Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce
REMOTE · AXIS-API-6C7Z.ONRENDER.COM · SCANNED SEP 21
Codebase intelligence for agents: 152 structured artifacts across 21 programs, one call.
Available components
Recent critical change
Authorization (5 Sept 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the tool list to see what that exposes. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint returned HTTP 503. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server?
Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is a hosted endpoint at https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox 'https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox": {
"url": "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox] url = "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox --url 'https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox:
url: "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox -t streamable-http -u 'https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 11 Sept 26 −53
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 5 Sept 26 +53
- Authorization: unverified → fail ▼ critical
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- 1 Sept 26 −53
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Stability: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 30 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 94 to 97.
- 29 Aug 26 −1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 97 to 94.
- 27 Aug 26 0
- Tool “analyze_files” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “analyze_repo” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “assemble_representment” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “closer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “deploy” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_snapshot” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_web_research” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “improve_my_agent_with_axis” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “prepare_agentic_purchasing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 26 Aug 26 +2
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 +51
- Authorization: unverified → fail ▼ critical
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 0.5.3 ▼ security
- Tool “discover_commerce_tools” was removed ▼ security
- Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- New tool “delete_snapshot”, which the server declares destructive security
- Tool “list_programs” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_and_discover_tools” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “analyze_files” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “analyze_repo” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “closer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “deploy” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_document_parsing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_object_storage” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_speech_to_text” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_text_to_speech” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_vector_database” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_web_research” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “iliad_web_research_crawl” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “improve_my_agent_with_axis” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “ping_payment” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- New tool “get_install_manifest” functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 24 Jul 2026 | 22 Oct 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 756bcb97dcf1455f0ebf70e5dbe07256 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 503 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp | HTTP error | 503 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
prepare_agentic_purchasing ~455
Prepare a codebase for agentic purchasing and return a readiness score plus commerce artifacts. Requires Authorization: Bearer <api_key>; paid analysis records a new snapshot and may return auth, quota, payment, file-limit, or validation errors. Pricing: $3.00 standard, $1.00 lite budget mode, $250 engineer per run. Lite mode returns the readiness score + top 3 gaps only, with an artifacts_note pointing at standard mode for the full artifact bundle — it does NOT include the artifacts themselves. Standard and engineer modes return the full bundle. focus_areas is recorded and echoed back in the response for the caller's own bookkeeping; it does not filter which artifacts are generated. Use this when you need AP2/UCP/Visa, CE 3.0 dispute evidence, checkout, dispute, and negotiation hardening. Engineer mode (X-Agent-Mode: engineer — Commerce Integration) also emits a deployable x402/AP2/PAI'D endpoint + a runnable sandbox test + a schema-validatable CE 3.0 pack + a transparent dispute-readiness score (a working integration, not just a score), plus a deployable Stripe network-token read adapter when a stripe signal is detected. Use discover_agentic_purchasing_needs instead when you only need workflow triage.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_type | string | – | Consuming agent type hint |
| budget_per_run_cents | number | – | Agent budget for this call in cents |
| files | array | yes | Array of {path, content} objects representing source files |
| focus | string | – | Analysis focus (default: purchasing) |
| focus_areas | array | – | Compliance focus areas, recorded and echoed back in the response for the caller's own reference — does not filter which artifacts are generated. |
| frameworks | array | yes | Detected or known frameworks |
| goals | array | yes | Project goals |
| project_name | string | yes | Name of the project |
| project_type | string | yes | Project type (web_application, api_service, cli_tool, library, monorepo) |
| referral_token | string | – | Optional referral token from another agent |
| spending_window | string | – | Agent spending window |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifact_count | number | yes | – |
| programs_executed | array | yes | – |
| project_id | string | yes | – |
| snapshot_id | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| summary | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
prepare_agentic_purchasing_preview ~217
Compute a free Purchasing Readiness Score (0-100) and gap list for a codebase without generating artifacts. No auth, no charge, no snapshot persisted. Hard caps: 25 files / 50KB per file / 1MB total. Returns score, risk_level, top gaps, frameworks detected, and which AXIS programs would close which gaps. Use this to triage 'should I pay for the full hardening bundle?' before calling prepare_agentic_purchasing. The paid version generates the full artifact bundle including CE 3.0 dispute evidence, SCA exemption matrix, and TAP interop.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| files | array | yes | Source files to triage (max 25 files, 50KB each, 1MB total) |
| frameworks | array | – | Optional framework hints |
| project_name | string | yes | Name of the project being previewed |
| project_type | string | – | Optional project type hint (web_application, api_service, cli_tool, library, monorepo) |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| conversion | object | – | – |
| cost | string | – | – |
| frameworks_detected | array | – | – |
| gaps | array | – | – |
| interpretation | string | – | – |
| risk_level | string | – | – |
| score | number | – | Current Purchasing Readiness Score (0-100) for the codebase as submitted |
| strengths | array | – | – |
| top_3_gaps | array | – | – |
| what_axis_would_add | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
roblox_compliance_check ~127
Run Roblox R15 compliance checks against a mesh. Status: **planned_proxy** — an estate-flagged proxy is planned (see discover_estate_tools for the sibling's own direct endpoint and price today). Calls return a planned-capability envelope pointing at AXIS Foundry (https://api.avatar.jonathanarvay.com/mcp) as the recommended interim provider. When the estate proxy ships, the dispatch handler swaps in without changing this schema.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | string | yes | Path to mesh file (.glb, .obj, .stl, etc.) |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _planned | boolean | yes | Always true while this tool is in development. |
| capability_id | string | – | Capability slug — matches capability-map.yaml for a non-estate entry, or a self-describing estate_<sibling>_<tool> slug for an estate entry. |
| message | string | – | Human-readable status note. |
| recommended_provider | object | – | Provider to call directly today, including its price when known. |
| result | object | – | Roblox R15 compliance results from Foundry's canonical pipeline outputs. |
| status | string | – | planned_proxy or planned_owned. |
No examples provided.
