# Sovereign AI Act MCP (remote · www.regulatoryai.eu)

Classify any AI system under the EU AI Act: risk tier + binding Articles, verbatim from the law.

- Trust score: 74/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-10-22

## Components

- remote · `www.regulatoryai.eu`: 74/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www)
- npm · `sovereign-ai-act-mcp`: 81/100, [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/sovereign-ai-act-mcp.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/sovereign-ai-act-mcp)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.4.1`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-10-22.

- **Endpoint Security**: 57/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 70/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 350 tokens (~70/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 93/100
  - Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 75/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 25% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### How do I install the Sovereign AI Act MCP server?

Sovereign AI Act MCP is a hosted endpoint at https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp 'https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp'
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
      "url": "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp]
url = "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp --url 'https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp' --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp:
    url: "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp'
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-10-20 (score 74, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-18 (score 73, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-16 (score 72, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-14 (score 71, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-12 (score 70, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-10 (score 69, +2)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-05 (score 67, +1)

The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

### 2026-10-03 (score 66, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

## MCP tools (5)

### `classify_ai_system` (~98 tokens)

Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689): risk tier (prohibited/high_risk/limited/minimal) + Annex III category + binding Articles, grounded verbatim in the law. Use whenever asked if an AI system is high-risk/prohibited or what obligations apply.

Input parameters:

- `description` (string, required): Plain-language description of the AI system.
- `language` (string)

### `lookup_article` (~53 tokens)

Verbatim text of an original EU AI Act Article (1–113) or inserted Article 4a, 60a or 75a–75d.

Input parameters:

- `language` (string)
- `number` (required)

### `search_eu_ai_act` (~43 tokens)

Full-text search across the EU AI Act corpus (Articles, Recitals, Annexes).

Input parameters:

- `language` (string)
- `query` (string, required)

### `get_compliance_deadlines` (~29 tokens)

Canonical EU AI Act application dates (post Digital-Omnibus) + fine tiers.

### `review_feature` (~127 tokens)

EU AI Act CO-PILOT review for builders: pass a feature, spec or behaviour you are about to ship and get a ship/caution/stop signal (OK / TRANSPARENCY / REVIEW REQUIRED / STOP), the binding Articles, the obligations that apply, red flags and concrete next steps — grounded verbatim in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use proactively while designing or coding an AI feature, before it ships.

Input parameters:

- `input` (string, required): The AI feature, spec or behaviour you are about to build/ship.
- `language` (string)

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-10-22: 74
- 2026-10-21: 74
- 2026-10-20: 74
- 2026-10-19: 73
- 2026-10-18: 73
- 2026-10-17: 72
- 2026-10-16: 72
- 2026-10-15: 71
- 2026-10-14: 71
- 2026-10-13: 70
- 2026-10-12: 70
- 2026-10-10: 69
- 2026-10-07: 67
- 2026-10-06: 67
- 2026-10-05: 67
- 2026-10-04: 66
- 2026-10-03: 66
- 2026-10-02: 65
- 2026-10-01: 65
- 2026-09-30: 64
- 2026-09-29: 64
- 2026-09-28: 63
- 2026-09-27: 63
- 2026-09-26: 62
- 2026-09-25: 62
- 2026-09-24: 61

## Common questions

### What is the Sovereign AI Act MCP server?

Sovereign AI Act MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as eu.regulatoryai/sovereign-ai-act-mcp. Classify any AI system under the EU AI Act: risk tier + binding Articles, verbatim from the law. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp).

### Is the Sovereign AI Act MCP server safe to use?

Sovereign AI Act MCP scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Sovereign AI Act MCP server expose?

Sovereign AI Act MCP exposes 5 tools: classify_ai_system, lookup_article, search_eu_ai_act, get_compliance_deadlines, review_feature. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 350 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Does the Sovereign AI Act MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Sovereign AI Act MCP without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

### Is the Sovereign AI Act MCP server still maintained?

Sovereign AI Act MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp
- Repository: https://github.com/saidbazyar/sovereign-ai-act-mcp
- Website: https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp/
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/eu-regulatoryai-sovereign-ai-act-mcp/www