# Business Frameworks (remote · business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev)

Operating judgement for businesses under $50M revenue. Free top layer; nodes and bundles over x402.

- Trust score: 70/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-10-24

## Components

- remote · `business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev`: 70/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `2026.10.10`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-10-24.

- **Endpoint Security**: 63/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one.
  - HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
  - HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 64/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1656 tokens (~276/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 40/100
  - Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
  - Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).

## Install

### How do I install the Business Frameworks MCP server?

Business Frameworks is a hosted endpoint at https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks 'https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp'
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks": {
      "url": "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks]
url = "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks --url 'https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp' --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks:
    url: "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks -t streamable-http -u 'https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp'
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-10-23 (score 70, 0)

- [security] The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads
- [security] Tool “bf_apply_decision” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “bf_decision_schema” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “bf_read_bundle” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “bf_read_node” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “bf_resolve” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_apply_decision” now declares an output schema
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_catalogue” now declares an output schema
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_decision_schema” now declares an output schema
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_read_bundle” now declares an output schema
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_read_node” now declares an output schema
- [functional improvement] Tool “bf_resolve” now declares an output schema
- [functional] First check of Tool coverage: 100
- [functional] Server version: 2026.10.13 → 2026.10.22
- [cosmetic] “bf_decision_schema” reworded the description of “decision”
- [cosmetic] “bf_read_node” reworded the description of “variant”

### 2026-10-22 (score 70, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-21 (score 69, 0)

- [functional] Server version: 2026.10.10 → 2026.10.13

### 2026-10-20 (score 69, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-18 (score 68, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-16 (score 67, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-14 (score 66, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-13 (score 65, 0)

- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.03

## MCP tools (6)

### `bf_catalogue` (~180 tokens)

Business Frameworks: catalogue

Lists every Business Frameworks node: handle, title, layer, token count, price, whether it is free, and whether its decision rule can be run on numbers. Business Frameworks is operating judgement for running a business from launch to about $50M in revenue: value, cash flow, risk (the cost of capital) and growth, down to ten decision rules. Call this first, once, to choose which node answers the question; pass `branch` to see one branch only. Free. Do not use it for businesses above about $50M in revenue, for tax, legal or accounting treatment, or for market data: it holds judgement and rules, not figures about any company.

Input parameters:

- `branch` (string): One of: equation, value, cash-flow, risk, growth, decision, market. Omit for the whole catalogue.

Output parameters:

- `access` (string)
- `bundles` (object)
- `cite_as` (string)
- `license_url` (string)
- `nodes` (array)
- `payment` (string)
- `product` (string)
- `scope` (string)
- `version` (string)

### `bf_read_node` (~356 tokens)

Business Frameworks: read a node

Returns one node with its citations and a cite-as line; `variant` chooses full (the default), terse (the lede alone) or agent (the same text as fields: scope, inputs, rule, action, check, units, example, the applied route, the recheck, and two strings to paste: recheck_note and closing_citation) at the same price. Free nodes (marked in bf_catalogue) cost nothing; the rest cost their catalogue price ($0.02 to $0.05, USDC on Base over x402), charged once per call, only when the node is returned. Call it with a `path` from bf_catalogue when the question needs that node's rule; prefer variant agent when you will answer from it (the decision in one sentence, the first step, the reason, the next check, the offer to write the recheck into the user's notes, then closing_citation last). Read the free parent first; use bf_resolve when the question takes several nodes. Do not call a paid path to see what it contains: the catalogue line says what it covers; a rule on numbers is bf_apply_decision.

Input parameters:

- `path` (string, required): Node path from bf_catalogue, e.g. "risk" (free) or "risk/decide/hurdle" (paid). A full handle is accepted.
- `variant` (string): full (default): lede, conditions and reasoning; terse: the lede alone; agent: the same text as fields (scope, inputs, rule, action, check, reasoning, units, example, apply, recheck, recheck_note, clo…

Output parameters:

- `action` (string|null)
- `apply`
- `check` (string|null)
- `citations` (array)
- `cite_as` (string)
- `cites` (array)
- `closing_citation` (string)
- `example`
- `free_first`
- `handle` (string)
- `inputs` (string|null)
- `kind` (string)
- `leads_to` (array)
- `levels` (object)
- `reasoning` (string|null)
- `recheck`
- `recheck_note` (string|null)
- `related` (array)
- `rule` (string|null)
- `scope` (object)
- `text` (string)
- `title` (string)
- `tokens` (number)
- `units`
- `url` (string)
- `variant` (string)
- `versions` (array)

### `bf_decision_schema` (~177 tokens)

Business Frameworks: decision input schema

Returns the input schema, an example input, the price and the fit record (what the framework does for this decision by model, before paying) for one of the applied decisions (reinvest or distribute, build or run for cash, cash cycle, runway, owner pay, hurdle rate, concentration, pace of growth, price, adjacency; and, in the market branch, verdict, pricing power, binding node, rent, shock). Free. Call it before bf_apply_decision to learn which numbers the rule needs and what each one means; without `decision` it lists them all. Do not guess missing inputs to fill the schema: ask the user for the figures the business actually has.

Input parameters:

- `decision` (string): Decision path, e.g. "risk/decide/hurdle". Omit to list the fifteen.