sca_exemption_decision ~442
Decide the lighter-SCA path for a single transaction using AXIS's published 7-priority PSD2 exemption matrix (the same decideScaExemption engine that renders the SCA Exemption Decision Matrix in generated artifacts). Input: amount_eur (required, PSD2 thresholds are EUR-denominated — convert before calling) plus optional context flags (secure corporate program, MIT, fixed recurring + prior SCA, trusted beneficiary + prior SCA, one-leg-out, acquirer TRA fraud rate in basis points). Returns the chosen exemption, its priority, sca_required, rationale, fallback path, all applicable candidates, the rendered priority matrix, and a sha256 reproducibility proof. Free, no auth, deterministic, no side effects. HONESTY: decision-support only, NOT an authorization oracle — final exemption eligibility is decided by the acquirer/issuer; TRA caps use published EBA RTS Art. 15 bands, not your acquirer's live fraud rate.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount_eur | number | yes | Transaction amount in EUR (PSD2 thresholds are EUR-denominated). |
| has_prior_sca | boolean | – | A prior SCA exists — gates recurring_fixed and trusted_beneficiary. |
| is_merchant_initiated | boolean | – | MIT with stored credential + original SCA reference (out of SCA scope). |
| is_one_leg_out | boolean | – | Payer or payee outside the EEA (territorial scope, not a formal exemption). |
| is_recurring_fixed | boolean | – | Fixed-amount subsequent collection (RTS Art. 13). Requires has_prior_sca. |
| is_secure_corporate | boolean | – | Dedicated/lodged corporate card program (RTS Art. 16). |
| is_trusted_beneficiary | boolean | – | Merchant on the cardholder's trusted list (RTS Art. 12). Requires has_prior_sca. |
| tra_acquirer_fraud_bps | number | – | Acquirer reference fraud rate in basis points (EBA RTS Art. 15 bands: <=1 → €500 cap, <=6 → €250, <=13 → €100). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| caveat | string | yes | Decision-support-only honesty caveat. |
| decision | object | yes | {exemption, priority, sca_required, rationale, fallback, candidates, tra_cap_eur?}. |
| matrix | string | yes | The rendered 7-priority SCA Exemption Decision Matrix (markdown) this decision was taken from. |
| proof | object | yes | {algo:'sha256', digest, over[]} — reproducibility proof over canonical input+decision. |
No examples provided.
score_dispute_readiness ~339
Score how ready a disputed transaction's EVIDENCE FILE is for representment, per Visa reason-code family, using the transparent scoreWinProbability heuristic (win-prob-v0: hand-set, documented logistic coefficients — exported, inspectable, monotonic in evidence). Input: reason_code + the evidence on file (CE 3.0 eligibility, matching data elements, prior undisputed transactions, delivery proof, AVS/CVV, 3DS, signed mandate, customer communication). Returns the heuristic score, band, top missing evidence (what to capture next), recommended action, rationale, model version, and a sha256 reproducibility proof. Free, no auth, deterministic. HONESTY (read this): this scores evidence-capture readiness and is NOT a dispute-win prediction — the v0 heuristic is NOT empirically calibrated against real network outcomes, is NOT a Visa-published or Visa-endorsed win rate, and AXIS does not publish win-rate estimates. Treat it as a prioritization signal for evidence gathering only; always follow your operator's dispute policy.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evidence | object | – | Evidence on file: {ce3Eligible?, matchingDataElements? (0-5), priorUndisputedTransactions? (0-10), hasDeliveryProof?, hasAvsMatch?, hasCvvMatch?, has3dsAuthenticated?, hasSignedMandate?, hasCustomerC… |
| reason_code | string | yes | Visa dispute reason code (e.g. '10.4', '13.1', '12.5'). Unknown codes fall back to a documented default family. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclaimer | string | yes | The NOT-a-win-prediction honesty disclaimer (always present). |
| proof | object | yes | {algo:'sha256', digest, over[]} reproducibility proof. |
| readiness | object | yes | {reasonCode, readiness_score (0-1 heuristic score), band, topMissingEvidence[], recommendedAction, rationale[], modelVersion}. |
No examples provided.
search_and_discover_tools ~125
Search AXIS programs by keyword and return ranked matches with artifact paths. Free, no auth, and no stateful side effects. Example: q=checkout returns commerce-relevant programs first. Use this when you know the outcome you want but not the right program. Use list_programs instead for the full catalog, get_install_manifest for install metadata, or discover_agentic_purchasing_needs for purchasing-specific triage.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| program | string | – | Optional: filter results to a specific program name |
| q | string | – | Search query — keyword or phrase |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| program_filter | string|null | yes | – |
| query | string|null | yes | – |
| results | array | yes | – |
| total_matches | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server?
Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.lastmanupinc-hub/axis-toolbox. Codebase intelligence for agents: 152 structured artifacts across 21 programs, one call. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://axis-api-6c7z.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server safe to use?
Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce scores 23 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server expose?
Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce exposes 44 tools: analyze_repo, analyze_files, list_programs, get_snapshot, delete_snapshot, and 39 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 12,112 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server still maintained?
Axis Iliad — Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.