# Analyst Ratings (npm · @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings)

Analyst Ratings — today's US stock analyst upgrades, downgrades, coverage initiations and…

- Trust score: 83/100 (high trust)
- Change this week: +4
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- remote · `gateway.pipeworx.io`: 86/100, [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/analyst-ratings-mcp.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/analyst-ratings-mcp)
- npm · `@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings`: 83/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `npm`
- Package: `@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings`
- Version: `0.2.1`
- Transport: `stdio`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 100/100
  - No malware found by supply-chain analysis.
  - No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.
  - No install/post-install scripts declared.
  - No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess.
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 97/100
  - Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL.
  - Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-analyst-ratings).
  - Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).
  - Actively maintained (last published 5 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 66/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 502 tokens (~251/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 23/100
  - Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### How do I install the Analyst Ratings MCP server?

Analyst Ratings runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```bash
codex mcp add pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings --command npx --arg -y --arg @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"]
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings -t stdio -c npx -a -y @pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings"
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-05 (score 83, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-03 (score 82, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 81, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-30 (score 80, +1)

- [functional regression] Security disclosure: unverified → fail
- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.03
- [functional] Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.2.1

### 2026-10-29 (score 79)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (2)

### `analyst_upgrades_today` (~298 tokens)

Today's US stock analyst upgrades and downgrades, market-wide: every ratings action Wall Street brokerages published this session, with the ticker, the brokerage, the analyst, the old and new rating and the old and new price target. Use this for "which stocks were upgraded today", "analyst downgrades today", "today's price target changes" and "what did analysts initiate coverage on". Filter with `action` (upgrade, downgrade, initiated, price_target, reiterated) or narrow to one ticker with `symbol`. Sourced live from MarketBeat's daily ratings tables; covers US-listed equities (NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE American, OTC) by default.

Input parameters:

- `action` (string): Which ratings action to return. "upgrade" = rating raised, "downgrade" = rating cut, "initiated" = new coverage started, "price_target" = target raised/lowered/set with no rating change, "reiterated"…
- `limit` (number): Maximum rows to return (default 50, max 400).
- `symbol` (string): Optional ticker filter, e.g. "AAPL". Case-insensitive; returns only that symbol’s actions from today.
- `us_only` (boolean): Keep only US-listed exchanges (NYSE, NASDAQ, NYSE American, OTC). Default true — the combined feed also carries Toronto and London listings.

### `analyst_ratings_for_symbol` (~148 tokens)

Wall Street consensus analyst rating for one US stock: the mean rating (Buy/Hold/Sell), how many analysts cover it, and the list of brokerage firms publishing recommendations on it. Use for "what do analysts think of NVDA", "who covers Apple", "consensus rating for TSLA". Sourced live from Nasdaq’s public analyst endpoint. For what analysts DID today (upgrades, downgrades, price-target changes) use analyst_upgrades_today with `symbol` instead — this tool returns the standing consensus, not the day’s actions.

Input parameters:

- `symbol` (string, required): US ticker symbol, e.g. "AAPL", "NVDA", "AMGN".

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance, Dependencies. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 83
- 2026-11-04: 82
- 2026-11-03: 82
- 2026-11-02: 81
- 2026-11-01: 81
- 2026-10-31: 80
- 2026-10-30: 80
- 2026-10-29: 79

## Common questions

### What is the Analyst Ratings MCP server?

Analyst Ratings is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/analyst-ratings. Analyst Ratings, today's US stock analyst upgrades, downgrades, coverage initiations and… This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings).

### Is the Analyst Ratings MCP server safe to use?

Analyst Ratings scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Analyst Ratings MCP server expose?

Analyst Ratings exposes 2 tools: analyst_upgrades_today, analyst_ratings_for_symbol. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 446 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Is the Analyst Ratings MCP server still maintained?

Analyst Ratings is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

### What licence is the Analyst Ratings MCP server under?

Analyst Ratings declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

### What did VerifyMCP test on the Analyst Ratings MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Analyst Ratings, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.

## Links

- npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
- Socket report: https://socket.dev/npm/package/@pipeworx/mcp-analyst-ratings
- Repository: https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-analyst-ratings
- Website: https://pipeworx.io/packs/analyst-ratings
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings/changelog.json
- Trust report (JSON): https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/pipeworx-io-analyst-ratings/pipeworx-mcp-analyst-ratings