Moretes Architect MCP
REMOTE · MCP.MORETES.COM · 2 COMPONENTS
Evidence-first architecture workbench: 48 deterministic tools, 10 architect personas, any cloud
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 57% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 3688 tokens (~55/item across 66 items; 48 tools + 18 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (88% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "agent_eval_plan" implies "eval" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 50 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 27 Oct 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.moretes.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.moretes.com | CN=Amazon ECDSA 256 M01,O=Amazon,C=US | 26 Oct 2026 | 11 May 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 36c051710f03c96dfee5eebf83cd902 |
| SANs: mcp.moretes.com | ||||||
| CN=Amazon ECDSA 256 M01,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) | CN=Amazon Root CA 3,O=Amazon,C=US | 23 Aug 2022 | 23 Aug 2030 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 773126684d577c0fcf8d3a342bea86f94fc8f |
| CN=Amazon Root CA 3,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) | CN=Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2,O=Starfield Technologies\, Inc.,L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US | 25 May 2015 | 31 Dec 2037 | ECDSA 256 | SHA256-RSA | 67f944a30cfcc4f74b5f5306e54d3b7be0ac3 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.moretes.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| moretes.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; base-uri 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; form-action 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.moretes.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.moretes.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
service_compare ~38
Compare curated AWS service families against user constraints. No automatic winner or fabricated scores.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| constraints | array | yes | – |
| family | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| constraints | array | – | – |
| decisionRequired | string|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| options | array | – | – |
| sources | array | – | – |
| validated | boolean|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
service_equivalents ~76
Map a cloud capability to equivalent managed services on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, OCI and open source. Names as of the snapshot date; verify current naming, regions and pricing before deciding.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | – | – |
| from | string | yes | – |
| query | string | – | – |
| to | array | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | – | – |
| from | string|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| rows | array | – | – |
| snapshotDate | string|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
slo_budget ~44
Calculate an availability error budget for a chosen period.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| availabilityPercent | number | yes | – |
| periodDays | integer | yes | – |
| usedDowntimeMinutes | number | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| allowedDowntimeMinutes | number|null | – | – |
| availabilityPercent | number|null | – | – |
| exhausted | boolean|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| periodDays | number|null | – | – |
| remainingMinutes | number|null | – | – |
| usedDowntimeMinutes | number|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
storage_growth ~114
Project storage volume and relative cost over time from ingest, retention, compression, replication and growth; suggests tiering thresholds.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| coldTierPricePerGBMonth | number | – | – |
| compressionRatio | number | yes | – |
| dailyIngestGB | number | yes | – |
| hotDays | integer | yes | – |
| hotTierPricePerGBMonth | number | – | – |
| monthlyGrowthPercent | number | yes | – |
| months | integer | yes | – |
| replicationFactor | number | yes | – |
| retentionDays | integer | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assumptions | object | – | – |
| finalStoredGB | number|null | – | – |
| finalStoredTB | number|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitations | array | – | – |
| series | array | – | – |
| steadyState | boolean|null | – | – |
| tiering | string|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
terraform_plan_review ~64
Review a Terraform or OpenTofu plan exported as JSON (terraform show -json): deletions and replacements of stateful resources, public exposure, disabled encryption, literal credentials, broad policies and unpinned providers. Any provider; heuristic.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| plan | object | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actions | object | – | – |
| findings | array | – | – |
| gate | string|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| limitations | array | – | – |
| resources | number|null | – | – |
| sources | array | – | – |
| summary | object | – | – |
| terraformVersion | string|null | – | – |
| validated | boolean|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
threat_model ~50
Create STRIDE review prompts for explicitly supplied assets and trust boundaries. Review aid, not a scanner.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assets | array | yes | – |
| boundaries | array | yes | – |
| dataClassification | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assets | array | – | – |
| boundaries | array | – | – |
| dataClassification | string|null | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| sources | array | – | – |
| threats | array | – | – |
| validated | boolean|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
well_architected_review ~43
Organize evidence by six pillars. A met control without evidence is unknown, never certified.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| controls | array | yes | – |
| workload | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| controls | array | – | – |
| kind | string|null | – | – |
| limitation | string|null | – | – |
| missingPillars | array | – | – |
| next | string|null | – | – |
| sources | array | – | – |
| summary | object | – | – |
| validated | boolean|null | – | – |
| workload | string|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Moretes Architect MCP server?
Moretes Architect MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.moretes.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.moretes.com
claude mcp add --transport http fernando-moretes-moretes-aws-architect-mcp 'https://mcp.moretes.com/mcp'
What is the Moretes Architect MCP server?
Moretes Architect MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.fernando-moretes/moretes-aws-architect-mcp. Evidence-first architecture workbench: 48 deterministic tools, 10 architect personas, any cloud. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.moretes.com/mcp).
Is the Moretes Architect MCP server safe to use?
Moretes Architect MCP scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Moretes Architect MCP server expose?
Moretes Architect MCP exposes 48 tools: architect_panel, code_review_architecture, dependency_manifest_review, requirements_check, architecture_pattern, and 43 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,134 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Moretes Architect MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Moretes Architect MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Moretes Architect MCP server still maintained?
Moretes Architect MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.