Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce

REMOTE · API.ILIAD.TRUSTFABRIC.AI

Codebase intelligence for agents: 152 structured artifacts across 21 programs, one call.

65 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 47% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security66
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 12195 tokens (~277/item across 44 items; 44 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
  • Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 3 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 45 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 14 Oct 26 63

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=api.iliad.trustfabric.ai CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 31 Aug 2026 29 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6020d7e1a62799fad580595dce6340e6cdd
SANs: api.iliad.trustfabric.ai
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of api.iliad.trustfabric.ai. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
ai. present 3799 8 Verified
trustfabric.ai. present 2371 13 Verified
api.iliad.trustfabric.ai. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp
MCP tools · 44 exposed · ~12,112 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
prepare_agentic_purchasing ~455

Prepare a codebase for agentic purchasing and return a readiness score plus commerce artifacts. Requires Authorization: Bearer <api_key>; paid analysis records a new snapshot and may return auth, quota, payment, file-limit, or validation errors. Pricing: $3.00 standard, $1.00 lite budget mode, $250 engineer per run. Lite mode returns the readiness score + top 3 gaps only, with an artifacts_note pointing at standard mode for the full artifact bundle — it does NOT include the artifacts themselves. Standard and engineer modes return the full bundle. focus_areas is recorded and echoed back in the response for the caller's own bookkeeping; it does not filter which artifacts are generated. Use this when you need AP2/UCP/Visa, CE 3.0 dispute evidence, checkout, dispute, and negotiation hardening. Engineer mode (X-Agent-Mode: engineer — Commerce Integration) also emits a deployable x402/AP2/PAI'D endpoint + a runnable sandbox test + a schema-validatable CE 3.0 pack + a transparent dispute-readiness score (a working integration, not just a score), plus a deployable Stripe network-token read adapter when a stripe signal is detected. Use discover_agentic_purchasing_needs instead when you only need workflow triage.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_typestring–Consuming agent type hint
budget_per_run_centsnumber–Agent budget for this call in cents
filesarrayyesArray of {path, content} objects representing source files
focusstring–Analysis focus (default: purchasing)
focus_areasarray–Compliance focus areas, recorded and echoed back in the response for the caller's own reference — does not filter which artifacts are generated.
frameworksarrayyesDetected or known frameworks
goalsarrayyesProject goals
project_namestringyesName of the project
project_typestringyesProject type (web_application, api_service, cli_tool, library, monorepo)
referral_tokenstring–Optional referral token from another agent
spending_windowstring–Agent spending window
NameTypeReqDescription
artifact_countnumberyes–
programs_executedarrayyes–
project_idstringyes–
snapshot_idstringyes–
statusstringyes–
summaryobjectyes–

No examples provided.

prepare_agentic_purchasing_preview ~217

Compute a free Purchasing Readiness Score (0-100) and gap list for a codebase without generating artifacts. No auth, no charge, no snapshot persisted. Hard caps: 25 files / 50KB per file / 1MB total. Returns score, risk_level, top gaps, frameworks detected, and which AXIS programs would close which gaps. Use this to triage 'should I pay for the full hardening bundle?' before calling prepare_agentic_purchasing. The paid version generates the full artifact bundle including CE 3.0 dispute evidence, SCA exemption matrix, and TAP interop.

NameTypeReqDescription
filesarrayyesSource files to triage (max 25 files, 50KB each, 1MB total)
frameworksarray–Optional framework hints
project_namestringyesName of the project being previewed
project_typestring–Optional project type hint (web_application, api_service, cli_tool, library, monorepo)
NameTypeReqDescription
conversionobject––
coststring––
frameworks_detectedarray––
gapsarray––
interpretationstring––
risk_levelstring––
scorenumber–Current Purchasing Readiness Score (0-100) for the codebase as submitted
strengthsarray––
top_3_gapsarray––
what_axis_would_addarray––

No examples provided.

roblox_compliance_check ~127

Run Roblox R15 compliance checks against a mesh. Status: **planned_proxy** — an estate-flagged proxy is planned (see discover_estate_tools for the sibling's own direct endpoint and price today). Calls return a planned-capability envelope pointing at AXIS Foundry (https://api.avatar.jonathanarvay.com/mcp) as the recommended interim provider. When the estate proxy ships, the dispatch handler swaps in without changing this schema.

NameTypeReqDescription
file_pathstringyesPath to mesh file (.glb, .obj, .stl, etc.)
NameTypeReqDescription
_plannedbooleanyesAlways true while this tool is in development.
capability_idstring–Capability slug — matches capability-map.yaml for a non-estate entry, or a self-describing estate_<sibling>_<tool> slug for an estate entry.
messagestring–Human-readable status note.
recommended_providerobject–Provider to call directly today, including its price when known.
resultobject–Roblox R15 compliance results from Foundry's canonical pipeline outputs.
statusstring–planned_proxy or planned_owned.