Output parameters:

- `decision` (string)
- `decisions` (array)
- `example_input` (object)
- `fit` (object)
- `handle` (string)
- `how` (string)
- `input_schema` (object)
- `price_usd` (string|number|null)
- `summary` (string)
- `title` (string)

### `bf_apply_decision` (~236 tokens)

Business Frameworks: apply a decision rule

Runs one decision node's rule on the numbers you send and returns the computed figures, a verdict, the actions in order, the check to keep and the node text with its citations. Deterministic: the result comes from the published rule, not from a model. Costs the decision's catalogue price ($0.05, USDC on Base over x402); the input is checked first, and an input the rule cannot use is refused without charge. Call it when the user has the figures for a specific decision in a business under about $50M in revenue and wants the rule's answer for them; get the schema from bf_decision_schema first. When the question gives figures for a decision, the applied route computes them; the answer reports its result and does not recompute it. Do not call it with invented or placeholder figures, and do not treat the verdict as tax, legal or investment advice.

Input parameters:

- `decision` (string, required): Decision path from bf_decision_schema, e.g. "cash-flow/decide/runway".
- `input` (object, required): The figures, shaped as that decision's input_schema.

Output parameters:

- `applied` (object)
- `cite_as` (string)
- `handle` (string)
- `node` (object)

### `bf_resolve` (~367 tokens)

Business Frameworks: quote the bundle for a task

Quotes the minimal set of nodes that answers a broad task — a decision bundle, a market (chain) bundle or a cross bundle — with its price — one flat price, USD 0.05, with or without its scale band — stated before anything is paid. Deterministic and free: a named bundle or decision wins, then the input fields sent, then the authored patterns of the question; on ambiguity it returns candidates with their task lines, and with no match the task lines to choose from. Call it when the user's question takes more than one node (a whole decision with its context, a supply chain read, a shock traced to a seat), passing the question, revenue_usd and chain_position when known; then buy the quote with bf_read_bundle or read nodes one at a time with bf_read_node. Do not use it for a single term or a single rule, which bf_catalogue and bf_read_node answer more cheaply, and do not treat a quote as an answer: it names the nodes and the price, nothing more.

Input parameters:

- `bundle` (string): A bundle id from a task line, when the caller already knows which.
- `chain_position` (string): Where the business sits on the chain being read: binding_upstream, binding_downstream, at_binding or unknown.
- `decision` (string): A decision path when the task is one decision, e.g. "cash-flow/decide/runway".
- `inputs` (object): The figures already in hand, by field name; the resolver reads the names, not the values.
- `question` (string): The task in the user's words (up to 2,000 characters).
- `revenue_usd` (number): Annual revenue in US dollars, to pick the scale band.

Output parameters:

- `access` (string)
- `bundle` (object)
- `by` (string)
- `candidates` (array)
- `how` (string)
- `match` (string)
- `tasks` (array)

### `bf_read_bundle` (~221 tokens)

Business Frameworks: read a quoted bundle

Returns the nodes of one bundle in order — the central node full, the supporting nodes terse — with citations and a cite-as line per node, on one settlement at the quoted price (a flat $0.05 for every bundle, band included; USDC on Base over x402). Pass the bundle id from bf_resolve or bf_catalogue, and a band to add the scale band for the business's revenue. Call it after bf_resolve has quoted the bundle and the user accepts the price; the quote's url is the same resource over HTTP. Do not call it to browse: the quote already lists the nodes and the price, and a narrow question is cheaper node by node through bf_read_node.

Input parameters:

- `band` (string): A scale band to add, by slug ("1-5m") or label ("$1–5M"); omit for the bundle without a band.
- `bundle` (string, required): Bundle id from bf_resolve or bf_catalogue, e.g. "runway"; the quote url is accepted too.

Output parameters:

- `cite_as` (string)
- `handle` (string)
- `id` (string)
- `nodes` (array)
- `price_usd` (string|number|null)
- `task` (string)

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-10-24: 70
- 2026-10-23: 70
- 2026-10-22: 70
- 2026-10-21: 69
- 2026-10-20: 69
- 2026-10-19: 68
- 2026-10-18: 68
- 2026-10-17: 67
- 2026-10-16: 67
- 2026-10-15: 66
- 2026-10-14: 66
- 2026-10-13: 65
- 2026-10-12: 65

## Common questions

### What is the Business Frameworks MCP server?

Business Frameworks is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.matryoshka-paradigms/business-frameworks. Operating judgement for businesses under $50M revenue. Free top layer; nodes and bundles over x402. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp).

### Is the Business Frameworks MCP server safe to use?

Business Frameworks scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Business Frameworks MCP server expose?

Business Frameworks exposes 6 tools: bf_catalogue, bf_read_node, bf_decision_schema, bf_apply_decision, bf_resolve, bf_read_bundle. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,537 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Does the Business Frameworks MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Business Frameworks without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

### Is the Business Frameworks MCP server still maintained?

Business Frameworks is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/mcp
- Repository: https://github.com/matryoshka-paradigms/business-frameworks
- Website: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Matryoshka-Paradigms/business-frameworks
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/matryoshka-paradigms-business-frameworks/business-frameworks