Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Kite Connect MCP

PYPI · KITE-CONNECT-MCP

Zerodha Kite Connect v3 for AI agents: orders (dry-run by default), GTT, alerts, portfolio, quotes

Available components

65 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 62% of PyPI servers

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security50
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 29 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to techfreakworm/kite-connect-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 10916 tokens (~205/item across 53 items; 53 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage96
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 89% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 3 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 54 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (15)

  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityMalware scan not yet available for this package.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.1.0 → 0.1.1 functional
  • 3 Nov 26 64

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/kite-connect-mcp@0.1.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo techfreakworm/kite-connect-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/techfreakworm/kite-connect-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3685174336
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:b076b5be269f87cd2e7f87f98766077fe15c2f36cba90827c696d3bc666c1f3d

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 29 packages
Packages resolved 29
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 53 exposed · ~10,725 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
ticker_stop ~64

Close the WebSocket connection and forget all subscriptions and cached ticks (order updates already received stay available). Calling ticker_subscribe later starts afresh, which is also how to retry after Kite refused the connection with the current token. Safe to call when nothing is running.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

ticker_subscribe ~329

Start streaming live market data for instruments over Kite's WebSocket. The server opens one connection in the background on the first call (it needs the paid Kite Connect plan and a current login), reconnects and resubscribes by itself, and keeps the latest tick of every subscribed instrument for ticker_get_ticks. Modes: ltp (last price), quote (default: last price, last quantity, average price, volume, buy/sell quantity, OHLC, change %), full (quote plus open interest, last trade time, exchange timestamp and 5 levels of bid/offer depth). Indices have no volume or depth. Subscribing an instrument again with another mode switches its mode. At most KITE_MCP_TICKER_MAX_SUBSCRIPTIONS instruments (default 1000; Kite allows 3000) can be subscribed. An empty instruments list only opens the connection, which is how to receive order updates (ticker_order_updates) without market data. This changes only the server's own streaming state; it places no orders.

NameTypeReqDescription
instrumentsarrayyesEXCHANGE:TRADINGSYMBOL names (NSE:INFY, NSE:NIFTY 50, NFO:NIFTY25NOVFUT) and/or numeric instrument tokens (408065). Names are looked up in the instrument list; if that cannot be loaded, use tokens.
modestring–ltp = last price only; quote = price, volume, OHLC, buy/sell quantity; full = quote plus open interest and 5-level market depth

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

ticker_unsubscribe ~115

Stop streaming instruments and drop their cached ticks. Instruments that were not subscribed are listed under not_subscribed. The WebSocket connection stays open (order updates keep arriving); ticker_stop closes it.

NameTypeReqDescription
instrumentsarrayyesEXCHANGE:TRADINGSYMBOL names (NSE:INFY, NSE:NIFTY 50, NFO:NIFTY25NOVFUT) and/or numeric instrument tokens (408065). Names are looked up in the instrument list; if that cannot be loaded, use tokens.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Kite Connect MCP server?

Kite Connect MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx kite-connect-mcp serve. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · kite-connect-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add techfreakworm-kite-connect-mcp -- uvx kite-connect-mcp serve
Common questions

What is the Kite Connect MCP server?

Kite Connect MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.techfreakworm/kite-connect-mcp. Zerodha Kite Connect v3 for AI agents: orders (dry-run by default), GTT, alerts, portfolio, quotes. This page covers its PyPI package (kite-connect-mcp).

Is the Kite Connect MCP server safe to use?

Kite Connect MCP scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Kite Connect MCP server expose?

Kite Connect MCP exposes 53 tools: session_status, login, complete_login, logout, get_profile, and 48 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 10,725 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Kite Connect MCP server still maintained?

Kite Connect MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Kite Connect MCP server under?

Kite Connect MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Kite Connect MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on Kite Connect MCP, covering Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health, Source repository and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Kite Connect MCP: Malware scan. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.