Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Busymate DevTools

REMOTE · MCP.BUSYMATE.DEV

Capture, inspect & debug HTTPS traffic across iOS, Android, browsers & backends — 304 MCP tools.

Available components

0 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 92% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security89
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 13769 tokens (~259/item across 53 items; 53 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage91
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 72% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "list_wipe_jobs" implies "wipe" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 54 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 7 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.busymate.dev

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=busymate.ai CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 16 Oct 2026 14 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 660fd2b691a629d07c3f365aad5a8966afd
SANs: *.busymate.ai, *.busymate.dev, *.busymate.net, busymate.ai, busymate.dev, busymate.net
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.busymate.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. DS published 60074 8 Verified
busymate.dev. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer resource_metadata="https://mcp.busymate.dev/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource", scope="mcp", error="invalid_token", error_description="missing Bearer token"

Bearer resource_metadata="https://mcp.busymate.dev/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource", scope="mcp", error="invalid_token", error_description="missing Bearer token"
Header Value
www-authenticate Bearer resource_metadata="https://mcp.busymate.dev/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource", scope="mcp", error="invalid_token", error_description="missing Bearer token"

Protected resource metadata

Document https://mcp.busymate.dev/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://mcp.busymate.dev
Authorisation server https://mcp.busymate.dev

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.busymate.dev Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.busymate.dev HTTPS enforced 308 https://mcp.busymate.dev/
MCP tools · 53 exposed · ~13,458 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
share_advisor_finding ~172

Build a SHAREABLE package for ONE advisor finding — the max-context markdown + flat LLM prose + the permalink, so it can be dropped into a doc/chat/issue with full context (Finding · Analysis · Evidence · Deep links · Repro · Meta). Returns { format, permalink (https://dash.busymate.dev/advisor?sev&kind&f), advisor_url, markdown, llm_text } — `format` is an emphasis hint (markdown|llm|links) ECHOED BACK in the result (defaulted to markdown when omitted or unrecognized); every other field is returned regardless of it. Read-only. Gated audit:view.

NameTypeReqDescription
fingerprintstringyesThe finding fingerprint.
formatstring–Emphasis hint (default markdown); all fields returned.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

summarize_device_traffic ~315

BOUNDED traffic aggregation for ONE device — the FIRST tool to call to report what a device is doing, find the busy/flooding host, or pick a host to clean up. REQUIRES a device (`device_uuid` or `deviceName`) — a host alone is NOT enough: if you don't know which device, ask the user (or check list_devices) BEFORE calling. NEVER scans or returns raw rows (use it instead of search_entries/inspect_requests on a high-volume device — those time out at scale). Omit `host` → top hosts by request count (which host dominates). Pass `host` → top path-bases on that host with per-path count + last-seen (which endpoint floods). Optional absolute time range. Fast on 17k+ rows (one index-only GROUP BY). Returns ONLY {host|path_base, count, last_seen} — no headers/bodies.

NameTypeReqDescription
afterstring–Only entries with ts >= this ISO date/datetime.
beforestring–Only entries with ts < this ISO date/datetime.
deviceNamestring–The device's name — an alternative to device_uuid; one of the two is REQUIRED.
device_uuidstring–REQUIRED unless deviceName is given — the device to summarize.
hoststring–Omit for top hosts; pass a full hostname to get its top path-bases.
limitnumber–Max groups (default 25, capped 100).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

test_pac_connection ~472

PROVE whether PAC capture actually works for ONE device — the "is it really working?" answer, not "does it look configured". Runs 8 independent checks and returns a per-check verdict with a specific human fix: (1) connection mode — is the device even on `pac` (a `vpn`/`off` device is SAID SO plainly, never reported as broken PAC); (2) PAC port + URL — a pool port is allocated and http://<port>.busymate.net/ + /proxy.pac + /wpad.dat each serve HTTP 200 with the PAC content type; (3) THE HEADLINE — the PAC the proxy really serves this device carries a PROXY directive and is NOT the silent DIRECT fallback (a DIRECT PAC means the device bypasses capture ENTIRELY while looking perfectly configured — ~11k serves/day hit this); (4) egress IP is in the asserted allowlist (the dominant cause of that DIRECT fallback); (5) the proxy is really routing this device's requests right now; (6) the effective SSL-proxying list is NON-EMPTY and covers hosts the device actually contacts (an empty list = configured to decrypt NOTHING, which FAILS); (7) live decryption evidence — genuinely DECRYPTED requests for hosts in this device's OWN resolved list (a CONNECT envelope or a raw-TCP row is never counted as proof); (8) the device-reported CA-trust readiness + its exact remediation. Every check is pass | fail | unverified — a check that could not reach the thing it judges returns UNVERIFIED and is NEVER reported as healthy. Overall verdict ok | degraded | broken | unverified plus ONE plain-language next action. YOUR OWN (or demo) devices by default; testing someone else's device requires devices:view (re-verified server-side, fail-closed). Read-only, no confirm, changes nothing.

NameTypeReqDescription
deviceNamestring–The device's name — an alternative to device_uuid; one of the two is REQUIRED.
device_uuidstring–REQUIRED unless deviceName is given — the device to test.
window_minutesnumber–Lookback for the traffic + decryption checks (default 60, min 5, max 1440).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Busymate DevTools MCP server?

Busymate DevTools is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.busymate.dev/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.busymate.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-busymate-busymate-devtools 'https://mcp.busymate.dev/'
Common questions

What is the Busymate DevTools MCP server?

Busymate DevTools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.busymate/busymate-devtools. Capture, inspect & debug HTTPS traffic across iOS, Android, browsers & backends, 304 MCP tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.busymate.dev).

Is the Busymate DevTools MCP server safe to use?

Busymate DevTools scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Busymate DevTools MCP server expose?

Busymate DevTools exposes 53 tools: get_product_pricing, search_docs, read_docs_page, list_docs_sections, get_setup_steps, and 48 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 13,458 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Busymate DevTools MCP server require authentication?

Yes. Busymate DevTools asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the Busymate DevTools MCP server still maintained?

Busymate DevTools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Busymate DevTools MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Busymate DevTools, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.