# RawMark (remote · rawmark.tech)

Documents to Markdown: PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML. Scanned PDF pages read by AI.

- Trust score: 81/100 (high trust)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- remote · `rawmark.tech`: 81/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://rawmark.tech/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.0.0`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Endpoint Security**: 80/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 70/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 223 tokens (~111/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 80/100
  - Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 71/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 0% of tool parameters carry a description.
  - Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).

## Install

### How do I install the RawMark MCP server?

RawMark is a hosted endpoint at https://rawmark.tech/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http sani96-rawmark 'https://rawmark.tech/mcp'
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sani96-rawmark": {
      "url": "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "sani96-rawmark": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.sani96-rawmark]
url = "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "sani96-rawmark": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://rawmark.tech/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add sani96-rawmark --url 'https://rawmark.tech/mcp' --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  sani96-rawmark:
    url: "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "sani96-rawmark": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add sani96-rawmark -t streamable-http -u 'https://rawmark.tech/mcp'
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sani96-rawmark": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rawmark.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-03 (score 81, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 80, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-30 (score 79, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-28 (score 78, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-26 (score 77, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-24 (score 76, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-22 (score 75, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-19 (score 74, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

## MCP tools (2)

### `convert_document` (~112 tokens)

Convert a document to Markdown

Convert a PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML or TXT file to Markdown. Give either `url` (a public link to the file) or `content_base64` plus `filename`. Scanned PDF pages are read by an AI vision model. `ai_accuracy` (paid plans) reads every PDF page with AI for exact tables. Each call uses one conversion.

Input parameters:

- `ai_accuracy` (boolean)
- `content_base64`
- `filename`
- `url`

Output parameters:

- `result` (string)

### `get_usage` (~29 tokens)

RawMark usage

What the caller's RawMark plan has left: conversions for a license key, or today's free conversions.

Output parameters:

- `result` (string)

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 81
- 2026-11-04: 81
- 2026-11-03: 81
- 2026-11-02: 80
- 2026-11-01: 80
- 2026-10-31: 79
- 2026-10-30: 79
- 2026-10-29: 78
- 2026-10-28: 78
- 2026-10-27: 77
- 2026-10-26: 77
- 2026-10-25: 76
- 2026-10-24: 76
- 2026-10-23: 75
- 2026-10-22: 75
- 2026-10-21: 74
- 2026-10-20: 74
- 2026-10-19: 74
- 2026-10-18: 73
- 2026-10-17: 73
- 2026-10-16: 72
- 2026-10-15: 72
- 2026-10-14: 71
- 2026-10-13: 71
- 2026-10-12: 70

## Common questions

### What is the RawMark MCP server?

RawMark is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Sani96/rawmark. Documents to Markdown: PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML. Scanned PDF pages read by AI. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rawmark.tech/mcp).

### Is the RawMark MCP server safe to use?

RawMark scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the RawMark MCP server expose?

RawMark exposes 2 tools: convert_document, get_usage. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 141 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Does the RawMark MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to RawMark without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

### Is the RawMark MCP server still maintained?

RawMark is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

### What did VerifyMCP test on the RawMark MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on RawMark, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://rawmark.tech/mcp
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark/changelog.json
- Trust report (JSON): https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/sani96-rawmark/rawmark