No examples provided.

sca_exemption_decision ~442

Decide the lighter-SCA path for a single transaction using AXIS's published 7-priority PSD2 exemption matrix (the same decideScaExemption engine that renders the SCA Exemption Decision Matrix in generated artifacts). Input: amount_eur (required, PSD2 thresholds are EUR-denominated — convert before calling) plus optional context flags (secure corporate program, MIT, fixed recurring + prior SCA, trusted beneficiary + prior SCA, one-leg-out, acquirer TRA fraud rate in basis points). Returns the chosen exemption, its priority, sca_required, rationale, fallback path, all applicable candidates, the rendered priority matrix, and a sha256 reproducibility proof. Free, no auth, deterministic, no side effects. HONESTY: decision-support only, NOT an authorization oracle — final exemption eligibility is decided by the acquirer/issuer; TRA caps use published EBA RTS Art. 15 bands, not your acquirer's live fraud rate.

NameTypeReqDescription
amount_eurnumberyesTransaction amount in EUR (PSD2 thresholds are EUR-denominated).
has_prior_scaboolean–A prior SCA exists — gates recurring_fixed and trusted_beneficiary.
is_merchant_initiatedboolean–MIT with stored credential + original SCA reference (out of SCA scope).
is_one_leg_outboolean–Payer or payee outside the EEA (territorial scope, not a formal exemption).
is_recurring_fixedboolean–Fixed-amount subsequent collection (RTS Art. 13). Requires has_prior_sca.
is_secure_corporateboolean–Dedicated/lodged corporate card program (RTS Art. 16).
is_trusted_beneficiaryboolean–Merchant on the cardholder's trusted list (RTS Art. 12). Requires has_prior_sca.
tra_acquirer_fraud_bpsnumber–Acquirer reference fraud rate in basis points (EBA RTS Art. 15 bands: <=1 → €500 cap, <=6 → €250, <=13 → €100).
NameTypeReqDescription
caveatstringyesDecision-support-only honesty caveat.
decisionobjectyes{exemption, priority, sca_required, rationale, fallback, candidates, tra_cap_eur?}.
matrixstringyesThe rendered 7-priority SCA Exemption Decision Matrix (markdown) this decision was taken from.
proofobjectyes{algo:'sha256', digest, over[]} — reproducibility proof over canonical input+decision.

No examples provided.

score_dispute_readiness ~339

Score how ready a disputed transaction's EVIDENCE FILE is for representment, per Visa reason-code family, using the transparent scoreWinProbability heuristic (win-prob-v0: hand-set, documented logistic coefficients — exported, inspectable, monotonic in evidence). Input: reason_code + the evidence on file (CE 3.0 eligibility, matching data elements, prior undisputed transactions, delivery proof, AVS/CVV, 3DS, signed mandate, customer communication). Returns the heuristic score, band, top missing evidence (what to capture next), recommended action, rationale, model version, and a sha256 reproducibility proof. Free, no auth, deterministic. HONESTY (read this): this scores evidence-capture readiness and is NOT a dispute-win prediction — the v0 heuristic is NOT empirically calibrated against real network outcomes, is NOT a Visa-published or Visa-endorsed win rate, and AXIS does not publish win-rate estimates. Treat it as a prioritization signal for evidence gathering only; always follow your operator's dispute policy.

NameTypeReqDescription
evidenceobject–Evidence on file: {ce3Eligible?, matchingDataElements? (0-5), priorUndisputedTransactions? (0-10), hasDeliveryProof?, hasAvsMatch?, hasCvvMatch?, has3dsAuthenticated?, hasSignedMandate?, hasCustomerC…
reason_codestringyesVisa dispute reason code (e.g. '10.4', '13.1', '12.5'). Unknown codes fall back to a documented default family.
NameTypeReqDescription
disclaimerstringyesThe NOT-a-win-prediction honesty disclaimer (always present).
proofobjectyes{algo:'sha256', digest, over[]} reproducibility proof.
readinessobjectyes{reasonCode, readiness_score (0-1 heuristic score), band, topMissingEvidence[], recommendedAction, rationale[], modelVersion}.

No examples provided.

search_and_discover_tools ~125

Search AXIS programs by keyword and return ranked matches with artifact paths. Free, no auth, and no stateful side effects. Example: q=checkout returns commerce-relevant programs first. Use this when you know the outcome you want but not the right program. Use list_programs instead for the full catalog, get_install_manifest for install metadata, or discover_agentic_purchasing_needs for purchasing-specific triage.

NameTypeReqDescription
programstring–Optional: filter results to a specific program name
qstring–Search query — keyword or phrase
NameTypeReqDescription
program_filterstring|nullyes–
querystring|nullyes–
resultsarrayyes–
total_matchesnumberyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server?

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is a hosted endpoint at https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.iliad.trustfabric.ai

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http lastmanupinc-hub-axis-toolbox 'https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server?

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.lastmanupinc-hub/axis-toolbox. Codebase intelligence for agents: 152 structured artifacts across 21 programs, one call. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.iliad.trustfabric.ai/mcp).

Is the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server safe to use?

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server expose?

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce exposes 44 tools: analyze_repo, analyze_files, list_programs, get_snapshot, delete_snapshot, and 39 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 12,112 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce MCP server still maintained?

Axis Iliad - Codebase Intelligence For Agentic Commerce is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.