst_threshold: bandwidth e.g. "10M", "512k" burst_time: duration e.g. "8s" priority: 1 (highest) – 8 (lowest)

NameTypeReqDescription
bucket_size–––
burst_limit–––
burst_threshold–––
burst_time–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
limit_at–––
max_limit–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
packet_mark–––
parent–––
priority–––
queue–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_queue_type ~121

Updates an existing queue type's discipline-specific settings.

NameTypeReqDescription
cake_ack_filter–––
cake_diffserv–––
cake_flowmode–––
cake_mpu–––
cake_nat–––
cake_overhead–––
cake_overhead_scheme–––
cake_rtt–––
cake_wash–––
device–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
pcq_classifier–––
pcq_limit–––
pcq_rate–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_route ~198

Updates a route. Notes: route_id: "*N" or "N" from list output e.g. "*3" dst_address: CIDR e.g. "192.168.1.0/24" check_gateway: "ping" or "arp" distance: 1-255 routing_table: name of a table from /routing table; "" moves the route back to "main", since every RouterOS 7 route belongs to a table. Pass "" to vrf_interface or pref_src to clear them.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_gateway–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
distance–––
dst_address–––
gateway–––
pref_src–––
route_idstringyes–
routing_table–––
scope–––
target_scope–––
vrf_interface–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_simple_queue ~219

Updates an existing simple queue's rate limits, target, or scheduling settings. Notes: target: IP/CIDR or interface e.g. "192.168.1.0/24" or "ether1" max_limit / limit_at / burst_limit / burst_threshold: upload/download bandwidth as "UL/DL" e.g. "10M/10M", or single value e.g. "10M" burst_time: duration e.g. "8s" priority: 1 (highest) – 8 (lowest)

NameTypeReqDescription
bucket_size–––
burst_limit–––
burst_threshold–––
burst_time–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
dst–––
limit_at–––
max_limit–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
packet_marks–––
parent–––
priority–––
queue–––
target–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_user ~55

Updates a user.

NameTypeReqDescription
address–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
group–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
password–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_user_group ~47

Updates a user group.

NameTypeReqDescription
comment–––
device–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
policy–––
skin–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_vlan_interface ~84

Updates an existing VLAN interface's settings on the MikroTik device.

NameTypeReqDescription
arp–––
arp_timeout–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
interface–––
mtu–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
use_service_tag–––
vlan_id–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_wireguard_interface ~69

Updates an existing WireGuard interface's settings on the MikroTik device.

NameTypeReqDescription
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
listen_port–––
mtu–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
private_key–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_wireguard_peer ~181

Updates an existing WireGuard peer's allowed addresses, endpoint, keepalive, or enabled state. Notes: peer_id: "*N" or "N" from list output e.g. "*2" allowed_address: CIDR, comma-separated e.g. "10.0.0.2/32" or "10.0.0.0/24,192.168.0.0/24" persistent_keepalive: seconds as string e.g. "25" Pass "" for endpoint_address or preshared_key to clear them.

NameTypeReqDescription
allowed_address–––
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
endpoint_address–––
endpoint_port–––
peer_idstringyes–
persistent_keepalive–––
preshared_key–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

update_wireless_interface ~62

Updates an existing wireless interface's settings (name, SSID, enabled state, etc.).

NameTypeReqDescription
comment–––
device–––
disabled–––
namestringyes–
new_name–––
ssid–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

upload_file ~47

Uploads a base64-encoded file to the MikroTik device (for restore operations).

NameTypeReqDescription
content_base64stringyes–
device–––
filenamestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx mcp-server-mikrotik. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · mcp-server-mikrotik

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add wiresage-mikrotik-mcp -- uvx mcp-server-mikrotik
Common questions

What is the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp. MCP server for MikroTik routers: firewall, NAT, routing, DHCP, DNS, WireGuard and more via SSH. This page covers its PyPI package (mcp-server-mikrotik).

Is the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server expose?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp exposes 212 tools: create_backup, list_backups, create_export, export_section, download_file, and 207 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 15,351 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server under?

io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp, covering Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health, Source repository and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp: Malware scan. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.