io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge
NPM · FIGBRIDGE-MCP
Free, local MCP bridge for Figma — HTML, CSS, Tailwind, tokens, agent handoff bundles.
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 87% of npm servers
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security89
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects basic-ftp 5.3.1, reached via puppeteer-core > @puppeteer/browsers > proxy-agent > pac-proxy-agent > get-uri > basic-ftp. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 55 of 175 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to rudraptpsingh/figbridge). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 147 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 6876 tokens (~134/item across 51 items; 51 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
- Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "delete_node" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 51 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 −5
- Stability: pass → 0.63 functional
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 24 Oct 26 0
- CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
- 22 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 21 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 17 Oct 26 +3
- Stability: 0.80 → pass security
- 16 Oct 26 +41
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → 0.80 ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/figbridge-mcp@0.4.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | rudraptpsingh/figbridge |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/rudraptpsingh/figbridge/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.4.0 |
| Rekor log index | 1778192314 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:ed204cf68a6fa654752ca28cc651de1d8d272c3624898ab051dfca3cc8f102a00bebf2b8b6c634c0af8a08c9020877723a8f09812fc3601d80c9cbbe6 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 4 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-c475-qrg2-pj4r | CVE-2026-102990 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-7pqw-9j4j-h8q3 | CVE-2026-19693 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H | no |
| GHSA-jmr9-qjv8-65gv | CVE-2026-56876 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | no |
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 175 packages
| Packages resolved | 175 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 55 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
visual_diff ~171
One-call visual reference: take a live Chrome screenshot of `url` AND export the Figma frame at `nodeId`, write both PNGs to `outDir` (default /tmp), and return their paths. Hand the paths to the Read tool to view side-by-side. Replaces the chrome-devtools-mcp + python-decode + manual-write dance.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | string | yes | Figma node id of the imported frame. |
| outDir | string | – | Directory to write PNGs into. Default /tmp. |
| prefix | string | – | Filename prefix. Default 'diff'. |
| scale | number | – | Figma export scale. Default 0.5. |
| url | string | yes | Live page URL. |
| width | number | – | Chrome viewport width. Default 1280. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y figbridge-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · figbridge-mcp
claude mcp add rudraptpsingh-figbridge -- npx -y figbridge-mcp
What is the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge. Free, local MCP bridge for Figma, HTML, CSS, Tailwind, tokens, agent handoff bundles. This page covers its npm package (figbridge-mcp).
Is the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server safe to use?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 4 known advisories against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server expose?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge exposes 51 tools: get_current_selection, get_last_export, list_history, get_tokens, bridge_status, and 46 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 6,876 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server still maintained?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge MCP server under?
io.github.rudraptpsingh/figbridge declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.