# AI Visibility Checker (mcpb · aivis.mcpb)

AI visibility checker: GPTBot vs OAI-SearchBot, robots.txt audit, raw-HTML schema. 165 crawlers.

- Trust score: 54/100 (low)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-09-20

## Components

- mcpb · `aivis.mcpb`: 54/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb)
- oci · `ghcr.io/krisdiallo/aivis:1.5.3`: 50/100, [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/ghcr-io-krisdiallo-aivis-1-5-3.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/ghcr-io-krisdiallo-aivis-1-5-3)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `mcpb`
- Package: `https://github.com/krisdiallo/ecom-agent/releases/download/v1.5.3/aivis.mcpb`
- Version: `1.5.3`
- Transport: `stdio`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-09-20.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 13/100
  - Malware scan not yet available for this package.
  - Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.
  - No install/post-install scripts declared.
  - Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 45/100
  - Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL.
  - Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published.
  - Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).
  - Actively maintained (last published 22 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 77/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).
  - Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 426 tokens (~213/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 77/100
  - Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 60/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

- Download bundle: `https://github.com/krisdiallo/ecom-agent/releases/download/v1.5.3/aivis.mcpb`

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-09-20 (score 54, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-17 (score 53, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-15 (score 52, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-13 (score 51, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-11 (score 50, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-09 (score 49, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-07 (score 48, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-09-05 (score 47, +4)

- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.27

## MCP tools (2)

### `check_ai_visibility` (~220 tokens)

Check whether AI assistants can find, read and transact with an ecommerce store. Three checks: (1) robots.txt, distinguishing crawlers whose blocking removes you from AI answers (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot, Amzn-SearchBot, Applebot) from training-only crawlers where blocking costs nothing (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended); (2) product page RAW HTML — not the rendered DOM, because most AI crawlers do not run JavaScript — covering structured data, offer completeness and how many concrete measurements the page gives; (3) the agent-commerce layer (Universal Commerce Protocol / MCP), which decides whether an agent can actually buy rather than merely describe. Read-only: nothing is created, purchased or uploaded.

Input parameters:

- `pages` (integer): Sample N product pages to see whether a problem is systemic rather than a one-off.
- `store` (string, required): Store domain, e.g. 'allbirds.com'.
- `url` (string): Optional specific product page URL to check.

### `build_recommendation_test` (~206 tokens)

Generate the prompt set for testing whether AI assistants actually recommend a brand in its category, plus a scoring rubric. This tool does NOT query any assistant — it cannot, and any tool claiming a definitive 'AI ranking' is ahead of the evidence, because rankings are not public and vary by wording, location and session. What it does is remove the part that does not scale: writing varied, non-leading prompts and scoring the answers consistently. If you (the calling assistant) can search the web, run these yourself and report the results back to the user. Otherwise hand them to the user to run monthly.

Input parameters:

- `brand` (string, required): Brand name, e.g. 'Allbirds'.
- `category` (string, required): What they sell, in the words a buyer would use, e.g. 'merino wool sneakers'.
- `market` (string): Optional market/locale, e.g. 'UK'. Answers vary by location, so a result is only comparable within one.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-09-20: 54
- 2026-09-19: 53
- 2026-09-18: 53
- 2026-09-17: 53
- 2026-09-16: 52
- 2026-09-15: 52
- 2026-09-14: 51
- 2026-09-13: 51
- 2026-09-12: 50
- 2026-09-11: 50
- 2026-09-10: 49
- 2026-09-09: 49
- 2026-09-08: 48
- 2026-09-07: 48
- 2026-09-06: 47
- 2026-09-05: 47
- 2026-09-04: 43
- 2026-09-03: 43
- 2026-09-02: 43
- 2026-09-01: 43
- 2026-08-31: 43
- 2026-08-30: 43
- 2026-08-29: 43
- 2026-08-28: 43

## Common questions

### What is the AI Visibility Checker MCP server?

AI Visibility Checker is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.krisdiallo/aivis. AI visibility checker: GPTBot vs OAI-SearchBot, robots.txt audit, raw-HTML schema. 165 crawlers. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/krisdiallo/ecom-agent/releases/download/v1.5.3/aivis.mcpb).

### Is the AI Visibility Checker MCP server safe to use?

AI Visibility Checker scores 54 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the AI Visibility Checker MCP server expose?

AI Visibility Checker exposes 2 tools: check_ai_visibility, build_recommendation_test. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 426 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### What licence is the AI Visibility Checker MCP server under?

AI Visibility Checker declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

## Links

- Repository: https://github.com/krisdiallo/ecom-agent
- Website: https://krisdiallo.github.io/ecom-agent/ai-visibility-study.html
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/krisdiallo-aivis/https-github-com-krisdiallo-ecom-agent-releases-download-v1-5-3-aivis-mcpb