Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Physical Capability Cloud

REMOTE · CAPABILITY.NETWORK

Discover, hire, and verify real-world physical capability through MCP.

0 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 79% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category IoT and Hardware

Recent critical change

Authorization (1 Oct 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability85
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 22909 tokens (~88/item across 260 items; 256 tools + 4 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage98
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 92% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (3% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety97
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 13 of 15 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "get_transfer_graphs" implies "transfer" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Partial
  • An AI judge read all 258 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (14)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol
  • Capabilities

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: fail → pass ▲ security
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 96 to 99.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 89 to 93.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 86.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 76 to 79.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 69 to 73.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 59 to 63.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://capability.network/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=capability.network CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 14 Sept 2026 13 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 61e79ee07e783aedc9770a1b1a54789ebd0
SANs: *.capability.network, capability.network
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of capability.network. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
network. DS published 11416, 40414 8, 8 Verified
capability.network. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://capability.network/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://capability.network/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://capability.network/mcp
MCP tools · 256 exposed · ~22,670 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
update_job_status ~89

Update a job's status and optional progress percentage. Used by kernels to report job progress.

NameTypeReqDescription
jobIdstringyesJob ID
progressnumber–Progress percentage 0-100 (optional)
statusstringyesNew status (pending, queued, in_progress, paused, completed, failed, cancelled). 'running' is accepted as a legacy alias for in_progress.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

update_operator_channel ~114

Update an existing channel — toggle enabled, rewrite the describe contract, change the endpoint payload, etc. Merges into the existing record. The operator slug, id, and createdAt are immutable.

NameTypeReqDescription
credentialRefstring––
describestring––
directionstring––
enabledboolean––
endpointobject––
idstringyesChannel id (returned from attach_operator_channel).
labelstring––
replyContractstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

update_protocol ~87

Update an existing protocol template (must be in draft status). Returns updated name and version.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–Updated description
idstringyesProtocol template ID
namestring–Updated name
parametersarray–Updated parameters array
stepsarray–Updated steps array
versionstring–New version string (semver)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

validate_protocol ~54

Validate a protocol template against a specific kernel — checks capability availability, transfer compatibility, and automation level feasibility.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesProtocol template ID
kernelIdstring–Kernel ID to validate against (optional)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_bounty ~60

Verify bounty completion by scoring the delivered capability against requirements.

NameTypeReqDescription
bountyIdstringyesBounty ID to verify
jobIdstringyesJob ID that fulfilled the bounty
scorenumberyesVerification score (0-1)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_evidence_zk ~48

Verify a ZK proof by its proof ID. Checks the proof against its verification key and public inputs.

NameTypeReqDescription
proofIdstringyesID of the ZK proof to verify

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server?

Physical Capability Cloud is a hosted endpoint at https://capability.network/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · capability.network

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http network-capability-physical-capability-cloud 'https://capability.network/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server?

Physical Capability Cloud is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as network.capability/physical-capability-cloud. Discover, hire, and verify real-world physical capability through MCP. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://capability.network/mcp).

Is the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server safe to use?

Physical Capability Cloud scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server expose?

Physical Capability Cloud exposes 256 tools: provision_api_key, list_api_keys, revoke_api_key, setup_detect, setup_generate_config, and 251 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 22,670 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Physical Capability Cloud without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server still maintained?

Physical Capability Cloud is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Physical Capability Cloud MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 14 checks on Physical Capability Cloud, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 10 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.